Does Compare-Contrast Text Structure Help Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder Comprehend Science Text?

Abstract

Using a single-subject reversal design, this study evaluated the use of a compare-contrast strategy on the ability of students with autism spectrum disorder to comprehend science text. Three middle school students with high-functioning autism and their teacher participated in this study. A content analysis comparing the number of meaning units in passages to the number of meaning units in student-completed Venn diagrams was conducted for both the treatment and maintenance phases. Results indicated that instruction in the compare-contrast text pattern was effective in increasing participants' comprehension. A content analysis of Venn diagrams revealed a decrease in number of recorded meaning units during the maintenance phase while passage comprehension remained high. Future research and implications for classroom interventions are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asberg

Kopp

Berg-Kelly

Gillberg

(2010). Reading comprehension, word decoding and spelling in girls with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD): Performance and predictors. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45(1), 61–71. doi:10.3109/13682820902745438.

Bernhardt

Destino

Kamil

Rodriguez-Muñoz

(1995). Assessing science knowledge in an English-Spanish bilingual elementary school. Cognosos, 4, 4–6.

Broun

L. T.

(2004). Teaching students with autistic spectrum disorders to read. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 36(4), 36–40. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/content/navigationmenu/publications2/teachingexceptionalchildren/.

Carnahan

Williamson

(2010). Autism, cognition, and reading. In Carnahan

Williamson

(Eds.), Quality literacy instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders (pp. 21–44). Shawn Mission, KS: Autism Asperger.

Carnahan

Williamson

Christman

(2011). Linking cognition and literacy for students with ASD. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(6), 54–62. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/content/navigationmenu/publications2/teachingexceptionalchildren/.

Carrow-Woolfolk

(1995). Oral and written language scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessment.

Catts

H. W.

(2009). The narrow view of reading promotes a broad view of comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(2), 178–183. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0035)

Chiang

H. M.

Lin

Y. H.

(2007). Reading comprehension instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 259–267. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040801.

Duke

N. K.

(2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in the first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224. doi:10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1.

10.

Duke

N. K.

Purcell-Gates

(2003). Genres at home and at school: Bridging the known to the new. The Reading Teacher, 57, 30–37. doi:10.1598/RT.57.1.4.

11.

Frith

(2006). Common behaviors. Scientific American Mind, 17(5), 72–75. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/sciammind/.

12.

Gajria

Jitendra

A. K.

Sood

Sacks

(2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210–225. doi:10.1177/00222194070400030301.

13.

Gast

Hammond

(2010). Withdrawal and reversal designs. In Gast

(Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 234–276). New York, NY: Routledge.

14.

Gast

Spriggs

(2010). Visual analysis of graphic data. In Gast

(Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 199–233). New York, NY: Routledge.

15.

Gately

(2008). Facilitating reading comprehension for students on the autism spectrum. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(3), 40–45. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/content/navigationmenu/publications2/teachingexceptionalchildren/.

16.

Goldman

S. R.

Rakestraw

J. A.

Jr. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In Kamil

M. S.

Mosenthal

P. B.

Pearson

P. D.

Barr

(Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 311–335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

17.

Hatch

J. A.

(2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: SUNY.

18.

Jitendra

A. K.

Burgess

Gajria

(2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77, 135–159.

19.

Kamps

D. M.

Barbetta

P. M.

Leonard

B. R.

Delquadri

(1994). Classwide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49–61. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-49.

20.

Kamps

D. M.

Leonard

Potucek

Garrison-Harrell

(1995). Cooperative learning groups in reading: An integration strategy for students with autism and general classroom peers. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 89–109.

21.

Kennedy

(2004). Single case design for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

22.

Lane

K. L.

Beebe-Frankenberger

M. E.

(2004). School-based interventions: The tools you need to succeed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

23.

Leslie

Caldwell

(2010). Qualitative reading inventory: 5. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

24.

Meyer

B. J. F.

Poon

L. W.

(2001). Effects of structure training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 141–159. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.141.

25.

Nation

Clarke

Wright

Williams

(2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(7), 911–919. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0130-1.

26.

Randi

Newman

Grigorenko

(2010). Teaching children with autism to read for meaning: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 890–902. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0938-6.

27.

Saldana

Frith

(2007). Do readers with autism make bridging inferences from world knowledge? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.11.002.

28.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(1998). Summarizing single subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242. doi:10.1177/01454455980223001.

29.

Semel

E. M.

Wiig

E. H.

Secord

(2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (CELF-4). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

30.

Shanahan

Callison

Carriere

Duke

N. K.

Pearson

P. D.

Schatschneider

Torgesen

(2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through third grade: A practice guide (NCEE #2010–4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

31.

Smith-Myles

Hilgenfeld

T. D.

Barnhill

Griswold

Hagiwara

Simpson

(2002). Analysis of reading skills in individuals with Asperger syndrome. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(1), 44–47. doi:10.1177/108835760201700104.

32.

Snyder

(2010). Reading expository material: Are we asking the right questions? Topics in Language Disorders, 30(1), 39–47. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181d098b3.

33.

Stein

N. L.

Trabasso

(1981). What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In Glaser

(Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 213–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

34.

Wahlberg

Magliano

(2004). The ability of high functioning individuals with autism to understand written discourse. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 119–144. Retrieved from http://www.societyfortextanddiscourse.org/dp/index.html.

35.

Whalon

K. J.

Al Otaiba

Delano

M. E.

(2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24(1), 3–16. doi:10.1177/1088357608328515.

36.

Whalon

K. J.

Hart

J. E.

(2011). Children with autism spectrum disorder and literacy instruction: An exploratory study of elementary inclusive settings. Remedial and Special Education, 32(3), 243–255. doi:10.1177/0741932510362174.

37.

Williams

J. P.

Hall

K. M.

Lauer

K. D.

(2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3), 129–144. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1203_2.

38.

Williams

J. P.

Hall

K. M.

Lauer

K. D.

Stafford

DeSisto

deCani

(2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Education Psychology, 97(4), 538–550. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.538.

39.

Williams

J. P.

Nubla-Kung

A. M.

Pollini

Stafford

K. B.

Garcia

Snyder

A. E.

(2007). Teaching cause-effect text structure through social studies content to at-risk second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(2), 111–120. doi:10.1177/00222194070400020201.

40.

Williams

J. P.

Stafford

K. B.

Lauer

K. D.

Hall

K. M.

Pollini

(2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 1–20. doi:10.1037/a0013152.

41.

Williamson

Carnahan

Jacobs

(2012). Reading comprehension profiles of high-functioning students on the autism spectrum: A grounded theory. Exceptional Children, 78, 449–469.

42.

Zwiers

(2010). Building reading comprehension habits in grades 6–12: A toolkit of classroom activities. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.