The Reliability of Ratings of the Familiarity of Environmental Stimuli

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine the extent to which judges could reliably estimate the familiarity of photographic representations of urban locations. Three factors considered likely to be important in predicting the familiarity of particular locations are identified from the literature: distinctiveness, visibility and regularity of use, and functional or cultural significance. Five expert judges rated 170 locations on four scales of familiarity, and the data were assessed using a generalizability analysis. The principles involved in the interpretation of generalizability coefficients are introduced and the ratings made by the judges were found to be highly reliable. The importance of the three factors as predictors of familiarity is confirmed and contribution of this finding to the operational definition of environmental familiarity is discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANASTASI, A. (1976) Psychological Testing. New York: Macmillan.

APPLEYARD, D. (1976) Planning a Pluralistic City: Conflicting Realities in Ciudad Guayana. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

APPLEYARD, D. (1970) "Styles and methods of structuring a city." Environment and Behavior 2: 100-117.

APPLEYARD, D. (1969) "Why buildings are known: A predictive tool for architects and planners." Environment and Behavior 1: 131-156.

CHALMERS, D. J. (1983) "Environmental sampling, representation, and change: issues in environmental psychology." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Otago.

CRONBACH, L. J. (1951) "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests." Psychometrika 16: 297-334.

CRONBACH, L. J. , G. C. GLESER , H. NANDA , and N. RAJARATNAM (1972) The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. New York: Wiley.

ENDLER, N. S. (1966) "Estimating variance components from mean squares for random and mixed effects analysis of variance models." Perceptual and Motor Skills 22: 559-570.

EVANS, G. W. (1980) "Environmental cognition." Psych. Bull. 88: 259-287.

10.

EVANS, G. W. , D. G. MARRERO , and P. A. BUTLER (1981) "Environmental learning and cognitive mapping." Environment and Behavior 13: 83-104.

11.

EVANS, G. W. , C. SMITH , and K. PEZDEK (1982) "Cognitive maps and urban form." J. of the Amer. Planning Ass. 48: 232-244.

12.

FARRELL, A. D. , M. J. MARIOTTO , A. J. CONGER , J. P. CURRAN , and J. L. WALLANDER (1979) "Self-ratings and judges' ratings of heterosexual social anxiety and skill: A generalizability study." J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47:164-175.

13.

HARRISON, J. D. and W. A. HOWARD (1972) "The role of meaning in the urban image." Environment and Behavior 4: 389-411.

14.

HART, R. and G. T. MOORE (1973) "The development of spatial cognition: A review," pp. 246-288 in R. M. Downs and D. Stea (eds.) Image and Environment. London: Edward Arnold.

15.

HOLAHAN, C. J. and M. J. DOBROWOLNY (1978) "Cognitive and behavioral correlates of the spatial environment: An interactional analysis." Environment and Behavior 10: 317-333.

16.

LYNCH, K. (1960) The image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

17.

MILGRAM, S. , J. GREENWALD , S. KESSLER , W. McKENNA , and J. WATERS (1972) "A psychological map of New York City." Amer. Scientist 60: 194-200.

18.

MILGRAM, S. and D. JODELET (1977) "The way Parisians see Paris." New Society 42: 234-237.

19.

MILGRAM, S. and D. JODELET (1976) "Psychological maps of Paris," pp. 104-124 in H. M. Proshansky et al. (eds.) Environmental Psychology: People and Their Physical Settings. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

20.

SIEGEL, A. W. AND S. H. WHITE (1975) "The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments," pp. 10-55 in H. W. Reese (ed.) Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press.

21.

WATKINS, J. M. , H. B. LEE and O. ERLICH (1980) "Toward adependablemeasure of reflectiorn-irmpulsivity: An application of generalizability theory." J. of Behavioral Assessment 2: 1-16S.

22.

WIGGINS, J. S. (1973) Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

23.

WINER, B. J. (1962) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.