This study investigates how state departments of education are defining response to intervention (RTI) assessment processes as they relate to specific learning disability (SLD) eligibility 5 years after the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 2006 regulations were published. A qualitative research design of directed content analysis was used to examine each state's regulatory criteria for SLD and state guidance documents on the use of RTI for SLD identification. Best practices were identified in three areas: (a) frequency of data collection, (b) criteria for responsiveness, and (c) multidimensional assessment. Results showed no national consensus for how multidisciplinary teams should use RTI data as part of SLD identification. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed.
Florida Department of Education. (2011). Guiding tools for instructional problem solving. Retrieved from http://www.florida-rti.org.
9.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.McMasterK.Al OtaibaS. (2003). Identifying children at risk for reading failure: Curriculum-based measurement and the dual discrepancy approach. In SwansonL.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of Learning Disabilities (pp. 235–246). New York, NY: Guilford.
HaleJ. B.KaufmanA.NaglieriJ. A.KavaleK. A. (2006). Implementation of idea: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 753–770. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1002/pits.20186.
12.
Heartland AEA 11. (2000). Program manual for special education. Johnston, IA: Author.
13.
HospJ. (2006). Implementing RTI assessment practices and response to intervention. NASP Communiqué, 34(7).
HuangL. V.BardosA. N.D'AmatoR. C. (2010). Identifying students with learning disabilities: Composite profile analysis using the cognitive assessment system. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 19–30. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0734282909333057.
Individuals With Disabilities Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. ¶ 4301 et seq. (2006).
19.
JohnsonE. S.HumphreyM.MellardD. F.WoodsK.SwansonH. L. (2010). Cognitive processing deficits and students with specific learning disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 3–18.
Mississippi Department of Education. (2009). State policies regarding children with disabilities under the individuals with disabilities education act amendments of 2004. Jackson, MS: Author.
23.
National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). RTI state database. Retrieved from http://state.rti4success.org/.
Policies and Procedures for the Provision of Special Education Services for Students With Disabilities and Gifted Students, New Mexico Public Education Department Special Education Division, Primary and Secondary Education: Special Education, Children With Disabilities/Gifted Children [Title 6, Chapter 31, Part 2]. (2010). Retrieved from: http://ped.state.nm.us/SEB/2012/6_31_2_final_rule_2_29_12.pdf.
30.
ReschlyD. J.TillyW. D.GrimesJ. P. (1999). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
ShinnM. R. (2007). Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within response to intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 601–617.
33.
State of Connecticut Regulations: State Department of Education, Conn. Stat. Sec. 18. Section 10–76d-9. (2005).
WatsonS. M. R.GableR. A.GreenwoodC. R. (2011). Combining ecobehavioral assessment, functional assessment, and response to intervention to promote more effective classroom instruction. Remedial and Special Education 32, 334–344. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0741932510362219.
