A policy study initiated in 1996 investigated implementation of the transition mandates of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in nine sites across the United States. Five sites were identified as model sites because they had a national reputation for effective implementation of transition policies and practices, while four were identified as representative sites demonstrating progress in the face of challenges typically associated with local level implementation. Visits to each site included in-depth interviews, observations, and document reviews. Following the visits, procedures associated with qualitative inquiry were used to prepare individual summary reports and conduct a cross-case analysis. Results of the cross-case analysis are presented, including factors supporting and posing challenges to implementation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.*
2.
BooneR. (1992). Involving culturally diverse parents in transition planning. Career Development in Exceptional Individuals, 15, 205–221.
3.
DeStefanoL.WermuthT. R. (1992). IDEA (P.L. 101-476): Defining a second generation of transition services. In RuschF. R.DeStefanoL.Chadsey-RuschJ.PhelpsA.SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 537–549). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.*
4.
ElmoreR. F. (1996). Getting to scale with successful practices. In FuhrmanS. H.O'DayJ. A. (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work. (pp. 294–329). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.*
5.
ElmoreR. F.McLaughlinM. W. (1988). Steady work: Policy, practice, and the reform of American education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.*
6.
FieldS. (1996). A historical perspective on student involvement in the transition process: Toward a vision of self-determination for all students. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 19, 169–176.
7.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 113–128.
8.
ForestM.PearpointJ. (1992). Putting kids on the map. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 26–31.
9.
FullanM. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.*
10.
FurneyK. S.HasaziS. B.DeStefanoL. (1997). Transition policies, promises, and practices: Lessons from three states. Exceptional Children, 63, 343–356.
11.
GlazerB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.*
12.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd edition). New York: Longman.*
13.
HarryB. (1992). An ethnographic study of cross-cultural communication with Puerto Rican-American families in the special education system. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 471–494.
14.
HasaziS. B.JohnstonA. P.LiggettA.SchattmanR. (1994). A qualitative study of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Exceptional Children, 60, 491–507.
15.
HubermanM.MilesM. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. (P.L. 105-17). (1997). 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. (Congressional Record 1997).
17.
LincolnY.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.*
18.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H. (1996). Choice Maker: Infusing self-determination into the IEP and transition process. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span (pp. 215–236). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
19.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H.MaxsonL. L. (1993). Transition policy: Infusing self-determination and self-advocacy into transition programs. Career Development of Exceptional Individuals, 16(1), 53–61.
20.
MaxwellJ. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
21.
McDonnellL.ElmoreR. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133–151.
22.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
23.
MoustakasC. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
24.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
25.
RistR. C. (1994). Influencing the policy process with qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 545–558). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
26.
SalembierG.FurneyK. S. (1994). Promoting self-advocacy and family participation in IEP and transition planning. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 17(1), 12–17.
27.
SalembierG. S.FurneyK. S. (1997). Facilitating participation: Parents' perceptions of their involvement in the IEP/transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 20(1), 29–42.
28.
SontagJ. C.SchachtR. (1994). An ethnic comparison of parent participation and information needs in early intervention. Exceptional Children, 60, 422–433.
29.
SpillaneJ. P.ThompsonC. L. (1996). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
StoneD. A. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. Boston: W. W. Norton & Co.*
31.
StowitschekJ. J.KelsoC. A. (1992). Policy planning in transition programs at the state agency level. In RuschF. R.DeStefanoL.Chadsey-RuschJ.PhelpsA.SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 519–536). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.*
32.
SzymanskiE. M. (1994). Transition: Life-span and life-space considerations for empowerment. Exceptional Children, 60, 401–410.
33.
TurnbullA. P.Blue-BanningM. J.AndersonE. L.TurnbullH. R.SeatonK.DinasP. A. (1996). Enhancing self-determination through group action planning. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span (pp. 237–256). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
34.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R. (1996). Self-determination within a culturally responsive family systems perspective: Balancing the family mobile. In PowersL. E.SingerG. H. S.SingerJ. S. (Eds.), In On the road to autonomy: Promoting self-competence in children and youth with disabilities (pp. 195–220). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
35.
WardM. J. (1996). Coming of age in the age of self-determination: A historical and personal perspective. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span (pp. 3–16). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
36.
WehmanP. (1992). Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
37.
WehmeyerM.SchwartzM. A. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
38.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span (pp. 17–36). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
39.
WehmeyerM. L.WardM. J. (1995). Student involvement in transition planning: Fulfilling the intent of IDEA. Journal of Vocational Special Needs Education, 17, 108–111.
