This study argues that although scenic beauty, preference, and restoration are correlated due to their functional significance over evolution, they still can be distinguished from one another within natural landscapes. A total of 274 undergraduate students reported their responses with scenic beauty, preference, and restoration as the target variables while viewing 48 landscape slides of six biomes. In addition, a group of three judges evaluated three physical features presented in the landscape slides as controlling and descriptor variables, described as “complexity,” “openness,” and “water features.” Statistical analyses showed that (a) the three target variables were all significantly and highly (rs > 0.94, p < 0.05) correlated; (b) the only mediated relationship among the target variables was preference mediating scenic beauty and restoration; and (c) scenic beauty and preference versus restoration could be distinguished from each other with respect to the types of natural landscapes and the three physical features.
Balling, J.D., & Falk, J.H. ( 1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments . Environment and Behavior, 14, 5-28.
4.
Berlyne, D.E. ( 1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Berlyne, D.E. ( 1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 274-290.
6.
Berlyne, D.E. ( 1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
7.
Berlyne, D.E., & Lewis, J.L. ( 1963). Effects of heightened arousal on human exploratory behavior . Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 398-411.
8.
Cackowski, J., & Nasar, J.L. ( 2003). The restorative effects on roadside vegetation: Implications for automobile driver anger and frustration. Environment and Behavior, 35, 736-751.
9.
Cimprich, B. ( 1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16, 83-92.
10.
Cohen, S., Evans, G.W., Stokols, D., & Krantz, D.S. ( 1986). Behavior, health and environmental stress. New York: Plenum.
11.
Daniel, T.C., & Boster, R.S. ( 1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. USDA, Forest Service Research paper, RM-167, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
12.
Daniel, T.C., & Vining, J. ( 1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 39-84). New York: Plenum .
13.
Faber Taylor, A., Wiley, A., Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior , 30, 3-27.
14.
Gibson, J.J. ( 1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Grahn, P. ( 1991). Om parkers betydelse. Goteborg: Graphic System AB.
16.
Gritter, M.K. ( 1997). The effect of time-since-treatment and other factors on the perceived scenic beauty of southern pine-oak forest. Unpublished master’s thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station.
17.
Han, K.-T. ( 2001). A review: Theories of restorative environments. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 12, 30-43.
18.
Han, K.-T. ( 2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning , 64, 209-232.
19.
Han, K.-T. (in press). Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the psychology, behavior, and health of students at a junior high school in Taiwan. Environment and Behavior.
20.
Hartig, T.A. ( 1993). Testing restorative environments theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
21.
Hartig, T.A., Book, A., Garvill, J., Olsson, T., & Garling, T. ( 1996). Environmental influences on psychological restoration . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 378-393.
22.
Hartig, T.A., Korpela, K., Evans, G.W., & Garling, T. ( 1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 14, 175-194.
23.
Hartig, T.A., Mang, M., & Evans, G.W. ( 1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences . Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
24.
Herzog, T.R., & Barnes, G.J. ( 1999). Tranquility and preference revised. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 171-181.
25.
Herzog, T.R., Black, A.M., Fountaine, K.A., & Knotts, D.J. ( 1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 17, 165-170.
26.
Herzog, T.R., & Bosley, P.J. ( 1992). Tranquillity and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 12, 115-127.
27.
Herzog, T.R., & Chernick, K.K. (2000). Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 20, 29-39.
28.
Herzog, T.R., Maguire, C.P., & Nebel, M.B. ( 2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159-170.
29.
Herzog, T.R., & Stark, J.L. ( 2004). Typicality and preference for positively and negatively valued environmental settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 24, 85-92.
30.
Hietanen, J.K., & Korpela, K.M. ( 2004). Do both negative and positive environmental scenes elicit rapid affective processing? Environment and Behavior, 36, 558-577.
31.
Hull, R.B. ( 1990). Moods as product of leisure: Causes and consequences . Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 99-111.
32.
Hull, R.B., & Harvey, A. ( 1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and Behavior, 21, 323-345.
Hull, R.B., & Stewart, W.P. ( 1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101-114.
35.
Jang, H.-C. ( 1998). Effect of ecosystem management of public acceptance of visual impacts and perceived scenic value in a tourist destination area. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
36.
Kaplan, R. ( 1993). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 193-201.
37.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. ( 1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective . New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R.L. ( 1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Washington, DC: Island Press .
39.
Kaplan, S. ( 1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
40.
Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L.V., & Slakter, D.B. ( 1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment and Behavior, 26, 725-742.
41.
Korpela, K. ( 1991). Are favorite places restorative environments? EDRA, 22, 371-377.
42.
Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. ( 1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 221-233.
43.
Korpela, K.M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G., & Fuhrer, U. ( 2001). Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment and Behavior, 33, 572-589.
44.
Korpela, K.M., Klemettila, T., & Hietanen, J.K. (2002). Evidence for rapid affective evaluation of environmental scenes. Environment and Behavior , 34, 634-650.
45.
Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001a). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33, 343-367.
46.
Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001b). Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 543-571.
47.
Laumann, K., Garling, T., & Stormark, K.M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 31-44.
48.
Macdonald, J.E. ( 1994). The restorative effects of a vacation from work: The role of novelty, positive affect, and nature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Victoria.
49.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J.A. ( 1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
Miller, A.C., Hickman, L.C., & Lemasters, G.K. (1992). A distraction technique for control of burn pain. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation , 13, 576-580.
51.
Moore, E.O. ( 1982). A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands. Journal of Environmental System, 11, 17-34.
52.
Nasar, J.L. ( 1997). New developments in aesthetics for urban design. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environments, behavior, and design (Vol. IV, pp. 149-193). New York: Plenum.
53.
Nasar, J.L. ( 1998). The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Newell, P.B. ( 1997). A cross-cultural examination of favorite places. Environment and Behavior, 29, 495-514.
Orians, G.H., & Heerwagen, J.H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes . In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555-579). New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
Parsons, R. ( 1991). Recovery from stress during exposure to videotaped outdoor environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
59.
Parsons, R., Tassinary, L.G., Ulrich, R.S., Hebl, M.R., & Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998). The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113-140.
60.
Purcell, A.T. ( 1987). Landscape perception, preference, and schema discrepancy . Environment and Planning B, 14, 67-92.
61.
Purcell, T., Peron, E., & Berto, R. ( 2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and Behavior, 33, 93-106.
62.
Rabinowitz, C.B., & Coughlin, R.E. (1970). Analysis of landscape characteristics relevant to preference. Regional Science Research Institute Discussion Paper No. 38, Philadelphia, PA.
63.
Richards, J.M. ( 1996). Units of analysis, measurement theory, and environmental assessment: A response and clarification. Environment and Behavior, 28, 220-236.
64.
Schroeder, H.W. ( 1986). Psychological value of urban trees: Measurement, meaning, and imagination. Proceedings of the Third National Urban Forestry Conference. Washington: American Forestry.
65.
Smardon, R.C. ( 1988). Perception and aesthetics of the urban environments: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning , 15, 85-106.
66.
Spss. (1999). SPSS Base 10.0 Applications Guide. Chicago, IL: Author.
67.
Staats, H., & Hartig, T. ( 2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 199-211.
68.
Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. ( 2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 147-157.
69.
Stamps, A.E. III. ( 2004). Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 1-16.
70.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. ( 1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins .
71.
Tennessen, C.M., & Cimprich, B. ( 1995). View to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77-85.
Ulrich, R.S. ( 1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523-556.
74.
Ulrich, R.S. ( 1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment . In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and natural environments (pp. 85-125). New York: Plenum .
75.
Ulrich, R.S. ( 1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery . Science, 224, 420-421.
76.
Ulrich, R.S. ( 1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilsons (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73-137). Washington, DC: Island/ Shearwater.
77.
Ulrich, R.S., Lunden, O., & Eltinge, J.L. ( 1993). Effects of exposure to nature and abstract pictures on patients recovering from heart surgery. Psychophysiology, 30, 7.
78.
Ulrich, R.S., & Parsons, R. ( 1992). Influences of passive experiences with plants on individual well-being and health. In P. Relt (Ed.), The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development (pp. 93-105). Portland, OR: Timber Press.
79.
Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., & Zelson, M. ( 1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
80.
van den Berg, A.E., Koole, S.L., & van der Wulp, N.Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (how) Are they related?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 135-146.
81.
West, M.I. ( 1985). Landscape views and stress response in the prison environment. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Washington , Seattle.
82.
Yhang, W. ( 1994). The effect of color on the perceived scenic beauty of pine-oak plots in the Ouachita National Forest, Arkansas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station .
83.
Yi, Y.-K. ( 1992). Affect and cognition interface in aesthetic experiences of landscapes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.
84.
Zube, E.H., Pitt, D., & Anderson, T.W. (1975). Perception and prediction on scenic resource values of the Northeast. In E. H. Zube, R. O. Brush, & J. G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions and resources. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
