This study offers a comprehensive examination of India’s bilateral services exports at a disaggregated sectoral level, covering 12 service sectors and 180 partner countries during 2005–2021. Using the OECD-WTO BaTiS data set within a gravity framework, it identifies the trends and factors driving India’s services exports. We augment the analysis by calculating gravity-based, sector-specific ad valorem estimates of non-tariff barriers imposed by partner countries. Our findings suggest that the United States, the United Kingdom, Singapore, the Netherlands and Germany impose the least barriers on Indian services. Gravity results indicate that, unlike in goods trade, geographical distance has a weaker and less-robust effect on service flows, while linguistic ties play a more important role. India’s services exports are typically higher than countries with which it has strong goods–trade relationships, but trade agreements do not significantly boost services exports. Sector-specific factors—mobile cellular penetration for telecom, shipping connectivity for transport and R&D share in GDP for other business services—also emerge as significant. By conducting a sectoral analysis for a large set of partner countries, the study contributes novel empirical evidence to an underexplored dimension of trade from a major emerging economy perspective.
AndersonJ. E., BorchertI., MattooA., & YotovY. V. (2018). Dark costs, missing data: Shedding some light on services trade. European Economic Review, 105, 193–214.
2.
AndersonJ. E., & Van WincoopE. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
3.
AriuA., & NilssonH. K. (2025). What explains the success of emerging Asia’s service exporters?Asian Development Bank.
4.
AriuA., & OgliariL. (2023). Services’ trade in Africa: Structure and growth. The World Economy, 46(11), 3345–3366.
5.
BalassaB. (1965). Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33, 99–123.
6.
BenzS., & JaaxA. (2020). Services trade costs in the United States: A simulation based on the OECD services trade restrictiveness index (OECD Economic Department Working Paper No. 1617), 1–19.
7.
BhagwatiJ. N. (1984) Splintering and disembodiment of services and developing nations. World Economy, 7(2), 133–144.
8.
BurangeL., ChaddhaS. J., & KapoorP. (2010). India’s trade in services. The Indian Economic Journal, 58(2), 44–62.
9.
BurgerM. J., ThissenM. J., Van OortF. G., & DiodatoD. (2014). The magnitude and distance decay of trade in goods and services: New evidence for European countries. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(3), 231–259.
10.
ChandaR., & TokasK. (2020). India–Japan relations in services & the India–Japan comprehensive economic partnership agreement. IIM Bangalore.
11.
CopelandB., & MattooA. (2008). The basic economics of services trade. In MattooA., SternR. M., & ZanniniG. (Eds.), A handbook of international trade in services (pp. 84–129). Oxford University Press.
12.
CorreiaS., Guimar˜aesP., & ZylkinT. (2020) Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. The Stata Journal, 20(1), 95–115.
13.
DaoN. T., PhamV. N., & DoanQ. H. (2014). Analyzing the determinants of services trade flow between Vietnam and European Union: Gravity model approach. MPRA.
14.
DasS., & SarmaA. (2021). Growth behaviour of India’s export of services, 1975–2018. Foreign Trade Review, 56(3), 301–321.
15.
DeP. (2013). Assessing barriers to trade in services in India: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Integration, 28(1), 108–143.
16.
DeardorffA. V. (1984). Comparative advantage and international trade and investment in services. Citeseer.
17.
DeeP., HanslowK., & PhamducT. (2003). Measuring the cost of barriers to trade in services. In ItoT. & KruegerA. O. (Eds.), Services trade in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 11–43). University of Chicago Press.
18.
EichengreenB., & GuptaP. (2013). Exports of services: Indian experience in perspective. Indian Growth and Development Review, 6(1), 35–60.
19.
EvangelistaR., LuccheseM., & MelicianiV. (2015). Business services and the export performances of manufacturing industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25, 959–981.
20.
FillatCastejon C., FrancoisJ. F., & W¨orzJ. (2008). Cross-border trade and FDI in services (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7074). Centre for Economic Policy Research.
21.
FontagnéL., GuillinA., & MitaritonnaC. (2011). Estimation of tariff equivalents for the services sector [Conference paper]. CEPII Research Center.
22.
FrancoisJ., & HoekmanB. (2010). Services trade and policy. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(3), 642–692.
23.
FreundC. L., & WeinholdD. (2004). The effect of the internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 171–189.
24.
GrossoM. G., GonzalesF., MiroudotS., Nord˚asH. K., RouzetD., & UenoA. (2015). Services trade restrictiveness index (STRI): Scoring and weighting methodology (OECD Trade Policy Papers). OECD Publishing.
25.
Gru¨nfeldL. A., & MoxnesA. (2003). The intangible globalization: Explaining the patterns of international trade in services. NUPI.
26.
HeadK., & MayerT. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In Handbook of international economics (Vol. 4, pp. 131)–195). Elsevier.
27.
HeadK., MayerT., & RiesJ. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81(1), 1–14.
28.
HellmanzikC., & SchmitzM. (2016). Gravity and international services trade: The impact of virtual proximity. European Economic Review, 77(1), 82–101.
29.
KaurS., KhoranaS., & KaurM. (2020). Is there any potential in service trade of South Asia?Foreign Trade Review, 55(3), 402–417.
30.
KimuraF. & LeeH. H. (2006). The gravity equation in international trade in services. Review of World Economics, 142, 92–121.
31.
KoxH. L., & NordåsH. K. (2007). Services trade and domestic regulation (Working Paper No. 49). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
32.
LejourA., & de Palva VerheijdenJ. W. (2004). Services trade within Canada and the European Union: What do they have in common? (CPB Discussion Paper No. 42). CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
33.
LennonC. (2009). Trade in services and trade in goods: Differences and complementarities (WIIW Working Paper No. 53). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
34.
LiN., MeleshchukS., YinQ., ZhaoD., & ZymekR., (2025). Bilateral trade in services: Insights from a new research dataset. International Monetary Fund.
35.
MiroudotS., SauvageJ., & ShepherdB. (2013). Measuring the cost of international trade in services. World Trade Review, 12(4), 719–735.
36.
NeumayerE. (2004). The impact of political violence on tourism: Dynamic cross-national estimation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(2), 259–281.
37.
OumT. H., WuX., & WangK. (2024). Impact of air connectivity on bilateral service export and import trade: The case of China. Transport Policy, 148, 219–233.
38.
PandeyD., & UnnikrishnanM. (2023). Free trade agreements (FTAs) by India: Review and implications for future. In IIMA Research and Policy Insights on Financial Markets and Economy (pp. 1–19). Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad.
39.
ParkS. (2002). Measuring tariff equivalents in cross-border trade in services. East Asian bureau of economic research (Working Paper No. 353). Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
40.
ReverdyC. (2023). Estimating the general equilibrium effects of services trade liberalization. Review of International Economics, 31(2), 493–521.
41.
SahooP., & DashR. K. (2014). India’s surge in modern services exports: Empirics for policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(6), 1082–1100.
42.
SampsonG. P., & SnapeR. H. (1985). Identifying the issues in trade in services. World Economy, 8(2), 171–182.
43.
SilvaJ. S., & TenreyroS. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.
44.
Sinha RoyA., AdityaA., ChattopadhyayS., & MarjitS. (2024). Comparative advantage in the 24/7 economy: Time-zone differences and service trade flows (CESifo Working Paper No. 11290). CESifo.
45.
TangY., ZhangY., & FindlayC. (2013). What explains China’s rising trade in services? Empirical analysis with a modified gravity model and panel data. Chinese Economy, 46(6), 7–31.
46.
TinbergenJ. (1962). Shaping the world economy; Suggestions for an international economic policy. Twentieth Century Fund.
47.
UN. (2014). World economic situation and prospects 2014. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wesp2014_en.pdf
48.
UNCTAD. (2022). Analysis of maritime connectivity in the association of South East Asian nations and small island developing states in the Pacific. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtltlb2022d1_en.pdf
49.
UNCTAD. (2023). Handbook of statistics 2023. UN Trade & Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdstat48_en.pdf
50.
Van der MarelE., & ShepherdB. (2013). Services trade, regulation and regional integration: Evidence from sectoral data. The World Economy, 36(11), 1393–1405.
51.
WalshK. (2008). Trade in services: Does gravity hold?Journal Of World Trade, 42, 315–343.
52.
WTO. (2024). Global trade outlook and statistics. Technical report, World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/trade_outlook24_e.pdf
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
