The authors trace changes in conceptions of special education teacher quality and preparation in response to developments in special education research, policy, and practice. This developmental arc is a backdrop for understanding contemporary special education practice and charting future directions for preparing special education teachers. Federal policy, and recent research on teaching and learning, and the response-to-intervention (RTI) movement require a shift in thinking about how to prepare quality special education teachers and the expertise they need to be effective. To function effectively in RTI and fulfill federal highly qualified teacher requirements, special education teachers must master an increasingly complex knowledge base and sophisticated repertoire of instructional practices. The authors contend that preservice preparation is inadequate for this purpose and that preparation for special education teaching should build upon an existing knowledge base and demonstrated competence in classroom practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderP. A. (2003). Can we get there from here?Educational Researcher, 32 (8), 3–4.
2.
AlexanderP. A.BuehlM. M.SperlC. T.FivesH. (2004). Modeling domain learning: Profiles from the field of special education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 545–557.
3.
ArterJ. A.JenkinsJ. R. (1979). Differential diagnosis-prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–555.
4.
ArtilesA. J.TrentS. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 410–437.
5.
BakerJ. M.ZigmondN. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities?Exceptional Children, 56, 515–526.
6.
BakerJ. M.ZigmondN. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 163–180.
7.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
8.
BereiterC.EngelmannS. (1966). Teaching disadvantaged children in the preschool. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
BirchJ. W.ReynoldsM. C. (1982). Special education as a profession. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2 (4), 1–13.
10.
BlantonL.GriffinC.WinnJ.PugachM. (1997). Teacher education in transition. Denver, CO: Love.
11.
BlantonL.SindelarP. T.CorreaV.HardmanM.McDonnellJ.KuhelK. (2003). Conceptions of beginning teacher quality: Models of conducting research. (COPSSE Document Number RS-6). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
BrophyJ. E. (1979). Teacher behavior and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 733–750.
14.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483 (1954).
15.
BrownellM. T.HaagerD.BishopA. G.KlingnerJ.K.MenonS.PenfieldR.DingleM. (2007, April). Teacher quality in special education: The role of knowledge, classroom practice, and school environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting for American Education Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
16.
CarlbergC.KavaleK. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.
17.
ChristoplosF.ValletuttiP. (1972). A noncategorical and field-competency model for teacher preparation in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 6, 115–120.
18.
ConleyM. W. (2008). Improving adolescent comprehension: Developing comprehension strategies in the content areas. In IsraelS. E.DuffyG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 531–550). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
19.
ConnorF. P. (1976). The past is prologue: Teacher preparation in special education. Exceptional Children, 42, 366–378.
20.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1966). Professional standards for personnel in the education of exceptional children. Professional standards project report. Arlington, VA: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED017085).
DenoE. (1970). Forum: Special education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children, 37, 229–237.
23.
DenoS. L.MarstonD.TindalG. (1986). Direct and frequent curriculum-based measurement: An alternative for educational decision making. Special Services in the Schools, 2, 5–27.
24.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
25.
DentonC. A.VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201–211.
DuffyH. (2007). Meeting the needs of significantly struggling learners in high school: A look at approaches to tiered intervention. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, National High School Center. Retrieved from http://www.betterhighschools.org/pubs/#Access.
28.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
29.
EhrlichS.BuckleyK.MidouhasE.BrodeskyA. (2008). Performance patterns for students with disabilities in grade 4 mathematics education in Massachusetts (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2008–No. 051). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
EnglertC. S.TarrantK. L.MariageT. V. (1992). Defining and redefining instructional practice in special education: Perspectives on good teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 62–86.
32.
FedenP. D.ClabaughG. K. (1986). The “new breed” educator: A rationale and program for combining elementary and special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 180–189.
33.
FengL.SassT. R., (2009). Special education teacher quality and student achievement. Unpublished manuscript.
34.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.
35.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4.
36.
GartnerA.LipskyD. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367–395.
37.
GeigerW. L.CrutchfieldM. D.MainzerR. (2003). The status of licensure of special education teachers in the 21st century (COPSSE Document No. RS-7E). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
38.
GerstenR.DiminoJ. A. (2006). RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99–108.
39.
GoeL. (2006). The teacher preparation → teacher practices → student outcomes relationship in special education: Missing links and next steps. A research synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
40.
GoldhaberD. (2002, March). The mystery of good teaching. Education Next. Retrieved from http://www.educationnext.org.
41.
GoodT.GrouwsD. (1979). The Missouri mathematical effectiveness project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 355–362.
42.
HaagerD.GerstenR.BakerS.GravesA. (2003). The English language learner observation instrument for beginning readers. In VaughnS.BriggsK. L. (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 111–144). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
43.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD, and EMR reconsidered. The Journal of Special Education, 11, 139–149.
44.
HammillD. D.LarsenS. C. (1978). The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training: A reaffirmation of position. Exceptional Children, 44, 402–414.
45.
HaringN. G.FargoG. A. (1969). Evaluating programs for preparing teachers of emotionally disturbed children. Exceptional Children, 36, 157–162.
46.
HillH. C.BlunkM. L.CharalambosC. Y.LewisJ. M.PhelpsG. C.SleepL.BallD. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 1–81.
47.
HobbsN. (1975). Issues in the classification of children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2008).
KahnC.MellardD. (2008). RTI in secondary schools: One high school English department's journey. [Brochure]Lawrence, KS: National Center on Response to Intervention.
51.
KauffmanJ. M. (1993). How we might achieve the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60, 6–16.
52.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (2000). History, rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279–296.
53.
KearneyC. A.DurandV. M. (1992). How prepared are our teachers for mainstreamed classroom settings? A survey of postsecondary schools of education in New York State. Exceptional Children, 58, 8–11.
54.
Kleinhammer-TramillJ. (2003). An analysis of federal initiatives to prepare regular educators to serve students with disabilities: Deans' grants, REGI, and beyond. Teacher Education and Special Education26, 230–245.
55.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.HughesM. T.SchummJ. S.ElbaumB. (1998). Outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 153–161.
LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (Eds.) (1997). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America's classrooms. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
58.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
MackieR. P.DunnL. M. (1954). College and university programs for the preparation of teachers of exceptional children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
60.
MacMillanD. L.ReschlyD. J. (1998). Overrepresentation of minority students: The case for greater specificity or reconsideration of the variables examined. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 15–24.
61.
MarstonD. (1987). Does categorical teacher certification benefit the mildly handicapped child?Exceptional Children, 53, 423–431.
62.
MarstonD.MuyskensP.LauM.CanterA. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187–200.
63.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 525–531.
64.
McIntoshR.VaughnS.SchummJ. S.HaagerD.LeeO. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms: You don't bother me and I won't bother you. Exceptional Children, 60, 249–261.
65.
National Mathematics Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
66.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
67.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
68.
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 E.D. Pa. (1972).
69.
PugachM. (1987). The national education reports and special education: Implications for teacher preparation. Exceptional Children, 53, 308–314.
70.
ReynoldsM. (1979). Categorical vs. noncategorical teacher training. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 5–11.
71.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
72.
RosenbergM. S.SindelarP. T.HardmanM. (2004). Preparing highly qualified teachers for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: The impact of NCLB and IDEA. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 266–278.
73.
SamuelsC. A. (2009). High schools try out RTI. Education Week, 28 (19), 20–22.
SemmelM. I.SemmelD.MorriseyP. A. (1976). Competency-based teacher education in special education: A review of research and training programs. Washington, DC: Bureau of Education for the Handicapped.
76.
SeoS.BrownellM. T.BishopA. G.DingleM. (2008). Beginning special education teachers' classroom reading instruction: Practices that engage elementary students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 97–122.
ShinnM. (2008). Implementation in secondary schools. In FernleyS.LaRueS. D.NorlinJ. (Eds.), What do I do when … The answer book on RTI (pp. 8:1–8:17). Arlington, VA: LRP.
79.
SindelarP. T.DenoS. L. (1978). The effectiveness of resource programming. The Journal of Special Education, 12, 17–28.
80.
SnellM. E. (1991). Schools are for all kids: The importance of integration for students with severe disabilities and their peers. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C.SinghN. N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 133–138). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
81.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1991). Rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In LloydJ. W.ReppA. C.SinghN. N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 226–239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
82.
StallingsJ. A. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9, 11–16.
83.
TulbertB.SindelarP. T.CorreaV. I.La PorteM. M. (1996). Looking in the rear view mirror: A content analysis of teacher education and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 248–261.
84.
VaughnS.FuchsL. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.
85.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). (NCSER 2006–3000). Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
86.
WayneA. J.YoungP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89–122.
87.
WebbR. (1994). After the deluge: Changing roles and responsibilities in the primary school. London, England: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.
88.
WillM. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
89.
YsseldykeJ. E. (1973). Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching: The search for aptitude-treatment interactions. The First Review of Special Education, 1, 103–152.
90.
ZigmondN.BakerJ. (1990). Mainstream experiences for learning disabled students (Project Meld) preliminary report. Exceptional Children, 57, 176–185.
