Social Crime or Spatial Crime? Exploring the Effects of Social,Economical,and Spatial Factors on Burglary Rates

Abstract

Space-crime research has primarily focused on crime prevention through environmental design, based on the ideology of defensible space, territoriality, target-hardening factors, and so on. Much of the research has attempted to determine ideological imperatives within the scope of either architectural buildings or urban areas. Few studies can be found dealing with whether there exists a significant influence of spatial configuration or CPTED-based building designs or social and economical reasons for the patterns of residential burglary distribution. This research focuses on three major factors: social factor of building use patterns, economical factor of building values, and two spatial factors, namely, the configurational factor of urban space structures and the design factor of architectural buildings. To examine the effect of the latter factors on burglary distribution patterns, configurational factor of urban space structures will be examined by investigating the configurational factors of intelligibility and integration. Other factors in consideration are road types, the types of buildings that witness high crime rates, and visibility issues. For the effect of building design factors, issues such as the number of entrances, building height, and target-hardening facilities will be examined. Our findings across six areas in a metropolitan city suggest that intelligible areas that can be easily accessible by passersby, and thus, enable more people to enter the area, are deemed to be less vulnerable than less intelligible areas. The urban space structure configures residential burglary patterns and building-use patterns significantly affect burglary rates, followed by road type and design factor issues.

Keywords

urban crime burglary rate defensible space space configuration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Block, R. , & Block, C. ( 1995). Space, place, and crime: Hot spot areas and hot places of liquor-related crime. In J. Eck & D.Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and Place (pp. 145-184). Monsey, New York: Willow Tree Press.

Brantingham, P. , & Brantingham, P. (1993). Nodes, paths, and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3-28.

Budd, T. ( 1999, April). Burglary of domestic dwellings, findings from the British Crime Survey. Home Office Statistical Bulletin . Retrieved August 27, 2008, from http://www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/burglary/burglary17.htm

Chang, D. ( 2004a). Urban space configuration and space crime. Journal of the Korea Planners Association, 39, 21-32.

Chang, D. ( 2004b).Exploring links between space crime and space configuration . Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 20, 61-69.

Chang, D. , Moon, J. , Kim, Y. , & Park, J. ( 2007). Archispacer: Defining space and space configuration. Proceedings of International Symposium on City Planning, Yokohama, Japan, 299-308.

Choi, J. , & Lee, K. ( 2002a). Interpretation of crime-prone locations through space syntax theory: Burglary case studies in apartment complex. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 18, 53-61.

Choi, J. , & Lee, K. ( 2002b). Interpretation of crime-prone locations through visual access and exposure model: Burglary case studies in apartment complex. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 18, 63-70.

Choi, Y. , Shon, T. , & Kim, J. ( 2000). Crime prevention of residential area in Pusan: Comparison between single-detached unit and apartment. Journal of the Korea Planners Association, 35, 153-165.

10.

Choi, Y. ( 1994). A study on the crime prevention through environmental design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dongguk University , Seoul, South Korea.

11.

Choi, Y. , & Kang, I. ( 1993). The spatial structure of crime in apartment sites. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 9, 25-33.

12.

Crowe, T. ( 1991). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

13.

Gottfredson, S. , & Taylor, R. ( 1986). Person-environment interactions in the production of recidivism. In J. Byrne & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The social ecology of crime (pp. 133-155). New York: Springer .

14.

Greenberg, S. , Rohe, M. , & Williams J. ( 1982). Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods . Population and Environment, 5, 141-165.

15.

Greene, M. , & Green, R. ( 2003). Urban safety in residential areas: Global spatial impact and local self-organising processes. Proceedings of 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 52, 1-52.

16.

Harrell, A. , & Jouvis, C. ( 1994). Community decay and crime. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

17.

Hillier, B. ( 2003). Can streets be made safe? UAS, UCL , London.

18.

Hillier, B. ( 1996). Space is the Machine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Hillier, B. , & Hanson, J. ( 1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Hillier, B. , Penn, A. , Hanson, J. , Grajewski, T. , & Xu, J. ( 1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 29-66.

21.

Hillier, B. , & Shu, S. ( 2000). Crime and urban layout: The need for evidence. In S. Ballintyne (Ed.), Secure Foundations: Key issues in crime prevention, crime reduction and community safety (PP. 224-248). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

22.

Hwang, S. ( 2001). Spatial pattern analysis of crime using GIS: The case of residential burglary MSc dissertation, Kyung-Hee University Seoul, South Korea.

23.

Hwang, S. , & Hwang, C. ( 2003). The spatial pattern analysis of urban crimes using GIS: The case of residential burglary. Journal of the Korea Planners Association, 38, 53-66.

24.

Kornhouser, R. ( 1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Lee, K. ( 1997). Critical appraisal of CPTED research in apartment sites and proposal for future direction of research. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 13, 87-98.

26.

Loukaitou-Sideris, A. ( 1999). Hot spots of bus stop crime: The importance of environmental attributes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, 395-411.

27.

Maguire, M. , & Bennett, T. ( 1992). Burglary in a Dwelling: The office, the offender, and the victim. London: Avebury.

28.

Min, B. , Kim, S. , & Do, G. ( 1992). Crime survey and relation to environmental factors in high-rise apartment sites. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 8, 65-72.

29.

Newman, O. ( 1972). Defensible Space. New York: Collier Books.

30.

Park, K. ( 1995). A study on the types and improvement methods of crime occurring space in residential area: Focused on private residential area in Dong-gu, Kwangju. Seoul, South Korea: Korean Institute of Criminal Justice Policy.

31.

Penn, A. , Hillier, B. , Banister, D. , & Xu, J. ( 1998). Configurational modelling of urban movement networks . Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 59-84.

32.

Sampson, R. , & Groves, W. ( 1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.

33.

Skogan, W. ( 1992). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. California, CA: University of California Press.

34.

Shu, S. , & Huang, J. ( 2003). Spatial configuration and vulnerability of residential burglary. Proceedings of 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 4, 1-46.

35.

Taylor, R. , & Harrell, A. ( 1996). Physical Environment and Crime. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.