The Mobility Opportunities Via Education (MOVE®) Curriculum is a functional mobility curriculum for individuals with severe disabilities. This study investigated the effects of the MOVE Curriculum on the functional walking skills of five elementary-aged students with severe, multiple disabilities. The MOVE Curriculum was implemented using a multiple-baseline across subjects design. Repeated measures were taken during baseline, intervention, and maintenance phases for each participant. All students demonstrated progress in taking reciprocal steps during either intervention or maintenance. Results for each participant are discussed as well as implications and future directions for research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtwaterS. W. (1991). Should the normal motor developmental sequence be used as a theoretical model in pediatric physical therapy? In ListerJ. M. (Ed.), Contemporary management of motor control problems: Proceedings of the II Step Conference (pp. 89–93). Alexandria, VA: The Foundation for Physical Therapy.
2.
BarnesS. B. (1999). The MOVE Curriculum: An application of contemporary theories of physical therapy and education. (Doctoral dissertation, University of West Florida, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 9981950.
3.
Beirne-SmithM.IttenbachR. F.PattonJ. R. (2002). Mental retardation. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BidabeD. L.BarnesS. B.WhinneryK. W. (2001). M.O.V.E.: Raising expectations for individuals with severe disabilities. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 19 (2), 31–48.
5.
BrownL.BransonM. B.Hamre-NietupskiS.PumpianI.CertoN.GruenewaldL. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age-appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. The Journal of Special Education, 13 (1), 81–90.
6.
ButterfieldN.ArthurM. (1995). Shifting the focus: Emerging priorities in communication programming for students with a severe intellectual disability. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30 (1), 41–50.
7.
CampbellP. H.McInerneyW. F.CooperM. A. (1984). Therapeutic programming for students with severe handicaps. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38 (9), 594–602.
8.
Community Playthings. (1999). Rifton equipment (Catalog). Rifton, NY: Community Products LLC.
9.
CraigS. E.HaggartA. G.HullK. M. (1999). Integrating therapies into the educational setting: Strategies for supporting children with severe disabilities. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 17 (2), 91–109.
10.
DunnW. (1989). Integrated related services for preschoolers with neurological impairments: Issues and strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 10 (3), 31–39.
11.
FettersL. (1991). Cerebral palsy: Contemporary treatment concepts. In ListerJ. M. (Ed.), Contemporary management of motor control problems: Proceedings of the II Step Conference (pp. 219–224). Alexandria, VA: The Foundation for Physical Therapy.
12.
GallM. D.BorgW. R.GallJ. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.*
13.
GiangrecoM. F. (1986). Effects of integrated therapy: A pilot study. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11 (3), 205–208.
14.
HarrisS. R. (1991). Functional abilities in context. In ListerJ. M. (Ed.), Contemporary management of motor control problems: Proceedings of the II Step Conference (pp. 253–259). Alexandria, VA: The Foundation for Physical Therapy.
15.
KammK.ThelenE.JensenJ. L. (1990). A dynamical systems approach to motor development. Physical Therapy, 70, 763–775.
16.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford.
17.
Kern County Superintendent of Schools. (1999). MOVE: Mobility Opportunities Via Education. Bakers-field, CA: Author.
18.
KratochwillT. R.WilliamsB. L. (1988). Perspectives on pitfalls and hassles in single-subject research. Journal for The Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13 (3), 147–154.
19.
McEwenI. R.SheldenM. L. (1995). Pediatric therapy in the 1990's: The demise of the educational versus medical dichotomy. Occupational and Physical Therapy in Educational Environments, 15 (2), 33–45.
20.
OreloveF. P.SobseyD. (1996). Educating children with multiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
21.
RainforthB.York-BarrJ. (1997). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
22.
SheldenM. L. (1998). Invited commentary. Physical Therapy, 78, 948–949.
23.
TawneyJ. W.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
