This article presents quality indicators for experimental and quasi-experimental studies for special education. These indicators are intended not only to evaluate the merits of a completed research report or article but also to serve as an organizer of critical issues for consideration in research. We believe these indicators can be used widely, from assisting in the development of research plans to evaluating proposals. In this article, the framework and rationale is explained by providing brief descriptions of each indicator. Finally, we suggest a standard for determining whether a practice may be considered evidence-based. It is our intent that this standard for evidenced-based practice and the indicators be reviewed, revised as needed, and adopted by the field of special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoruchR. F. (1997). Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BottgeB. A.HeinrichsM.MehtaZ. D.Ya-HuiH. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 35, 186–200.
3.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
CooperH.HedgesL. V. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM.MoodyS. W. (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65, 399–415.
7.
FabesR. A.MatrinC. L.HanishL. D.UpdegraffK. A. (2000). Criteria for evaluating the significance of developmental research in the twenty-first century: Force and counterforce. Child Development, 71, 212–221.
8.
FerrettiR. P.MacArthurC. D.OkoloC. M. (2001). Teaching for historical understanding in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 59–71.
9.
FeuerM. J.TowneL.ShavelsonR. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31, 4–14.
10.
FornessS.KavaleK. A.BlumI. M.LloydJ. W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 29, 4–9.
11.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 126–137.
12.
GallM. D.BorgW. R.GallJ. P. (2002). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
13.
GerstenR.BakerS.LloydJ. W. (2000). Designing high quality research in special education: Group experimental design. Journal of Special Education, 34, 2–18.
14.
GerstenR.BakerS.Smith-JohnsonJ.PetersonA.DiminoJ. (in press). Eyes on the prize: Teaching history to students with learning disabilities in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children.
15.
GerstenR.SchillerE. P.VaughnS. (Eds.). (2000). Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.Beebe-Franken-BergerM. E.BocianK. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198–205.
17.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. (ShavelsonR. J.TowneL., Eds.), Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psycholmetric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
20.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for general causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
SimmermanS.SwansonH. L. (2001). Treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: How important are internal and external validity?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 221–236.
22.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277–321.
23.
ValentineJ. C.CooperH. (2003). What Works Clearinghouse Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Version 1.0). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24.
WalbergH. J. (1986). Synthesis of research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 214–229). New York: Macmillan.
