This research examines perceived and actual preparedness for two types of natural hazard risks: earthquakes in the Los Angeles County area and hurricanes within the New Orleans metropolitan area. Using data collected from a sample of households in these regions, the influence of individuals' confidence in local government to manage a disaster and exposure to disaster preparedness information sources were tested as explanations for levels of perceived and actual preparedness. Regression analyses show that a high level of confidence in local government to manage a disaster and exposure to more preparedness information sources were associated with a higher level of perceived preparedness. No support for a potential dampening effect of confidence in local government on household preparedness actions was found. The results also reveal only limited support for the impact of information exposure on actual preparedness. The results for actual preparedness vary between the study areas; therefore, we follow the analysis with a discussion of these differences and the implications drawn from the research.
Arceneaux, K., & Stein, R.M. (2006). Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election . Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), 43-53.
2.
Bourque, L.B., Siegel, J.M., Kano, M., & Wood, M.M. (2006). Weathering the storm: The impact of hurricanes on physical and mental health. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 129-151.
3.
Burby, R.J., Steinberg, L.J., & Basolo, V. (2003). The tenure trap: The vulnerability of renters to joint natural and technological disasters. Urban Affairs Review, 39(1), 32-58.
Cutter, S. (1993). Living with risks: The geography of technological disasters. London: Edward Arnold .
6.
Cutter, S.L., & Barnes, K. (1982). Evacuation behavior at Three Mile Island. Disasters, 6, 116-124.
7.
Department of Homeland Security and Office of Gulf Coast Rebuilding. (2006, February). Current housing unit damage estimates: Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. Retrieved April 17, 2007, from www.gnocdc.org/reports/GulfCoast_HousingDamageEstimates_021206.pdf
8.
Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method . New York: Wiley.
9.
Dooley, D., Catalano, R., Mishra, S., & Serxner, S. (1992). Earthquake preparedness: Predictors in a community survey. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 451-470.
10.
Drabek, T.E. (1986). Human systems response to disaster. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Erickson, P.A. (1999). Emergency response planning for corporate and municipal managers. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
Federal Emergency Management Agency.(2001, August). Emergency managers: national situation update. Retrieved August 25, 2005, from www.fema.gov/emanagers/2001/nat080801.shtm
13.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe: A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences , 9, 127-152.
14.
Fothergill, A., Maestas, E.G.M., & Darlington, J.D. (1999). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters , 23(2), 156-173.
15.
Gerber, B.J., & Neely, G.W. (2005). Perceived risk and citizen preferences for governmental management of routine hazards. The Policy Studies Journal , 33(3), 395-418.
16.
Greening, L., Dollinger, S.J., & Pitz, G. (1996). Adolescents' perceived risk and personal experience with natural disasters: An evaluation of cognitive heuristics. Acta Psychologica, 91(1), 27-38.
17.
Jackson, E.L. (1981). Response to earthquake: The west coast of North America. Environment and Behavior13(4), 387-416.
18.
Jarrell, J.D., Mayfield, M., Rappaport, E.N., & Landsea, C.W. (2001). The deadliest, costliest, and most intense United States hurricanes from 1900 to 2000, NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS TPC-1. Retrieved from www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/deadly/index.html
19.
Kartez, J.D., & Lindell, M.K. (1990). Adaptive planning for community disaster response . In R. T. Sylves & W. L. Waugh, Jr. (Eds.), Cities and disasters: North American studies in emergency management. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
20.
Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2000). Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 461-501.
21.
Lindell, M.K., & Prater, C.S. (2002). Risk area residents' perceptions and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 32(11), 2377-2392.
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals. ( 2007). State of Louisiana, Louisiana family assistance. Retrieved June 11, 2007, from http://www.dhh.louisiana.gov/offices/?ID=303
24.
Mileti, D.S. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: J. Henry Press.
25.
Mileti, D.S., & Darlington, J.D. (1995). Societal response to revised earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 13, 119-145.
26.
Mileti, D.S., & Darlington, J.D. (1997). The role of searching in shaping reactions to earthquake risk information. Social Problems , 44(1), 89-103.
27.
Mileti, D.S., Fitzpatrick, C., & Farhar, B.C. (1992). Fostering public participation for natural hazards: Lessons from the Parkfield earthquake prediction. Environment , 34(3), 16-39.
28.
Mileti, D.S., Nathe, S., Gori, P., Greene, M., & Lemersal, E. (2004). Public hazards communication and education: The state of the art. Update of Informer, 2, Public education for earthquake hazards. Retrieved August 27, 2007, from www.colorado.edu/hazards/informer/informerupdate.pdf.
29.
Mileti, D.S., & O'Brien, P.W. (1992). Warnings during disaster: Normalizing communicated risk. Social Problems, 39(1), 40-57.
30.
Mullis, J.P., Duval, T.S., & Rogers, R. (2003). The effect of a swarm of local tornados on tornado preparedness: A quasi-comparable cohort investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(8), 1716-1725.
31.
Noll, R.G. (1996). The complex politics of catastrophe economics . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12(2-3), 141-146.
32.
Norris, F.H., Smith, T., & Kaniasty, K. (2000). Revisiting the experience-behavior hypothesis: The effects of Hurricane Hugo on hazard preparedness and other self-protective acts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 37-47.
33.
Palm, R., & Carroll, J. (1998). Illusions of safety. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
Peacock, W.G., Brody, S.D., & Highfield, W. (2005). Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida's single family homeowners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73, 120-135.
35.
Pollak, R.A. (1996). Government risk regulation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, 25-34.
36.
Riad, J.K., Norris, F.H., & Ruback, R.B. (1999). Predicting evacuation in two major disasters: Risk perception, social influence, and access to resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 918-934.
37.
Rubin, C.B. (1985). Community recovery from a major natural disaster. [Monograph 41]. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
38.
Russell, L.A., Goltz, J.D., & Bourque, L.B. (1995). Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after earthquakes. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 744-770.
39.
Schneider, S.K. (1995). Flirting with disaster. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
40.
Shedler, J., & Manis, M. (1986). Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 26-36.
41.
Sjoberg, L. (2006). Will the real meaning of affect please stand up ? Journal of Risk Research, 9(2), 101-108.
42.
Slovic P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311-322.
43.
Spence, P.R., Lachlan, K., Burke, J.M., & Seeger, M.W. (2007). Media use and information needs of the disabled during a natural disaster. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18(2), 394-404.
44.
Steinberg, L.J., Basolo, V., Burby, R.J., Levine, J.N., & Cruz, A.M. (2004). Joint seismic and technological disasters: Possible impacts and community preparedness in an urban setting. Natural Hazards Review, 5(4), 159-169.
45.
Tanaka, K. (2005). The impact of disaster education on public preparation and mitigation for earthquakes: A cross-country comparison between Fukui, Japan and the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. Applied Geography, 25, 201-225.
46.
Tierney, K.J. (1993). Disaster preparedness and response: Research findings and guidance from the social science literature (Preliminary Paper No. 193) . Newark:: University of Delaware Disaster Research Center.
47.
Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
48.
Turner, R.H., Nigg, J.M., & Heller-Paz, D. (1986). Waiting for disaster: Earthquake watch in California.Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
US Geological Survey. (1996). USGS response to an urban earthquake: Northridge '94 (Open-File Report 96-263) . Retrieved April 17, 2007, from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1996/ofr-96-0263/
50.
Walsh-Daneshmandi, A., & MacLachlan, M. (2000). Environmental risk to the self: Factor analysis and development of subscales for the Environmental Appraisal Inventory (EAI) with an Irish sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 141-149.
51.
Walsh, M. (1989). Disasters: Current research and planning experience . London: Edward Arnold.
52.
Weinstein, N.D. (1987). Cross-hazard consistencies: Conclusions about self-protective behavior. In N. D. Weinstein (Ed.), Taking care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Wright, J. D., & Rossi, P. H. (Eds.). (1981). Social science and natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books .
