The two Asian giants, China and India, share a long history of political acrimony and simmering border disputes. This often disrupts their bilateral economic relationship along with the overall dynamics of the regional balance of power and the global multi-polarisation order. Under such a scenario, this study aims to measure the impact of a hypothetical removal of all trade barriers between China and India on the overall exports and welfare of 73 sample countries while preserving the geographical trade costs. Employing the structural gravity model under a general equilibrium setting, the counterfactual scenario reveals that India, followed by China, is the main beneficiary of full-scale integration in terms of trade growth and welfare. Indian consumers gain while producers tend to lose through a decrease in prices. Chinese welfare gains are shared among its producers and consumers with light asymmetry. Next, we simulate a unilateral removal of all trade barriers while preserving the effects of geography for exports from China to India. The results reveal that asymmetric trade liberalisation leads to smaller gains for both countries at the expense of certain groups and the aggregate national welfare.
AgarwalM., & GhoshM. (2011). An India–China FTA: Potential economic implications for the Asian and the North American Economies. South Asia Economic Journal, 12(2),185–220.
2.
AhmadI., KunrooM. H., & SofiI. A. (2018). An RCA analysis of India–China trade integration: Present, potential and prospects. Foreign Trade Review, 53(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732516681885
3.
AllenT., ArkolakisC., & TakahashiY. (2020). Universal gravity. Journal of Political Economy, 128(2), 393–433.
4.
AndersonJ. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
5.
AndersonJ. E., LarchM., & YotovY. V. (2018). GEPPML: General equilibrium analysis with PPML. The World Economy, 41(10), 2750–2782.
6.
AndersonJ. E., & WincoopE. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
7.
ArchanaV. (2019). The potential impact of China–India free trade agreement on Chinese and Indian industries. China Economic Journal, 12(3), 297–315.
8.
ArkolakisC., RamondoN., Rodríguez-ClareA., & YeapleS. (2018). Innovation and production in the global economy. American Economic Review, 108(8), 2128–2173.
9.
ArmingtonP. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of origin. IMF Staff Papers, 16, 159–178.
10.
AroraR., SinghS., & MathurS. K. (2015). Assessment of the proposed India–China Free trade agreement: A general equilibrium approach. Journal of Centrum Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 8(2), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCC-08-02-2015-B002
11.
AroraV., & VamvakidisA. (2005). How much do trading partners matter for economic growth?IMF Staff Papers, 52(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035946
12.
BatraA. (2006). India’s global trade potential: The gravity model approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327–361.
13.
BensidounI., LemoineF., & ÜnalD. (2009). The integration of China and India into the world economy: A comparison. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 6(1), 131–155.
14.
BergstrandJ. H., LarchM., & YotovY. V. (2015). Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation. European Economic Review, 78, 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.003
15.
BhatT. P., GuhaA., & PaulM. (2006). India and China in WTO: Building complementarities and competitiveness in the external trade sector. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi.
16.
BhattacharyaS. K., & BhattacharyayB. N. (2007). Gains and losses of India–China trade cooperation: A gravity model impact analysis. CESifo.
17.
BorchertI., LarchM., ShikherS., & YotovY. V. (2021). The international trade and production database for estimation (ITPD-E). International Economics, 166, 140–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2020.08.001
18.
BosworthB., & CollinsS. M. (2008). Accounting for growth: Comparing China and India. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 45–66.
19.
BrodaC., GreenfieldJ., & WeinsteinD. (2006). From groundnuts to globalization: A structural estimate of trade and growth. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
20.
BrunsS. B., & IoannidisJ. P. A. (2020). Determinants of economic growth: Different time different answer?Journal of Macroeconomics, 63, 103185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2019.103185
21.
CaliendoL., & ParroF. (2015). Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1), 1–44.
22.
CostinotA., & Rodríguez-ClareA. (2014). Trade theory with numbers: Quantifying the consequences of globalization. InHandbook of international economics (Vol. 4, pp. 197)–261). Elsevier.
23.
DebS. (2010). Can trade liberalization promote growth in agriculture: Evidence from China and India. 13th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Penang, Malaysia.
FallyT. (2015). Structural gravity and fixed effects. Journal of International Economics, 97(1), 76–85.
29.
FeenstraR. C. (2015). Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press.
30.
FeenstraR. C. (2016). Gains from trade under monopolistic competition. Pacific Economic Review, 21(1), 35–44.
31.
FeilsD. J., & RahmanM. (2011). The impact of regional integration on insider and outsider FDI. Management International Review, 51(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0062-z
32.
FelbermayrG., HeidB., LarchM., & YalcinE. (2015). Macroeconomic potentials of transatlantic free trade: A high resolution perspective for Europe and the world. Economic Policy, 30(83), 491–537.
33.
FrankelJ. A., & RomerD. H. (1999). Does trade cause growth?American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.379
34.
FungK. C., & Garcia-HerreroA. (2012). Foreign direct investment outflows from China and India. China Economic Policy Review, 1(01), 1250003.
35.
GaulierG., LemoineF., & Ünal-KesenciD. (2007). China’s integration in East Asia: Production sharing, FDI & high-tech trade. Economic Change and Restructuring, 40(1), 27–63.
36.
GaurP. (2020). India’s withdrawal from RCEP: Neutralising national trade concerns. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 27, 270–288.
37.
GuhaA. (1993). Economic reform in India and China: What each can learn from the other. Journal of Asian Economics, 4(2), 333–345.
38.
GulatiA., & FanS. (2007). The dragon and the elephant: Agricultural and rural reforms in China and India. International Food Policy Research Institute.
39.
HeadK., & MayerT. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. InHandbook of international economics (Vol. 4, pp. 131)–195). Elsevier.
40.
HeidB. (2015). Regional trade agreements, unemployment, and the informal sector. CESifo Area Conference on Global Economy.
41.
HeidB., & LarchM. (2016). Gravity with unemployment. Journal of International Economics, 101, 70–85.
42.
HerdR., & DoughertyS. (2007). Growth prospects in China and India compared. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(1), 65–89.
43.
HertelT., HummelsD., IvanicM., & KeeneyR. (2007). How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of free trade agreements?Economic Modelling, 24(4), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.12.002
44.
HölscherJ., MarelliE., & SignorelliM. (2010). China and India in the global economy. Economic Systems, 34(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.02.002
45.
HummelsD. (2001). Toward a geography of trade costs (GTAP Working Papers No. 1162). Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
46.
IMF. (2000, January). Globalization: Threat or opportunity? Retrieved November10, 2021 from https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/041200to.htm#footer
47.
IsmailS., & AhmedS. (2020). India–China trade in light and heavy manufacturing sector: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Global Economy Journal, 20(03), 2050014.
48.
KowalskiP. (2008). China and India: A tale of two trade integration approaches (ICRIER Working Paper No. 221). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations
49.
KruegerA. O. (1990). Asian trade and growth lessons. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 108–112.
50.
LedermanD., Francis MaloneyW., MaloneyW. F., & ServenL. (2005). Lessons from NAFTA for Latin America and the Caribbean. Stanford University Press.
51.
LeleU., & GoswamiS. (2020). Agricultural policy reforms: Roles of markets and states in China and India. Global Food Security, 26, 100371.
52.
LemieuxP. (2018). What’s wrong with protectionism: Answering common objections to free trade. Rowman & Littlefield.
53.
LemoineF., & Ünal-KesenciD. (2007). China and India in international trade: From laggards to leaders?. Citeseer.
54.
ManzoorH., & MirP. A. (2022). General equilibrium trade policy analysis among one belt one road nations using structural gravity framework. Foreign Trade Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325221120712
55.
MarelliE., & SignorelliM. (2011). China and India: Openness, trade and effects on economic growth. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 8 (1), 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.02.002
56.
MayerT., & ZignagoS. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distances measures. The GeoDist database.
57.
MukherjeeA., & ZhangX. (2007). Rural industrialization in China and India: Role of policies and institutions. World Development, 35(10), 1621–1634.
58.
NagB., & ChatterjeeR. (2009). Bilateral Trade and Investment between India and china: measuring relative competitiveness in each other’s market. Foreign Trade Review, 44(2), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732515090202
59.
OliveroM. P., & YotovY. V. (2012). Dynamic gravity: Endogenous country size and asset accumulation. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 45(1), 64–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01687.x
60.
PanagariyaA., & SundaramA. (2013). External liberalization by India and China: Recent experience and future challenges. Indian Growth and Development Review, 6(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538251311329531
61.
PardesiM. S. (2021). Explaining the asymmetry in the Sino-Indian strategic rivalry. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(3), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1893267
62.
PrimeP. B., SubrahmanyamV., & LinC. M. (2012). Competitiveness in India and China: The FDI puzzle. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(3), 303–333.
63.
PugelT. A. (2016). International Economics (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
64.
RadaC., & Von ArnimR. (2012). Structural transformation in China and India: A note on macroeconomic policies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(3), 264–275.
65.
RaghuramapatruniR. (2012). China and India: Economic performance, competition and cooperation. Foreign Trade Review, 46(4), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732515120403
66.
RaghutlaC. (2020). The effect of trade openness on economic growth: Some empirical evidence from emerging market economies. Journal of Public Affairs, 20 (3), e2081. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2081
67.
RahmanM. M., RanaR. H., & BaruaS. (2019). The drivers of economic growth in South Asia: Evidence from a dynamic system GMM approach. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(3), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-01-2018-0013
68.
RahmanM. M., SaidiK., & BenMbarek, M (2017). The effects of population growth, environmental quality and trade openness on economic growth. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(3), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-02-2016-0031
69.
RosenG. (1992). Contrasting styles of industrial reform: China and India in the 1980s. University of Chicago Press.
70.
SakyiD., VillaverdeJ., & MazaA. (2015). Trade openness, income levels, and economic growth: The case of developing countries, 1970–2009. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 24(6), 860–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2014.971422
71.
SamuelsonP. A. (1952). The transfer problem and transport costs: The terms of trade when impediments are absent. The Economic Journal, 62(246), 278–304.
72.
SharmaS. K., NarayananG. B., DobhalA., & AkhterR. (2023). Evaluating the reasons for India’s withdrawal from RCEP: A general equilibrium analysis. The Indian Economic Journal, 71(3), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662231159847
SilvaJ. S., & TenreyroS. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.
75.
SinghR., & SinghS. (2020). Domestic sources of India’s trade policy preferences in RCEP negotiations. Journal of World Trade, 54(4), 503–530.
76.
SinglaS. K. (2015). An analysis of India’s export performance with China. Foreign Trade Review, 50(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732515589443
77.
SrinivasanT. (2004). China and India: Economic performance, competition and cooperation: An update. Journal of Asian Economics, 15(4), 613–636.
78.
TolentinoP. E. (2010). Home country macroeconomic factors and outward FDI of China and India. Journal of International Management, 16(2), 102–120.
79.
UNCTADSTAT. (2021, September15). Merchandise: Total trade and share, annual. UNCTAD. Retrieved September17, 2021 from https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_ChosenLang=en
80.
ValliV. (2017). The economic rise of China and India. Accademia University Press.
81.
VermaR. (2020). The regional comprehensive economic partnership and India: A test case of Narendra Modi’s statesmanship. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(5), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1725425
82.
WangC., & SharmaV. (2021). India’s RCEP dilemma with China: Beyond the legal texts. Pacific Focus, 36(1), 40–62.
83.
WesleyM. (2015). Trade agreements and strategic rivalry in Asia. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69(5), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1048783
84.
WooT.-o. (1998). Foreign trade and investment policies in the post–Deng era. InChina in the post-Deng era (pp. 363–424). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
85.
World Bank. (2004). Global economic prospects 2005: Trade, regionalism, and development. The World Bank.
86.
World Bank. (2021a, September15). GDP, PPP (current international $). World development indicators. The World Bank. Retrieved September19, 2021 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.CD
87.
World Bank. (2021b, September15). Population, total. World development indicators. The World Bank. Retrieved September19, 2021 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
88.
WuY. (2012). Understanding economic growth in China and India: A comparative study of selected issues. World Scientific.
89.
WuY., & ZhouZ. (2006). Changing bilateral trade between China and India. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(3), 509–518.
90.
YotovY. V., PiermartiniR., MonteiroJ. A., & LarchM. (2016). An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. World Trade Organization.
91.
ZhengP. (2009). A comparison of FDI determinants in China and India. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(3), 263–279.
92.
ZhengY. (2016). Institutions, labor mobility, and foreign direct investment in China and India. Studies in Comparative International Development, 51(2), 147–168.
