This study provides quantitative conclusions regarding the impact of specific exogenous factors on exhibit viewing time in zoological parks and discusses implications for exhibit design. Three features distinguish this analysis from previous research concerning viewing time: (a) Data collection was preceded by extensive field work, to identify more than 50 variables with potential effects on viewing time; (b) the results of ethnographic interview techniques were combined with on-site observation and objective data to quantify and scale relevant variables; and (c) multiple regression techniques were used to quantify and test unique quantitative effects of independent variables on observed viewing time. The analysis compares recorded viewing times of 501 individuals across 10 exhibits at six zoological parks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums. (1994). A profile of zoological parks. Bethesda, MD: Author.
2.
Bitgood, S. , & Benefield, A. (1987). Visitor behavior: A comparison across zoos (Technical Report No. 8620). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design, Jacksonville State University.
3.
Bitgood, S. , Benefield, A., Patterson, D., Lewis, D., & Landers, A. (1985). Zoo visitors: Can we make them behave? Paper presented at the annual American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Conference, Columbus, OH.
4.
Bitgood, S. , Patterson, D., & Benefield, A. (1988). Exhibit design and visitor behavior: Empirical relationships. Environment and Behavior,20, 474-491.
5.
Bitgood, S. , Patterson, D., Benefield, A., & Landers, A. (1986). Understanding your visitors: Ten factors influencing visitor behavior. Paper presented at the annual American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
6.
Falk, J. H. , Koran, J. J., Dierking, L. D., & Dreblow, L. (1985). Predicting visitor behavior. Curator, 28, 249-257.
7.
Finlay, T. , Lawrence, J. R., & Maple, T. L. (1988). People's perceptions of animals: The influence of the zoo environment. Environment and Behavior, 20, 508-528.
8.
Goldberger, A. S. (1968). The interpretation and estimation of Cobb-Douglas functions. Econometrica, 35, 464-472.
9.
Hoff, M. P. , & Maple, T. L. (1982). Sex and age differences in the avoidance of reptile exhibits by zoo visitors. Zoo Biology, 1, 263-269.
10.
Johnston, R. J. , Weaver, T. F., Smith, L. A., & Swallow, S. K. (1995). Contingent valuation focus groups: Insights from ethnographic interview techniques.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 24, 56-69.
11.
Judge, G. G. , Hill, C. R., Griffiths, W. E., Lutkepohl, H., & Lee, T. C. (1988). Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Kennedy, P. (1992). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Lardaro, L. (1993). Applied econometrics. New York: HarperCollins.
14.
Lessow, D. E. (1990). Visitor perceptions of natural habitat zoo exhibits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
15.
Marcellini, D. L. , & Jenssen, T. A. (1988). Visitor behavior in the National Zoo's reptile house. Zoo Biology, 7, 329-338.
16.
Patterson, D. , & Bitgood, S. (1987). Exhibit design with the visitor in mind (Technical Report No. 8740A). Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design, Jacksonville State University.
17.
Rhoads, D. L. , & Goldsworthy, R. J. (1979). The effects of zoo environments of public attitudes toward endangered wildlife. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 13, 283-287.
18.
Rotton, J. , Shats, M., & Standers, R. (1990). Temperature and pedestrian tempo: Walking without awareness. Environment and Behavior, 22, 650-674.
19.
Shettel-Neuber, J. (1985). The Whittier Southeast Asian exhibits: A post-occupancy evaluation and comparison with older exhibits (Technical Report No. 86-80). Jacksonville, AL: Psychology Institute, Jacksonville State University.
20.
Shettel-Neuber, J. (1988). Second and thirdgeneration zoo exhibits: A comparison of visitor, staff, and animal responses. Environment and Behavior, 20, 452-473.
21.
Smith, V. K. , Desvousges, W. H., & McGivney, M. P. (1983). The opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models. Land Economics, 59, 259-278.
22.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23.
Stynes, D. J. , Peterson, G. L., & Rosenthal, D. H. (1986). Log transformation bias in estimating travel cost models. Land Economics, 62, 94-103.
24.
Wolf, R. L. , & Tymitz, B. L. (1981). Studying visitor perceptions of zoo environments: A naturalistic view. In P.J.S. Olney (Ed.), 1981 international zoo yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 49-53). London: Zoological Society of London.
25.
Ziemer, R. , Musser, W. N., & Hill, R. C. (1980). Recreational demand equations: Functional form and consumer surplus. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 136-141.
