The Motivation and Social Orientation of Visitors Attending a Contemporary Zoological Park

Abstract

Zoological parks are considered to be the most important source of contact between people and animals in modern society. Charged with the dual responsibility of caring for animals and people, zoos need information regarding both aspects of their mission statement. This article describes zoo visitors in relation to their primary motivation (educational vs. recreational) and social orientation (intrinsic vs. altruistic). These components were isolated and compared using t tests for dependent measures. Educational, recreational, intrinsic, and altruistic reasons were found to be statistically significant, thus yielding multiple satisfactions associated with a zoological park. Contemporary zoos may not recognize the value of conducting social research or the importance of meeting visitors’ needs. However, in order to broaden their base of political and financial support, zoos should attempt to increase public benefits.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andereck, K. , & Caldwell, L. (1994). Motive-based segmentation of a public zoological park market. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12, 19-31.

Bendiner, R. (1981). The fall of the wild, the rise of the zoo. New York: E. P. Dutton.

Birney, B. (1986). Comparing exhibit influences on children’s knowledge of wildlife as a result of field trips to a zoo versus natural history museum. AAZPA Annual Proceedings, pp. 337-389.

Birney, B. (1988). Brookfield zoo’s “flying walk” exhibit. Environment and Behavior, 20, 416-434.

Bitgood, S. , Patterson, D. , & Benefield, A. (1988). Exhibit design and visitor behavior. Environment and Behavior, 20, 474-491.

Blakely, R. (1981). Formulating an exhibit philosophy. In P.J.S. Olney (Ed.), International zoo yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 1-5). London: The Zoological Society of London.

Brody, P. (1981). The LINKS-ZOO: A recreational/educational facility for the future. In P.J.S. Olney (Ed.), International zoo yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 63-68). London: The Zoological Society of London.

Cherfas, J. (1984). Zoo 2,000: A look beyond the bars. London: British Broadcasting Corp.

Conway, W. (1969). Zoos: Their changing roles. Science, 163, 48-52.

10.

Crompton, J. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research, 6, 408-424.

11.

Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.

12.

Dolsen, D. , & Machlis, G. (1991). Response rates and mail recreation surveys: How much is enough? Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 272-277.

13.

Field, D. , & Wagar, J. (1973). Visitor groups and interpretation in parks and other outdoor leisure settings. Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 12-17.

14.

Gunter, B. (1987). The leisure experience: Selected properties. Journal of Leisure Research, 19, 115-130.

15.

Harris, L. (1995). Recreation in a zoo environment: Applying animal behavior research techniques to understand how visitors allocate time. Legacy, 6, 14-18.

16.

Kellert, S. (1979). Zoological parks in American society. AAZPA Annual Proceedings, pp. 88-126.

17.

Lyons, J. (1987). Basic and applied social research needs in wildlife management. In D. Decker & G. Goff (Eds.), Valuing wildlife: Economic and social perspectives (pp. 285-295). Boulder, CO: Westview.

18.

Rhoades, D. , & Goldsworthy, R. (1979). The effects of zoo environments on public attitudes toward endangered wildlife. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 13, 283-287.

19.

Roggenbuck, J. , Loomis, R. , & Dagastino, J. (1990). The learning benefits of leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 112-124.

20.

Serrell, B. (1981). The role of zoological parks and aquariums in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 12, 41-42.

21.

Shaw, W. (1987). The recreational benefits of wildlife to people. In D. Decker & G. Goff (Eds.), Valuing wildlife: Economic and social perspectives (pp. 208-213). Boulder, CO: Westview.

22.

Sunquist, F. (1995). End of the ark? International Wildlife, 25, 23-29.

23.

Verderber, S. , Gardner, L. , Islam, D. , & Nakanishi, L. (1988). Elderly persons’ appraisal of the zoological park. Environment and Behavior, 20, 492-507.

24.

White, J. , & Marcellini, D. (1986). HERPlab: A family learning centre at the National Zoological Park. In P.J.S. Olney (Ed.), International zoo yearbook (Vol. 24/25, pp. 340-343). London: The Zoological Society of London.

25.

Wolf, R. , & Tymitz, B. (1981). Studying visitor perceptions of zoo environments: A naturalistic view. In P.J.S. Olney (Ed.), International zoo yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 49-53). London: The Zoological Society of London.