To date, most research on travel behavior has been limited to studying utilitarian appraisals of car users and users of public transport. Studies on affective experiences are usually limited to commuter stress. A survey among university employees revealed that in support of previous research, car commuters find their journey more stressful than other mode users. The main sources of this stress are delays and other road users. Users of public transport also “complain” about delays; however, this results in stress as well as boredom. Walking and cycling journeys are the most relaxing and exciting and therefore seem the most optimum form of travel from an affective perspective. The affective appraisals of the daily commute are related to instrumental aspects, such as journey time, but also to general attitudes toward various travel modes. These findings have implications for sustainable transport policy initiatives that aim to persuade people to abandon their car.
Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2001). Theory-driven subgroup-specific evaluation of an intervention to reduce private car use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1300-1329.
2.
Berlyne, D.E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. New York: Halstead.
3.
Cohen, S. (1980). Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behaviour. Psychological Bulletin,88, 82-108.
4.
Department of the Environment, Transport, Local Government, and the Regions. (2001). Focus on personal travel 2001. London: Stationary Office.
5.
Drottenborg, H. (1999). Aesthetics and safety in traffic environments . Unpublished doctoral thesis, School of Architecture, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden.
6.
Eagly, A.H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1994). Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113-137.
7.
Ellaway, A., Macintyre, S., Hiscock, R., & Kearns, A. (2003). In the driving seat: Psychosocial benefits from private motor vehicle transport compared to public transport. Transport Research Part F, 6, 217-231.
8.
Evans, G.W., & Carrere, S. (1991). Traffic congestion, perceived control and psychophysiological stress among urban bus drivers. Journal of Applied Psychology , 76, 658-663.
9.
Evans, G.W., Wener, R.E., & Phillips, D. (2002). The morning rush hour: Predictability and commuter stress. Environment and Behavior, 34, 521-530.
10.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Fujii, S., Gärling, T., & Kitamura, R. (2001). Changes in drivers' perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: Effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma. Environment and Behavior, 33, 796-808.
12.
Godlee, F., & Walker, A. (1992). Health and the environment. London: British Medical Journal.
13.
Gulian, E., Matthews, G., Glendon, A., Davies, D.R., & Debney, L.M. (1989). Dimensions of driver stress. Ergonomics, 32, 585-602.
14.
Hopkinson, P., & Wardman, M. (1996). Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities . Transport Policy, 3, 241-249.
15.
Hu, G., Pekkarinen, H., Haenninen, O., Yu, Z., Guyo, Z., & Tian, H. (2002). Commuting, leisure-time psysical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in China. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34, 234-238.
16.
Hunecke, M., Bloebaum, A., Matthies, E., & Hoeger, R. (2001). Responsibility and environment: Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior . Environment and Behavior, 33, 830-852.
17.
Joireman, J., Van Lange, P., Van Vugt, M., Wood, A., Leest, T., & Lambert, C. (2001). Structural solutions to social dilemmas: A field study on commuters' willingness to fund improvements in public transit. Journal of Applied social Psychology, 31, 504-526. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A., & Reich, M. (1995). Commuting stress: Causes, effects and methods of coping. New York: Plenum.
18.
Koslowsky, M., & Krausz, M. (1993). On the relationship between commuting, stress symptoms, and attitudinal measures: A LISREL application. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 485-492.
19.
Lumsdon, L., & Tolley, R. (2001). The national cycle strategy in the UK: To what extent have local authorities adopted its mode strategy approach? Journal of TransportGeography, 9, 293-301.
20.
Matthies, E., Kuhn, S., & Kloeckner, C.A. (2002). Travel mode choice of women: The result of limitation, ecological norm or weak habit? Environment and Behavior, 34, 163-177. Mokhtarian, P.L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research A , 35, 695-719. Nilsson , M., & Küller, R. (2000). Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transportation Research, Part D, 5, 211-234.
21.
Novaco, R.W., Kliewer, W., & Broquet, A. (1991). Home environmental consequences of commute travel impedance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 881-909. Novaco, R.W., Stokols, D., & Milanesi , L. (1990). Objective and subjective dimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuter stress. American Journal of Community Psychology , 18, 231-257.
22.
Office for National Statistics. (2003). Census 2001. National report for England and Wales. London : Stationary Office. Summary available at www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/727-A.asp
23.
Oja, P., Vuori, I., & Paronen, O. (1998). Daily walking and cycling to work: Their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. Patient Education and Counseling, 33(Suppl. 1) S87-S94.
24.
Parsons, R., Tassinary, C.G., Ulrich, R.S., Hebl, M.R., & Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998). The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113-139.
25.
Rasmussen, C., Knapp, T., & Garner, L. (2000). Driving-induced stress in urban college students . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 437-443.
26.
Russell, J., & Lanius, A. (1984). Adaptation levels and the affective appraisal of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 119-135.
27.
Russell, J.A., & Snodgrass, J. (1987). Emotions and the environment. In D. Stokols & J. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 245-280). New York: John Wiley.
28.
Schaeffer, M.H., Street, S.W., Singer, J.E., & Baum, A. (1988). Effects of control on the stress reactions of commuters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 944-957.
29.
Steg, L. (2004). Car use: Lust and must. In T. Rothengatter & R. D. Huguenin (Eds.). Traffic and transport psychology. Theory and application. Proceedings of the ICTTP2000 (pp. 443-452). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
30.
Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Slotegraaf, G. (2001). Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transportation Research Part F, 4, 151-169.
31.
Stokols, D., Novaco, R.W., Stokols, J., & Campbell, J. (1978). Traffic congestion, type a behavior and stress . Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 467-480.
32.
Stradling, S. (2002). Transport user needs and marketing public transport . Municipal Engineer, 151(1), 23-28.
33.
Stradling, S., Meadows, M., & Beatty, S. (1999, December). Factors affecting car use choices. A report to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. TransportResearch Institute, Napier University , Edinburgh.
34.
Van Lange, P., Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R., & Ruiter, R. (1998). A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: The roles of social value orientation and trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 796-820.
35.
Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., Van Knippenberg, A., & Van Knippenberg, C. (1994). Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 285-300.
36.
Wardman, M., Hine, J., & Stradling, S. (2001). Interchange and travel choice, Volumes 1, 2 and executive summaryEdinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.
37.
Wener, R., Evans, G., Philips, D., & Nadler, N. (2004). Running for the 7:45: The effects of public transit improvements on commuter stress. Transportation, 30, 203-220.
