It is imperative that special education enable children with disabilities to achieve at high levels. Problems of equity and pedagogical validity have hindered our efforts thus far, and many children of minority cultures are far overrepresented in classrooms for students with learning disabilities and mild mental retardation. Studies have shown the importance of culturally and linguistically inclusive programs and of heterogenous groupings, as well as more effective diagnostic, remedial, and assessment practices. This article discusses a model and basic principles for such techniques to ensure that the educational outcomes of all children are improved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChaseA. (1977). The legacy of Malthus: The social cost of scientific racism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
2.
CohenR. (1969). Conceptual styles, culture conflict, and non-verbal tests of intelligence. American Anthropologist, 71(5), 328–857.
3.
CohenR. (1971). The influence of conceptual rule sets on measures of learning ability. In TuminM. (Ed.), Race and Intelligence. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
4.
ColeM.GayJ.GlickJ., & SharpD. W. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking: An exploration in experimental anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
5.
DeparleJ. (1990, November 30) An architect of the Reagan vision plunges into inquiry on race and I.Q. New York Times, p. A1.
6.
FeuersteinR. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device. Baltimore: University Park Press.
7.
FeuersteinR. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore: University Park Press.
8.
GlassG. V. (1983). Effectiveness of special education. Policy Studies Review, 2(1), University of Kansas.
9.
GouldS. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.
10.
HellerK. A.HoltzmanW. H., & MessickS. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
HilliardA. G.III. (1976). Alternatives to IQ testing: An approach to the identification of “gifted” minority children. Final report to the California State Department of Education, Special Education Support Unit. New York: Columbia University. (ERIC Clearinghouse on Early Childhood Education, ED 146–009).
12.
HilliardA. G.III. (1979). Standardization and cultural bias as impediments to the scientific study and validation of intelligence. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(2), 49–58.
13.
HilliardA. G.III. (1983). Psychological factors associated with language in the education of the African-American child. Journal of Negro Education, 52(1), 24–34.
14.
HilliardA. G.III. (1984). I.Q. testing as the emperor's new clothes: A critique of bias in mental testing. In ReynoldsC. & BrownR. E. (Eds.), Perspective on bias in mental testing (pp. 139–169). New York: Plenum Press.
15.
HilliardA. G.III. (Ed.). (1987, April-July). Testing African American students [Special Issue]. Negro Education Review, 38(2–3). (Also see reissue, 1992, by Southern Education Foundation, 135 Auburn Ave., 2nd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303.)
16.
KaminL. (1974). The science and politics of IQ. New York: Wiley.
17.
Levi-StraussC. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
LidzC. S. (Ed.). (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.
19.
LipskyD. K., & GartnerA. (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
SkrticT. M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61(2), 148–206.
21.
SmithE. A. (1978). The retention of the phonological, phonemic, and morphophonemic features of Africa in Afro-American ebonics (Seminar Series Paper #40). Fullerton, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University at Fullerton.
22.
SmithE. A. (1979). A diagnostic instrument for assessing the phonological competence and performance of the inner-city Afro-American child (Seminar Series Paper #41). Fullerton, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University at Fullerton.
23.
SmithermanG. (1977). Talkin' and testifyin': The language of Black America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
TenhoutonW. (1971, July). Cognitive styles and the social order. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles. (Distributed by National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22151).
25.
TurnerL. (1949). Africanisms in the Gullah dialect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
