The authors investigated preference, perceived danger, and fear for a sample of 70 field/forest settings. Predictor variables included perception-based variables (visual access, penetration, movement ease), information-based variables (mystery, concealment, refuge), and variables thought to intervene between concealment and danger (entrapment, rearview concern). All variables were rated by independent groups. Danger and fear were strongly positively correlated for these settings, but preference and danger had a more modest negative correlation. Factor analysis of the strongly intercorrelated predictor variables yielded two factors, interpreted as Visibility and Locomotor Access. Both factors were positive predictors of preference and negative predictors of danger. Further analyses suggested feelings of entrapment could mediate the positive relation between concealment and danger and that after controlling for other indicators of visibility, mystery has a positive relation to preference. In general, the role of visual and locomotor access in accounting for preference or danger reactions is highlighted by these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. New York: John Wiley.
2.
Appleton, J. (1984). Prospect and refuge re-visited. Landscape Journal, 3, 91-103.
3.
Balling, J. D. , & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment & Behavior, 14, 5-28.
4.
Fisher, B. S. , & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment & Behavior, 24, 35-65.
5.
Hebb, D. O. (1972). Textbook of psychology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
6.
Heft, H. , & Nasar, J. L. (2000). Evaluating environmental scenes using dynamic versus static displays. Environment & Behavior, 32, 301-322.
7.
Hershberger, R. G. , & Cass, R. C. (1973). The adequacy of various media as representations of the designed environment. Man-Environment Systems, 3, 371-372.
8.
Herzog, T. R. (1984). A cognitive analysis of preference for field-and-forest environments. Landscape Research, 9, 10-16.
9.
Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 27-43.
10.
Herzog, T. R. , & Flynn-Smith, J. A. (2001). Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys. Environment & Behavior, 33, 655-668.
11.
Herzog, T. R. , Herbert, E. J., Kaplan, R., & Crooks, C. L. (2000). Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environment & Behavior, 32, 323-346.
12.
Herzog, T. R. , & Miller, E. J. (1998). The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference. Environment & Behavior, 30, 429-449.
13.
Herzog, T. R. , & Smith, G. A. (1988). Danger, mystery, and environmental preference. Environment & Behavior, 20, 320-344.
14.
Hetherington, J. , Daniel, T. C., & Brown, T. C. (1993). Is motion more important than it sounds? The medium of presentation in environment perception research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 283-291.
15.
Hull, R. B., IV , & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101-114.
16.
Kaplan, R. , & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Kaplan, R. , Kaplan, S., & Brown, T. (1989). Environmental preference: A comparison of four domains of predictors. Environment & Behavior, 21, 509-530.
18.
Kaplan, R. , Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19.
Kuo, F. E. , Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment & Behavior, 30, 28-59.
20.
Lazarus, J. , & Symonds, M. (1992). Contrasting effects of protective and obstructive cover on avian vigilance. Animal Behavior, 43, 519-521.
21.
Nasar, J. L. (1983). Adult viewers’preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment & Behavior, 15, 589-614.
22.
Nasar, J. L. , & Fisher, B. (1993). “Hot spots” of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187-206.
23.
Nasar, J. L. , Fisher, B., & Grannis, M. (1993). Proximate cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 161-178.
24.
Nasar, J. L. , & Jones, K. M. (1997). Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment & Behavior, 29, 291-323.
25.
Ruddell, E. J. , Gramann, J. H., Rudis, V. A., & Westphal, J. M. (1989). The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic-beauty models. Environment & Behavior, 21, 393-412.
26.
Schroeder, H. W. , & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 178-194.
27.
Scott, M. J. , & Canter, D. V. (1997). Picture or place? A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 263-281.
28.
Shaffer, G. S. , & Anderson, L. M. (1983). Perceptions of the security and attractiveness of urban parking lots. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 311-323.
29.
Sommer, R. , Summit, J., & Clements, A. (1993). Slide ratings of street-tree attributes: Some methodological issues and answers. Landscape Journal, 12, 17-22.
30.
Stamps, A. E., III . (1990). Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 907-913.
31.
Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
32.
Trent, R. B. , Neumann, E., & Kvashny, A. (1987). Presentation mode and question format artifacts in visual assessment research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 225-235.
33.
Woodcock, D. M. (1982). A functionalist approach to environmental preference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
34.
Zube, E. H. , Pitt, D. G., & Evans, G. W. (1983). A lifespan developmental study of landscape assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 115-128.
35.
Zube, E. H. , Simcox, D. E., & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6, 62-80.
