Navigating through an environment and viewing a map of that environment can result in different types of cognitive representation. Maps are typically encoded in the same onentation that they are viewed, while navigation results in an orientation-free representation. The present study concerns the orientation specificity of spatial knowledge following navigation in a computer-simulated space. Subjects either explored a simulated 3-D environment by navigating through it, or were presented with a map-like single orientation plan view of the same environment. When asked to indicate the direction of test objects that were not directly visible from within the simulation, response latencies suggested that the navigafton group had an orientation-free representation while the map group had an orientation-specific representation. We conclude that navigation in computer-simulated space and real space lead to similar kinds of spatial knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, G. L. (1981). A developmental perspective on the effects of "subdividing" macrospatial experience. Joumal of Experimental Psychology: Human Leaming and Memory, 7,120-132.
2.
Blades, M. , & Spencer, C. (1987). Young children's strategies when using maps with landmarks. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 201-217.
3.
Cornell, E. H. , & Hay, D. H. (1984). Children's acquisition of a route via different media. Environmentand Behavior, 16, 627-641.
4.
Evans, G. W. , & Pezdek, K. (1980). Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information. Joumal of Experimental Psychology: Human Leaming and Memory, 6,, 13-24.
5.
Gale, N. , Golledge, R. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Doherty, S. (1990). The acquisition and integration of route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 3-25.
6.
Hirtle, S. C. , & Hudson, J. (1991). Acquisition of spatial knowledge for routes. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 335-345.
7.
Hunt, M. E. (1984). Environmental learning without being there. Environment and Behavior, 16, 307-334.
8.
Just, M. A. , & Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137-171.
9.
Levine, M. (1982). You are here maps: Psychological considerations. Environment and Behavior, 14, 221-237.
10.
Levine, M. , Jankovic, I. N., & Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Joumal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 157-175.
11.
Levine, M. , Marchon, I., & Hanley, G. (1984). The placement and misplacement of you-are-here maps. Environment and Behavior,16, 139-157.
12.
MacEachren, A. M. (1992). Learning spatial information from maps: Can onentation specificity be overcome?Professional Geographer, 44, 431-443.
13.
May, M. , Peruch, R, & Savoyant, A. (in press). Navigating in a virtual environment with map acquired knowledge: Encoding and alignment effects. Ecological Psychology.
14.
Murray, J. E. , Jolicoeur, R, McMullen, P. A., & Ingleton, M. (1993). Oientation-invarient transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory and Cognition, 21, 604-610.
15.
O'Neill, M. J. (1992). Effects of familiarity and plan complexity on wayfinding in simulated buildings. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 319-327.
16.
Palij, M. , Levine, M., & Kahan, T. (1984). The orientation of cognifive maps. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 105-108.
17.
Peruch, R , & Lapin, E. A. (1993). Route knowledge in different spatial frames of reference. Acta Psychologica, 84, 253-269.
18.
Presson, C. C. (1987). The development of spatial cognition: Secondary uses of spatial information. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Contemporary topics in developmental psychology (pp. 77-112). New York: John Wiley.
19.
Presson, C. C. , DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1987). Orientation specificity in kinesthefic spatial learning: The role of multiple orientations. Memoryand Cognition, 15, 225-229.
20.
Presson, C. C. , DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path?Joumal of Experimental Psychology: Leaming, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887-897.
21.
Presson, C. C. , & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Joumal of Experimental Psychology: Leaming, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 716-722.
22.
Presson, C. C. , & Somerville, S. C. (1985). Beyond egocentrism: A new look at the beginnings of spatial representation. In H. Wellman (Ed.), The development of children's spatial search (pp. 1-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Regian, J. W. , Shebilske, W. L., & Monk, J. M. (1992). Virtual reality: An instructional medium for visual spatial tasks. Joumal of Communication, 42,136-149.
24.
Roberts, R. J., Jr. , & Aman, C. J. (1993). Developmental differences in giving directions: Spatial frames of reference and mental rotation. Child Development, 64, 1258-1270.
25.
Rossano, M. J. , & Warren, D. H. (1989). Misaligned maps lead to predictable errors. Perception, 18, 215-229.
26.
Shepard, R. N. , & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transfornations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
Shepard, R. N. , & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrmination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161-193.
28.
Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaming, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615-628.
29.
Thorndyke, R W. , & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982) Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560-589.
30.
Tlauka, M. , & Wilson, R N. (1994). The effect of landmarks on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 305-313.
31.
Warren, D. H. (1994). Self-localization on plan and oblique maps. Environment and Behavior, 26,71-98.
32.
Warren, D. H. , Rossano, M. J., & Wear, T. D. (1990) Perception of map-environment correspondence: The roles of features and alignment. Ecological Psychology, 2, 131-150.
33.
Warren, D. H. , & Scott, T. E. (1993). Map alignment in travelling multisegment routes. Environment and Behavior, 25, 643-666.
34.
Warren, D. H. , Scott, T. E., & Medley, C. (1992). Finding locations in the environment: The map as mediator. Perception, 21, 671-689.
35.
Wilson, R N. , & Foreman, N. (1993). Transfer of information from virtual to real space: Implications for people with physical disability. Eurographics Technical Report Series, EG93, 21-25.
