Structuring cooperative learning activities has been shown to be an effective technique for integrating handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Previous research in this area has focused on the relative effects of cooperative versus competitive and individualistic learning situations upon peer relations and academic achievement. Few investigations have examined the various elements within the cooperative learning model that appear to promote positive peer interactions among handicapped and nonhandicapped students. The present study evaluated the influence of collaborative skill instruction versus no collaborative skill instruction on the social interaction behaviors of moderately/severely handicapped and nonhandicapped students participating in group science activities. These data reveal that students receiving collaborative skill instruction interacted more positively with one another than those who did not receive, the instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallardM.CormanL.GottliebJ., & KaufmanJ. (1977). Improving the social status of mainstreamed retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 605–611.
2.
BaumgartD.BrownL.PumpianI.NisbetJ.FordA.SweetM.RanicriL.HansenL., & SchroederJ. (1980). The principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin and Madison Metropolitan School District.
3.
BrickerD. D. (1978). A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped school children. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press.
4.
DeutschM. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.
5.
Elementary Science Study (1971). Sink or float. NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
6.
FredericksH. D.BaldwinV.GroveD.MooreW.RiggsC., & LyonsB. (1978). Integrating the moderately and severely handicapped preschool child into a normal day care setting. In GuralnickM. (Ed.), Early intervention and integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press.
7.
GottliebJ. (1978). Observing social adaptation in schools. In SackettG. P. (Ed.), Observing behavior (Vol. 2). Baltimore: University Park Press.
8.
GreshamF. M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review. Review of educational research, 51(1), 139–176.
9.
JohnsonD., & JohnsonR. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1984). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
11.
JohnsonR., & JohnsonD. (1980). The social integration of handicapped students into the mainstream. In ReynoldsM. C. (Ed.), Social environment of the schools. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
12.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.HolubecE. J., & RoyP. (1984). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T., & MaruyamaG. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 5–54.
14.
MaddenN. A., & SlavinR. E. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 519–569.
15.
MichaelsJ. W. (1977). Classroom reward structures and academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 47, 87–98.
16.
PepitoneE. A. (Ed.) (1980). Children in cooperation and competition. MA: Lexington Books.
17.
PutnamJ. (1983). Social integration through cooperative goal structuring: Effects of teacher instruction on cooperation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
18.
RyndersJ. E.JohnsonR.JohnsonD. W., & SchmidtB. (1980). Producing positive interaction among Down syndrome and nonhandicapped teenagers through cooperative goal structuring. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85(3), 268–273.
19.
SailorW. & MixB.J. (1975). The TARC assessment system. Kansas: H & H Enterprises, Inc.
20.
SlavinR. E., (1977). Classroom reward structure: An analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47(4), 633–650.
21.
SlavinR. E. (1984). Review of cooperative learning research. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.
22.
SlavinR. E. (1985). Personal communication.
23.
SlavinR. E.LeavyM., & MaddenN. (1982). Effects of student teams and individualized instruction on student mathematics achievement, attitudes and behaviors. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1982.
24.
StrainP. S. & ShoresR. E. (1983). Reply to ‘Misguided Mainstreaming.’Exceptional Children, 50(3), 271–273.
25.
VoeltzL. M. (1983). Personal communication.
26.
VoeltzL. M.KishiG., & BrennanJ. (1981). The social interaction observation system (SIOS). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
