The Effect of a Joint Correction for the Attenuating Effect of Criterion Unreliability and Case 1 Restriction of Range on Expected Criterion Performance and the Conditional Probability of Success
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 1999
The Effect of a Joint Correction for the Attenuating Effect of Criterion Unreliability and Case 1 Restriction of Range on Expected Criterion Performance and the Conditional Probability of Success
This article reports the results of a portion of a more comprehensive study on the effect of corrections for random error of measurement and/or various forms of restriction of range on those estimates required to specify and justify a selection procedure. The objective of this article is to determine the effect of a joint correction for criterion unreliability and Case 1 selection on the predictor on the expected criterion performance, conditional criterion variance, and selection decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrett, G. V. , Phillips, J. S., & Alexander, R. A. (1981). Concurrent and predictive validity designs: A critical reanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 1-6.
2.
Berenson, M. L. , Levine, D. M., & Goldstein, M. (1983). Intermediate statistical methods and applications: A computer package approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bobko, P. (1983). An analysis of correlations corrected for attenuation and range restriction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 584-589.
4.
Boudreau, J. W. (1991). Utility analysis for decisions in human resource management. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 621-745). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
5.
Campbell, D. T. , & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
6.
Campbell, J. P. (1991). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
7.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cook, T. D. , Campbell, D. T., & Peracchio, L. (1991). Quasi experimentation. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 491-576). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
9.
Coxon, A.P.M. (1982). The user’s guide to multidimensional scaling. London: Heinemann Educational.
10.
Cronbach, L. J. , & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11.
Ellis, M. V. , & Blustein, D. L. (1991). Developing and using educational and psychological tests and measures: The unificationist perspective. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 550-555.
12.
Gatewood, R. B. , & Feild, H. S. (1994). Human resource selection. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
13.
Guion, R. M. , & Cranny, C. J. (1982). A note on concurrent and predictive validity designs: A critical reanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 239-244.
14.
Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Landy, F. J. (1986). Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. American Psychologist, 41, 1183-1192.
16.
Lee, R. , Miller, K. J., & Graham, W. K. (1982). Corrections for restriction of range and attenuation in criterion-related validation studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 637-639.
17.
Mendoza, J. L. , & Mumford, M. (1987). Corrections for attenuation and range restriction on the predictor. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 282-293.
18.
Milkovich, G. T. , & Boudreau, J. W. (1994). Human resource management (7th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
19.
Pearson, K. (1903). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution XI: On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Philosophical Transactions, 200, 1-66.
20.
Schiffman, S. S. , Reynolds, M. L., & Young F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods and applications. New York: Academic Press.
21.
Schmidt, F. L. , Hunter, J. E., & Urry, V. W. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473-485.
22.
Schmitt, N. , & Landy, F. J. (1993). The concept of validity. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 275-340). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
23.
Sussmann, M. , & Robertson, D. U. (1986). The validity of validity: An analysis of validation study designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 461-468.
24.
Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
25.
Theron, C. C. (1998). The effects of a joint correction for the attenuating effect of criterion unreliability and Case 1 restriction of range on the validity coefficient. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 23(3), 32-38.
26.
Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York: John Wiley.
