This article resolves the conflict between biological and cultural explanations of aesthetic behavior that is evident in the landscape aesthetics literature. In resolving that conflict, the article combines biological, cultural, and personal bases for aesthetics in a comprehensive paradigm for research in landscape aesthetics. This paradigm is based on Vygotsky's developmental approach to understanding the human mind and human behavior. Vygotsky's method leads to the identification of three fundamental processes of development: phylogenesis (biological evolution), sociogenesis (cultural history), and ontogenesis (individual development). These correspond to three modes of existence-the Umwelt, the Mitwelt, and the Eigenwe/t-Adentified phenomenologically by the existential analysts. These in turn correspond to three modes of aesthetic experience: biological, cultural, and personal. The interrelations of the three modes of aesthetic experience are discussed, with particular emphasis on the biological and cultural modes. It is concluded that each mode has distinct qualities that justify its separate inclusion within the paradigm. Finally, the three modes are characterized as sets of aesthetic constraints and opportunities, labeled laws, rules, and strategies, respectively. Important research directions in landscape aesthetics involve identification and explanation of these constraints and opportunities. The tripartite paradigm promises to be useful in helping to pose important research questions as well as in avoiding conceptual errors in the design of experiments in landscape aesthetics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appleton, J. (1975a). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
2.
Appleton, J. (1975b). Landscape evaluation: The theorefical vacuum. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 66, 120-123.
3.
Appleton, J. (1980). Landscape in the arts and the sciences. Hull, UK: University of Hull.
4.
Bachelard, G. (1969). The poetics of space. Boston: Beacon.
5.
Basch, D. (1972). The uses of aesthetics in planning: A critical review. Joumal of Aesthetic Education, 6(3), 39-55.
6.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1981). Thinking and feeling: A skeptical review. American Psychologist, 36, 99-101.
7.
Bourassa, S. C. (1988). Toward atheory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 241-252.
8.
Bourassa, S. C. (1989). Postmodernism in architecture and planning: What kind of style?Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6, 289-304.
9.
Bunkse, E. V. (1977). Review of The Experience of Landscape, by Jay Appleton. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 67, 149-151.
10.
Butzer, K. W. (1977). Environment, culture, and human evolution. American Scientist, 65, 572-584.
11.
Carter, C. L. (1976). Aesthetic values and human habitation: A philosophical and interdisciplinary approach to landscape aesthetics. In P. Bearse et al. (Eds.), American values and habitat A research agenda (pp. 81-95). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
12.
Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Cooper, C. (1974). The house as a symbol of self. In J. Lang, C. Burnett, W. Moleski, & D. Vachon (Eds.), Designing for human behavior: Architecture and the behavioral sciences (pp. 130-146). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross.
14.
Costonis, J. J. (1982). Law and aesthetics: A critique and a reformulation of the dilemmas. Michigan Law Review, 80, 355-461.
15.
Costonis, J. J. (1989). Icons and aliens: Law, aesthetics, and environmental change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
16.
Dearden, P. (1989). Societal landscape preferences: A pyramid of influences. In P. Dearden & B. Sadler (Eds.), Landscape evaluation: Approaches and applications (Western Geographical Series, Vol. 25, pp. 41-63). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, Department of Geography.
17.
Dewey, J. , (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch.
18.
Eaton, M. M. (1989). Aesthetics and the good life. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses.
19.
Ellenberger, H. F. (1958). A clinical introduction to psychiatric phenomenology and existential analysis. In R. May, E. Angel, & H. F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence: A new dimension in psychiatry and psychology (pp. 92-104). New York: Basic Books.
20.
Gloor, P. (1978). Inputs and outputs of the amygdala: What the amygdala is trying to tell the rest of the brain. In K. E. Livingston & O. Hornykiewicz (Eds.), Limbic mechanisms: The continuing evolution of the limbic system concept (pp. 189-209). New York: Plenum.
21.
Gould, S. J. (1980). Sociobiology and the theory of natural selection. In G. W. Barlow & J. Silverberg (Eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture? Reports, definitions and debate (AAAS Selected Symposium 35, pp. 257-269). Boulder CO: Westview.
22.
Greenbie, B. B. (1973). An ethological approach to community design. In W.F.E. Preiser (Ed.), Environmental design research. Vol. 1: Selected papers (pp. 14-24). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross.
23.
Homans, P. (1979). Jung in context: Modernity and the making of a psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Hume, D. A. (1888). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1740)
25.
Hume, D. A. (1965). Of the standard of taste and other essays. New York: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published in 1757)
26.
Humphrey, N. K. (1970). What the frog's eye tells the monkey's brain. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 3, 324-337.
27.
Humphrey, N. K. (1972). Seeing and nothingness. New Scientist, 53, 682-684.
28.
Izard, C. E. (1984). Emotion-cognition relationships and human development. In C. E.
29.
Izard, J. Kagan , & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 17-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Jeans, D. N. (1977). Review of The Experience of Landscape, by JayAppleton. Australian Geographer, 13, 345-346.
31.
Jung, C. G. (1928). Contributions to analytical psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
32.
Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. New York: Pantheon.
33.
Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
34.
Kaplan, R. , & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature:A psychologicalperspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3-32.
36.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R. , & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
38.
Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art. New York: Scribner's.
39.
Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37,1019-1024.
40.
Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124-129.
41.
Livingstone, F. B. (1980). Cultural causes of genetic change. In G. W. Barlow &J. Silverberg (Eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture? Reports, definitions and debate (AAAS Selected Symposium 35, pp. 307-329). Boulder, CO: Westview.
42.
Macia, A. (1979). Visual perception of landscape: Sex and personality differences. In G. H. Elsner & R. C. Smardon (Eds.), Proceedings of Our National Landscape: A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource (USDA Forest Service Technical Report PSW-35, pp. 279-285). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
43.
MacLean, P. D. (1958a). Contrasting functions of limbic and neocortical systems of the brain and their relevance to psychophysiological aspects of medicine. American Journal of Medicine, 25, 611-626.
44.
MacLean, P. D. (1958b). The limbic system with respect to self-preservation and the preservation of the species. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 127, 1-11.
45.
MacLean, P. D. (1959). The limbic system with respect to two basic life principles. In M.A.B. Brazier (Ed.), The central nervous system and behavior (pp. 31-118). New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.
46.
MacLean, P. D. (1962). New findings relevant to the evolution of the psychosexual functions of the brain. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 135, 289-301.
47.
MacLean, P. D. (1973a). The brain's generation gap: Some human implications. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 8, 113-127.
48.
MacLean, P. D. (1973b). Man's limbic brain and the psychoses. In T. J. Boag & D. Campbell (Eds.), A triune concept of brain and behaviour (pp. 23-41). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
49.
MacLean, P. D. (1973c). Man's reptilian and limbic inheritance. In T. J. Boag & D. Campbell (Eds.), A triune concept of brain and behaviour (pp. 6-22). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
50.
MacLean, P. D. (1973d). New trends in man's evolution. In T. J. Boag & D. Campbell (Eds.), A triune concept of brain and behaviour (pp. 42-60). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
51.
May, R. (1958a). Contributions of existential psychotherapy, In R. May, E. Angel, & H. F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence: A new dimension in psychiatry and psychology (pp. 37-91). New York: Basic Books.
52.
May, R. (1958b). The origins and significance of the existential movement in psychology. In R. May, E. Angel, & H. F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence: A new dimension in psychiatry and psychology (pp. 3-36). New York: Basic Books.
53.
Meyer, L. B. (1979). Toward a theory of style. In B. Lang (Ed.), The concept of style (pp. 3-44). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
54.
Midgley, M. (1978). Beast and man: The roots of human nature. Hassocks, UK: Harvester Press.
55.
Moore, R. Y. (1973). Retinohypothalamic projection in mammals: A comparative study. Brain Research, 49, 403-409.
56.
Moreland, R. L. , & Zajonc, R. B. (1977). Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,35, 191-199.
57.
Paillard, J. , Michel, F., & Stelmach G. (1983). Localization without content: A tactile analogue of "blind sight."Archives of Neurology, 40, 548-551.
58.
Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (1981). Fluctuating fortunes in gauging landscape value. Progress in Human Geography, 5, 25-41.
59.
Porteous, J. D. (1982). Urban environmental aesthetics. In B. Sadler & A. Carlson (Eds.), Environmental aesthetics: Essays in interpretation (Western Geographical Series, Vol. 20, pp. 67-95). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, Department of Geography.
60.
Priestley, T. (1983). The field of visual analysis and resource management: A bibliographic analysis and perspective. Landscape Journal, 2, 52-59.
61.
Punter, J. V. (1982). Landscape aesthetics: A synthesis and critique. In J. R. Gold & J. Burgess (Eds.), Valued environments (pp. 100-123). London: Allen & Unwin.
62.
Rappaport, R. A. (1986). Desecrating the holy woman: Derek Freeman's attack on Margaret Mead. American Scholar, 55, 313-347.
63.
Sancar, F. H. (1985). Towards theory generation in landscape aesthetics. Landscape Journal, 4,116-123.
64.
Scribner, S. (1985). Vygotsky's uses of history. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119-145). New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Seamon, J. G. , Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983a). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaming, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 544-555.
66.
Seamon, J. G. , Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983b). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: 2. Effect of delay between study and test. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 187-189.
67.
Seamon, J. G. , Marsh, R. L., & Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 465-469.
68.
Silverberg, J. (1980). Sociobiology, the new synthesis? An anthropologist's perspective. In G. W. Barlow & J. Silverberg (Eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture? Reports, definitions and debate (AAAS Selected Symposium 35, pp. 25-74). Boulder, CO: Westview.
69.
Smith, P. F. (1977). The syntax of cities. London: Hutchinson.
70.
Tomkins, S. S. (1981). The quest for primary motives: Biography and autobiography of an idea. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 306-329.
71.
Toulmin, S. (1978). The Mozart of psychology. New York Review of Books, 25(14), 51-57.
72.
Tyng, A. G. (1969). Geometric extensions of consciousness. Zodiac, 19, 130-162.
73.
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 86-125). New York: Plenum.
74.
Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44.
75.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981a). The development of higher forms of attention. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 189-240). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
77.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981b). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
78.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981c). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134-143). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
79.
Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82.
Wilson, W. R. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 811-821.
83.
Wohlwill, J. F. (1976). Environmental aesthetics: The environment as a source of affect. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 37-86). New York: Plenum.
84.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35,151-175.
85.
Zajonc, R. B. (1981). A one-factor mind about mind and emotion. American Psychologist, 36, 102-103.
86.
Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117-123.
87.
Zube, E. H. (1974). Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description and evaluation of landscape resources. Environment and Behavior, 6, 69-89.
88.
Zube, E. H. (1984). Themes in landscape assessment theory. Landscape Journal, 3, 104-110.
89.
Zube, E. H. , Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9,1-33.
