Subcultural and Cross-Cultural Effects on the Experience of Detached Houses

Abstract

Two experiments are reported using variations in house style as a means of investigating two cognitively based theories of affective experience of the environment and cultural differences in environmental experience. In the first experiment, groups of participants with three differing backgrounds but from the same geographic location (Australia) judged the familiarity, typicality, preference, and interest of six house styles. In the second experiment, two age groups from a different culture and geographic location (Italy) made the same set of judgments about the same experimental stimuli. Systematic similarities and differences were found in the first experiment between the groups as a function of house style. In the second experiment, differences were found between the two age groups of Italian participants. Unexpected similarities were found, however, between both age groups from Italy and the Australian groups. These results are related to the two models of affective experience, and their implications for the models are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Billington, R. , Strawbridge, S. , Greensides, L. , & Fitzsimons, A. (1991). Culture and society: A sociology of culture. London: Macmillan.

Devlin, K. (1990). An examination of architectural interpretation: Architects versus nonarchitects. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7, 235-243.

Devlin, K. , & Nasar, J. L. (1989). The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of “high” versus “popular” residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 333-344.

Gans, H. J. (1978). Towards a human architecture: A sociological view of the profession. Journal of Architectural Education, 2, 28-31.

Gärling, T. , & Evans, G. W. (Eds.). (1991). Environment, cognition, and action: An integrated approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gaver, W. W. , & Mandler, G. (1987). Play it again, Sam: On liking music. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 259-282.

Groat, L. (1982). Meaning in postmodern architecture: An examination using a multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 3-22.

Michelson, W. (1968, July-August). People don't want what architects want. Trans-Action, pp. 37-43.

Munsinger, H. , & Kessen, W. (1964). Uncertainty, structure, and preference. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78, 1-24.

10.

Nasar, J. , & Purcell, A. T. (1990). Beauty and the beast extended: Knowledge structure and evaluations of houses by Australian architect and nonarchitect students. In H. Pamir , V. Imamoglu , & N. Teymur (Eds.), Culture, space, history: Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Association for the People and Their Physical Environment (Vol. 1, pp. 169-171). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.

11.

Purcell, A. T. (1986). Environmental perception and affect: A schema discrepancy model. Environment and Behavior, 18, 3-30.

12.

Purcell, A. T. (1987). Landscape perception, preference and schema discrepancy. Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design, 14, 67-92.

13.

Purcell, A. T. (1992). Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of the landscape. Journal of Environmental Management, 34, 159-177.

14.

Purcell, A. T. (1995). Experiencing American and Australian high and popular style houses. Environment and Behavior, 27, 771-800.

15.

Purcell, A. T. , & Nasar, J. (1990). Australian architect and nonarchitect students' experiences of American houses. In L. Halasz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Association for Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 237-240). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Science.

16.

Purcell, A. T. , & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Experiencing other peoples' houses: A model of similarities and differences in environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 199-211.

17.

Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

18.

Smith, J. D. , & Melara, R. J. (1990). Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: `Tis the gift to be simple. Cognition, 34, 279-298.

19.

Whitfield, T.W.A. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 221-237.

20.

Whitfield, T.W.A. , & Slater, P. E. (1979). The effects of categorisation and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 65-75.

21.

Whitfield, T.W.A. , & Wiltshire, J. (1982). Design training and aesthetic evaluation: An intergroup comparison. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 109-117.

22.

Wilson, M. A. (1996). The socialisation of architectural preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 33-44.