The relationship between basic oral language and early numeracy has been studied extensively, but results hardly include kindergartners’ math language, which might mediate this relationship. The aim of this study was to investigate the development of basic language skills—specifically, math language and low early numeracy. Dutch children (4–5 years old; N = 1,030) were screened for having low early numeracy skills, and low performers (n = 199) were followed for 2 years and tested four times throughout kindergarten. The development of general language skills and early numeracy were investigated with latent growth modeling, revealing a significant mutual relationship. Further, the relationship between basic language and early numeracy was mediated by kindergartners’ specific math language, suggesting that specific math language has a key role in the early numeracy learning process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. R. (1972). Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 42, 359–385. doi:10.2307/1169995
2.
AllowayT. P.GathercoleS. E.AdamsA.WillisC.EaglenR.LamontE. (2005). Working memory and phonological awareness as predictors of progress towards early learning goals at school entry. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 417–426. doi:10.1348/026151005X26804
3.
AndersonA.AndersonJ.ShapiroJ. (2004). Mathematical discourse in shared storybook reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 5–33. doi:10.2307/30034801
4.
AunioP.HautamäkiJ.SajaniemiN.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2009). Early numeracy in low-performing young children. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 25–46. doi:10.1080/01411920802041822
5.
BaldoJ. V.DronkersN. F. (2007). Neural correlates of arithmetic and language comprehension: A common substrate?Neuropsychologia, 45, 229–235. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.014
6.
BergD. H. (2008). Working memory and arithmetic calculation in children: The contributory role of processing speed, short-term memory, and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 288–308. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.12.002
7.
BlunchN. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS & AMOS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01143_6.x
8.
BoonenA. J. H.KolkmanM. E.KroesbergenE. H. (2011). The relation between teachers’ math talk and the acquisition of number sense within kindergarten classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 281–299. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.002
9.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.RobertsG.VaughnS.PfannenstielK. H.PorterfieldJ.GerstenR. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23.
10.
ButterworthB.VarmaS.LaurillardD. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332, 1049–1053. doi:10.1126/science.1201536
11.
ByrneB. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, & programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
DehaeneS.PiazzaM.PinelP.CohenL. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506. doi:10.1080/02643290244000239
14.
Department for Education and Employment (2000). The national numeracy strategy: Mathematical vocabulary. London, England: Author.
15.
DesoeteA.CeulemansA.De WeerdtF.PietersS. (2012). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 64–81. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002002
16.
DesoeteA.RoeyersH.De ClercqA. (2004). Children with mathematics learning disabilities in belgium. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 50–61. doi:10.1177/00222194040370010601
17.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP., . . . JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
18.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2012). The early prevention of mathematics difficulty: Its power and limitations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 257–269. doi:10.1177/0022219412442167
19.
FuchsL. S.GearyD. C.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.BryantJ. D. (2010). The contributions of numerosity and domain-general abilities to school readiness. Child Development, 81, 1520–1533. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01489.x
20.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning & Individual Differences, 20, 89–100. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.003
21.
GelderblomG. (2007). Effectief omgaan met verschillen in het rekenonderwijs [Dealing effective with individual differences in math education]. Amersfoort, Netherlands: CPS.
22.
GelmanR.ButterworthB. (2005). Number and language: How are they related?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 6–10. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.004
23.
GerstenR.ClarkeB.JordanN. C.Newman-GoncharR.HaymondK.WilkinsC. (2012). Universal screening in mathematics for the primary grades: Beginnings of a research base. Exceptional Children, 78, 423–445.
24.
GerstenR.JordanN. C.FlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304. doi:10.1177/00222194050380040301
HalberdaJ.TaingL.LidzJ. (2008). The development of “most” comprehension and its potential dependence on counting ability in preschoolers. Language Learning & Development, 4, 99–121. doi:10.1080/15475440801922099
27.
HooperS. R.RobertsJ.SiderisJ.BurchinalM.ZeiselS. (2010). Longitudinal predictors of reading and math trajectories through middle school for African American versus Caucasian students across two samples. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1018–1029. doi:10.1037/a0018877.
28.
JeonH.PetersonC. A.WallS.CartaJ. J.LuzeG.EshbaughE. M.SwansonM. (2011). Predicting school readiness for low-income children with disability risks identified early. Exceptional Children, 77, 435–452.
29.
JordanN. C.GluttingJ.DysonN.Hassinger-DasB.IrwinC. (2012). Building kindergartners’ number sense: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 647–660. doi:10.1037/a0029018
30.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.Nabors OláhL.LocuniakM. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00862.x
31.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867. doi:10.1037/a0014939
32.
KleemansT.SegersE.VerhoevenL. (2011). Cognitive and linguistic precursors to numeracy in kindergarten: Evidence from first and second language learners. Learning & Individual Differences, 21, 555–561. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.008
33.
KlibanoffR. S.LevineS. C.HuttenlocherJ.VasilyevaM.HedgesL. V. (2006). Preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher “math talk.”Developmental Psychology, 42, 59–68. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.59
34.
KrajewskiK.SchneiderW. (2009). Early development of quantity to number-word linkage as a precursor of mathematical school achievement and mathematical difficulties: Findings from a four-year longitudinal study. Learning & Instruction, 19, 513–526. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.10.002
35.
KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H.Van LieshoutE. C. D. M.Van LoosbroekE.Van de RijtB. A. M. (2009). Individual differences in early numeracy: The role of executive functions and subitizing. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 226–236. doi:10.1177/0734282908330586
36.
LansdellJ. M. (1999). Introducing young children to mathematical concepts: Problems with “new” terminology. Educational Studies, 25, 327–333. doi:10.1080/03055699997837
37.
LansinkN. (2009). Handleiding taal voor kleuters [Manual language for kindergartners]. Arnhem, Netherlands: Cito.
38.
LansinkN.HemkerB. (2012). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording van de toetsen taal voor kleuters voor groep 1 en 2 uit het cito volgsysteem primair onderwijs [Scientific justification of language for kindergartners]. Arnhem, Netherlands: Cito.
39.
LocuniakM. N.JordanN. C. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 451–459. doi:10.1177/0022219408321126
40.
MacCallumR. C. (1990). The need for alternative measures of fit in covariance structure modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 157–162. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_2
41.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
MazzoccoM. M. M. (2005). Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 318–323.
43.
MazzoccoM. M. M.ThompsonR. E. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 142–155. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00129.x
44.
MoellerK.PixnerS.ZuberJ.KaufmannL.NuerkH.-C. (2011). Early place-value understanding as a precursor for later arithmetic performance: A longitudinal study on numerical development. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1837–1851. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.012
45.
MurphyM. M.MazzoccoM. M.HanichL. B.EarlyM. C. (2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 458–478.
46.
MuthénB. O.KhooS. T. (1998). Longitudinal studies of achievement growth using latent variable modeling. Learning & Individual Differences, 10, 73–102. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80135-6
47.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
48.
PassolunghiM. C.LanfranchiS. (2012). Domain-specific and domain-general precursors of mathematical achievement: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to first grade. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 42–63. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02039.x
49.
PrudenS. M.LevineS. C.HuttenlocherJ. (2011). Children’s spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter?Developmental Science, 14, 1417–1430. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x
50.
PurpuraD. J.HumeL. E.SimsD. M.LoniganC. J. (2011). Early literacy and early numeracy: The value of including early literacy skills in the prediction of numeracy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 647–658. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.004
51.
RomanoE.BabchishinL.PaganiL. S.KohenD. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: Replication and extension using a nationwide Canadian survey. Developmental Psychology, 46, 995. doi:10.1037/a0018880
52.
SarneckaB. W.GelmanS. A. (2004). Six does not just mean a lot: Preschoolers see number words as specific. Cognition, 92, 329–252. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2003.10.001
53.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2010). Language in mathematics teaching and learning. In MoschkovichJ. N. (Ed.), Language & mathematics education: Multiple perspectives & directions for research (pp. 73–112). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
54.
SchmittelD. K.BassL. A. (2012). Relations between oral language, literacy, & mathematics skill in middle-income first-grade children. Poster presented at the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI.
55.
SeethalerP. M.FuchsL. S. (2010). The predictive utility of kindergarten screening for math difficulty. Exceptional Children, 77, 37–59.
56.
SieglerR. S. (2009). Improving the numerical understanding of children from low-income families. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 118–124. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00090.x
57.
SimmonsF. R.SingletonC. (2008). Do weak phonological representations impact arithmetic development? A review of arithmetic and dyslexia. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research & Practice, 14, 77–94. doi:10.1002/dys.341
58.
SpelkeE. S.TsivkinS. (2001) Language and number: A bilingual training study. Cognition, 78, 45–88. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00108-6
59.
StockP.DesoeteA.RoeyersH. (2010). Detecting children with arithmetic disabilities from kindergarten: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study on the role of preparatory arithmetic abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 250–268. doi:10.1177/0022219409345011
60.
StorchS. A.WhitehurstG. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947. doi:10.1037// 0012-1649.38.6.934
61.
SwansonH. L. (2011). Working memory, attention, and mathematical problem solving: A longitudinal study of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 821–837. doi:10.1037/a0025114
62.
TollS. W. M.Van der VenS. H. G.KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2011). Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 521–532. doi:10.1177/0022219410387302
63.
TollS. W. M.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2012). Early numeracy intervention for low-performing kindergartners. Journal of Early Intervention, 34, 243–264. doi:10.1177\10053815113477205.
64.
TymmsP.MerrellC.HendersonB. (1997). The first year at school: A quantitative investigation of the attainment and progress of pupils. Educational Research & Evaluation, 3, 101–118. doi:10.1080/1380361970030201
65.
Van LuitJ. E. H.Van de RijtB. A. M. (2009). Utrechtse getalbegrip toets–revised [Early numeracy test–revised]. Doetinchem, Netherlands: Graviant.
66.
VerhoevenL.VermeerA. (1993). Handleiding taaltoets alle kinderen [Manual language test for all children]. Arnhem, Netherlands: Cito.
67.
VerhoevenL.VermeerA. (2006). Verantwoording taaltoets alle kinderen [Justification language test for all children]. Arnhem, Netherlands: Cito.
68.
WhitehurstG. J.LoniganC. J. (1998). Child development and early literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.
69.
WothkeW. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In LittleT. D. (Ed.), Modeling longitudinal & multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approached, & specific examples (pp. 219-240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
Young-LoveridgeJ. M. (2004). Effects on early numeracy of a program using number books and games. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 82–94. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.001
