Looking outside and inside: Self-Concept Development of Gifted Adolescents

Abstract

The internal/external frame of reference model (Marsh, 1986) was proposed to explain the development of academic self-concepts for general ability samples. Recent research calls into question the model's applicability for gifted adolescents' academic self-concept development. This model was examined for 131 adolescents participating in a summer program for academically talented students. Results suggest that the model is useful in understanding the academic self-concept development of students who are gifted, with no significant differences among students with demonstrable strengths in mathematics, verbal areas, or both areas. Educators should be aware that exceptional performance in one area, such as mathematics, will probably have a positive impact in mathematics self-concept but a negative impact on other academic self-concepts, such as verbal self-concept.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ablard

K. E.

Lipschultz

R. E.

(1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94–101.

Bong

(1998). Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 102–110.

Brody

L. E.

Benbow

C. P.

(1986). Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning. Journal of Youth and Ad8.7.

Pelton

Bassin

G. M.

Landrum

L. E.

Ramsay

Cooley

S. G.

Lynch

M. R.K. A.

Hamrick

(1990). Self-concept and peer status among gifted program youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 456–461.

Cotterell

J. L.

(1992). The relation of attachments and supports to adolescent well-being and school adjustment. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 28–42.

Dauber

S. L.

Benbow

C. P.

(1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 10–15.

Dixon

F. A.

(1998). Social and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 80–94.

Erikson

E. H.

(1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.*

Feldhusen

J. F.

Kolloff

M. B.

(1981). Me: A self-concept scale for gifted students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 319–323.

10.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–148.

11.

Gallagher

Harradine

C. C.

Coleman

M. R.

(1997). Challenge or boredom? Gifted students' views on their schooling. Roeper Review, 19, 132–136.

12.

Hansen

J. B.

Hall

E. G.

(1985). Self-concept gains by gifted middle school students during a summer program. Roeper Review, 7, 170–175.

13.

Harter

(1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.

14.

Harter

(1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In Suls

Greenwald

A. G.

(Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3, pp. 137–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.*

15.

Henry

Moffitt

T. E.

Silva

P. A.

McGee

(1991). Anxiety and cognitive task performance: A longitudinal perspective. Child Study Journal, 21, 167–183.

16.

Hoge

R. D.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449–465.

17.

Janos

P. M.

Robinson

N. M.

(1985). The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 175–179.

18.

Kelly

K. R.

Jordan

L. K.

(1990). Effects of academic achievement and gender on academic and social self-concept: A replication study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 173–177.

19.

Kulik

J. A.

Kulik

C. L.

(1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73–77.

20.

Lupkowski-Shoplik

Swiatek

M. A.

(1999). Elementary student talent searches: Establishing appropriate guidelines for quality test scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 265–272.

21.

Luthar

S. S.

Zigler

Goldstein

(1992). Psychosocial adjustment among intellectually gifted adolescents: The role of cognitive-developmental and experiential factors. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 33, 361–373.

22.

Marsh

H. W.

(1984). Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results. Australian Journal of Education, 28, 165–181.

23.

Marsh

H. W.

(1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149.

24.

Marsh

H. W.

(1991). Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445–480.

25.

Marsh

H. W.

(1992). Self-Description Questionnaire-II manual. Cambellton, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.*

26.

Marsh

H. W.

Byrne

B. M.

Shavelson

R. J.

(1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366–380.

27.

Marsh

H. W.

Chessor

Craven

Roche

(1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285–319.

28.

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

J. W.

(1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213–231.

29.

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

J. W.

Barnes

(1985). Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex, and academic measures. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 422–444.

30.

Marsh

H. W.

Shavelson

(1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125.

31.

Marsh

H. W.

Smith

I. D.

Barnes

(1985). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 581–596.

32.

Marsh

H. W.

Yeung

A. S.

(1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 705–738.

33.

Nail

J. M.

Evans

J. G.

(1997). The emotional adjustment of gifted adolescents: A view of global functioning. Roeper Review, 20, 18–21.

34.

Nelson

(1984). The relationship between dimensions of classroom and family environments and the self-concept, satisfaction, and achievement of grade 7 and 8 students. Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 276–287.

35.

Norman

A. D.

Ramsay

S. G.

Martray

C. R.

Roberts

J. L.

(1999). Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment. Roeper Review, 22, 5–9.

36.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(1997). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 180–188). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.*

37.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(1998). Talent search. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 106–113.

38.

Olszewski

Kulieke

M. J.

Willis

G. B.

(1987). Changes in the self-perceptions of gifted students who participate in rigorous academic programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 287–303.

39.

Pajares

Graham

(1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139.

40.

Plucker

J. A.

(1998). Gender, race, and grade differences in gifted adolescents' coping strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 423–436.

41.

Plucker

J. A.

McIntire

(1996). Academic survivability in high potential, middle school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 7–14.

42.

Plucker

J. A.

Taylor

J. W.

Callahan

C. M. V.

Tomchin

E. M.

(1997). Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Reliability and validity evidence for the Self-Description Questionnaire II with gifted students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 704–713.

43.

Pyryt

M. C.

Mendaglio

(1994). The multidimensional self-concept: A comparison of gifted and average-ability adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 299–305.

44.

Reis

S. M.

(1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 162–70.

45.

Renick

M. J.

Harter

(1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 631–638.

46.

Richardson

T. M.

Benbow

C. P.

(1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 464–470.

47.

Ross

Parker

(1980). Academic and social self concepts of the academically gifted. Exceptional Children, 47, 6–11.

48.

Schneider

B. H.

Clegg

M. R.

Byrne

B. M.

Ledingham

J. E.

Crombie

(1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 48–56.

49.

Skaalvik

E. M.

Rankin

R. J.

(1990). Math, verbal, and general academic self-concept: The internal/external frame of reference model and gender differences in self-concept structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 546–554.

50.

Skaalvik

E. M.

Rankin

R. J.

(1992). Math and verbal achievement and self-concepts: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 267–279.

51.

Skaalvik

E. M.

Rankin

R. J.

(1995). A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of math and verbal self-perception. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 161–184.

52.

Stocking

V. B.

(1998). “What I did on my vacation”: Summer options for gifted students. NASSP Bulletin, 82 (595), 93–100.

53.

Strein

(1993). Advances in research on academic self-concept: Implications for school psychology. School Psychology Review, 22, 273–284.

54.

Swiatek

M. A.

Benbow

C. P.

(1991). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 138–150.

55.

Van Boxtel

H. W.

Monks

F. J.

(1992). General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 169–188.

56.

Williams

J. E.

Montgomery

(1995). Using frame of reference theory to understand the self-concept of academically able students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 400–409.

57.

Zeidner

Schleyer

E. J.

(1999). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305–329.