The purpose of the present review was to evaluate the quality of the research and evidence base for representation of problems as a strategy to enhance the mathematical performance of students with learning disabilities and those at risk for mathematics difficulties. The authors evaluated 25 experimental and quasiexperimental studies according to the Gersten et al. (2005) guidelines for group research studies. Results suggest that the representation of mathematical problems as a strategy is an evidence-based practice based on the criteria set by Gersten et al. Implications for research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerS.ChardD. J.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.ApichatabutraC.DoablerC. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75, 303–318.
2.
BoothJ. L.KoedingerK. R. (2012). Are diagrams always helpful tools? Developmental and individual differences in the effect of presentation format on student problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 492–511. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02041.x
3.
BriganceA. H. (1999). Brigance Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills–Revised. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
4.
*ButlerF. M.MillerS. P.CrehanK.BabbittB.PierceT. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 99–111. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00066
5.
CirinoP. TEwing-CobbsL.BarnesM.FuchsL. S.FletcherJ. M. (2007). Cognitive arithmetic differences in learning disability groups and the role of behavioral inattention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 25–35. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00228.x
6.
ConnollyA. J. (1998). KeyMath–Revised, normative update: A diagnostic inventory of essential mathematics. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
CuocoA. A.CurcioF. R. (2001). 2001 Yearbook: The roles of representation in school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9.
DammannJ. E.VaughnS. (2001). Science and sanity in special education. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 21–29.
10.
DeLeeuwK. E.MayerR. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 223–234. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.223
11.
*FedeJ. L.PierceM. E.MatthewsW. J. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted, schema-based instruction intervention on word problem-solving skills of low-performing fifth grade students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28, 9–21.
12.
*FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
13.
FuchsL. S.GearyD. C.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M.. . . SchatschneiderC. (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities?Developmental Psychology, 46, 1731–1746. doi:10.1037/a0020662
14.
*FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.. . . ZumetaR. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 561–576.
*FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.SterbaS. K.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA.. . . ChangasP. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude–treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 499–514. doi:10.1037/a0034341
17.
*FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–174. doi:10.1177/001440290807400202
18.
GearyD. CHoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.NugentL.NumteeC. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematics learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x
19.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.BaileyD. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 206–223. doi:10.1037/a0025398
20.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Services, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
21.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
22.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
23.
GoldinG. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In KilpatrickJ.Gary MartinW.SchifterD. (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 275–285). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24.
GoldinG. A.KaputJ. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In SteffeL.NesherP.CobbP.GoldinG.GreerB. (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397–430). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
HegartyM.KozhevnikovM. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689.
26.
HooverH. D.HieronymousA. N.DunbarS. B.FrisbieD. A. (1993). Iowa Test of Basic Skills, Form K. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
27.
*HutchinsonN. L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34–63.
28.
*IvesB. (2007). Graphic organizers applied to secondary algebra instruction for students with learning disorders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 110–118. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00235.x
29.
JitendraA. K.BurgessC.GajriaM. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77, 135–159. doi:10.1177/001440291107700201
30.
*JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.RodriguezM. C.ZaslofskyA. F.SlaterS.Cozine-CorroyK.ChurchC. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of the impact of schema-based instruction on mathematical outcomes for third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Elementary School Journal, 114, 252–276. doi:10.1086/673199
31.
*JitendraA. K.GriffinC. C.McGoeyK.GardillM. C.BhatP.RileyT. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345–355. doi:10.1080/00220679809597564
32.
JitendraA. K.Peterson-BrownS.LeinA.ZaslofskyA.KunkelA.JungP-G.EganA. (2015). Teaching mathematical word problem solving: The quality of evidence for strategy instruction priming the problem structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 51–72. doi:10.1177/0022219413487408
33.
JordanN. G.HanichL. B.KaplanD. (2003). Arithmetic fact mastery in young children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 103–119. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00032-8
34.
*KellyB.GerstenR.CarnineD. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23–29. doi:10.1177/002221949002300108
35.
LeshR.PostT.BehrM. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In JanvierC. (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
*ManaloE.BunnellJ. K.StillmanJ. A. (2000). The use of process mnemonics in teaching students with mathematics learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 137–156. doi:10.2307/15111142
37.
MartinT.SchwartzD. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 587–625.
38.
MazzoccoM. M.MyersG. F.LewisK. E.HanichL. B.MurphyM. M. (2013). Limited knowledge of fraction representations differentiates middle school students with mathematics learning disability (dyscalculia) versus low mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 371–387. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.005
39.
McGraw-Hill. (2002). CTB Terra Nova. Monterrey, CA: CTB McGraw-Hill.
40.
MisquittaR. (2011). A review of the literature: Fraction instruction for struggling learners in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 109–119. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00330.x
41.
MurphyM. M.MazzoccoM. M. M.HanichL. B.EarlyM. C. (2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 458–478. doi:10.1177/00222194070400050901
42.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
43.
National Governor’s Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
44.
NgS. F.LeeK. (2009). The model method: Singapore children’s tool for representing and solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 282–313.
45.
*OwenR. L.FuchsL. S. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving strategy instruction for third-grade students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 268–278. doi:10.1177/07419325020230050201
46.
*PetersonS. K.MercerC. D.O’SheaL. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students place value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 52–56.
47.
*PowellS. R.FuchsL. S. (2010). Contribution of equal-sign instruction beyond word-problem tutoring for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 381–394. doi:10.1037/a0018447
48.
*TournakiN.BaeY. S.KerekesJ. (2008). Rekenrek: A manipulative used to teach addition and subtraction to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6, 41–59.
49.
van GarderenD. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 496–506.
50.
van GarderenD. (2007). Teaching students with learning disabilities to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 540–553.
51.
van GarderenD.MontagueM. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 246–254. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00079
52.
*Van LuitJ. H.SchopmanE. A. (2000). Improving early numeracy of young children with special education needs. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 27–40.
53.
*WalkerD. W.PoteetJ. A. (1989–1990). A comparison of two methods of teaching mathematics story problem-solving with learning disabled students. National Forum of Special Education Journal, 1, 44–51.
54.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in Grades 4 through 8. Educator’s practice guide (NCEE 2012-4055). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/mps_pg_052212.pdf
55.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: Author.
56.
*WilsonC. L.SindelarP. T. (1991). Direct instruction in math word problems: Students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57, 512–519.
57.
*WitzelB. S.MercerC. D.MillerM. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 121–131. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00068
58.
*WoodwardJ. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 269–289. doi:10.2307/30035554
59.
*WoodwardJ.BrownC. (2006). Meeting the curricular needs of academically low-achieving students in middle grade mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 151–159.
60.
XinY. P.JitendraA. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 207–225.
61.
*XinY. P.JitendraA.Deatline-BuchmanA. (2005). The effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 181–192. doi:10.1177/00224669050390030501
62.
*XinY. P.ZhangD.ParkJ. Y.TomK.WhippleA.SiL. (2011). A comparison of two mathematics problem-solving strategies: Facilitate algebra-readiness. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 381–395. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.487080
63.
ZahnerD.CorterJ. E. (2010). The process of probability problem solving: Use of external visual representations. Mathematical Thinking And Learning: An International Journal, 12, 177–204.
64.
ZhangD.XinY.P. (2012). A follow-up meta-analysis for word-problem-solving interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Educational Research, 105, 303–318. doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.6273
65.
ZhengX.FlynnL. J.SwansonH. L. (2013). Experimental intervention studies on word problem solving and math disabilities: A selective analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 97–111.
66.
ZhengX.SwansonH. L.MarcoulidesG. A. (2011). Working memory components as predictors of children’s mathematical word problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 481–498. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.001
