This study was designed to explore characteristics of exceptional teachers of gifted students. Participants included 63 teachers and 1,247 highly able students. Teachers responded to 2 measures: a background questionnaire and the Myers Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI), a self-report personality inventory. Students also completed the MBTI. In response to the background questionnaire, the majority of teachers reported holding advanced degrees in a content area; most were not certified to teach and reported completing no formal coursework in gifted education. Results from the MBTI indicated that exemplary teachers were more likely to prefer N (intuition) and T (thinking), as compared to a normative teacher sample. The personality types of teachers were in many ways similar to the personality types of the gifted students. These findings suggest that teachers who are judged to be highly effective in working with gifted students prefer abstract themes and concepts, are open and flexible, and value logical analysis and objectivity. Results suggest that teacher personality and cognitive style may play a role in his or her effectiveness in teaching gifted students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barto, V. A. (1998). The relationship between personality traits of selected New Jersey public high school educators and successful academic achievement of at-risk students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(4A), 1015-1015.
2.
Bishop, W. E. (1968, January). Successful teachers of the gifted. Exceptional Children, 317-325.
3.
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Whitrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York: MacMillan.
4.
Carlson, J. G. (1985). Recent assessments of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 356-365.
5.
Chandler, L. A., & Bean, R. M. (1998). The personalities of exemplary teachers. Journal of Research in Education, 8, 64-67.
6.
Clark, D. J., & Guest, K. (1995). Voila: Screening personality traits of teachers. Executive Educator, 17, 18-22.
7.
Cummings, W. H., III. (1995). Age group differences and estimated frequencies of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator preferences. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 28(2), 69-78.
8.
Fisher, D. L., & Kent, H. B. (1998). Associations between teacher personality and classroom environment. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33(1), 5-13.
9.
Furnham, A. (1996). The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 303-307.
10.
Golay, K. (1982). Learning patterns and temperamental styles. Newport Beach, CA: Manas-Systems.
11.
Hawkins, J. (1998). Giftedness and psychological type. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 57-67.
12.
Heath, W. J. (1997). What are the most effective characteristics of teachers of the gifted? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 411-665)
13.
Hicks, L. E. (1984). Conceptual and empirical analysis of some assumptions of an explicitly typological theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1118-1131.
14.
Howley, A., Howley, C. B., & Pendarvis, E. D. (1986). Teaching gifted children. Boston: Little, Brown.
15.
Jackson, S., Parker, C., & Dupboye, R. (1996). A comparison of competing models underlying responses to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 99-115.
16.
Johnson, A. K. (1997). Conflict-handling intentions and the MBTI: A construct validity study. Journal of Psychological Type, 43, 29-39.
17.
Kalsbeek, D. H. (1989). Linking learning style theory with retention research: The Trails Project. Association for Institutional Research, 32, 1-7.
18.
Kiersey, D., & Bates, M. (1984). Please understand me: Character and temperament types. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Book Co.
19.
Macdaid, G. P., McCaulley, M. H., & Kainz, R. I. (1986). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Atlas of type tables. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
20.
MacDonald, D. A., Anderson, P. E., Tsagarakis, C. I., & Holland, C. J. (1994). Examination of the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 74, 339-344.
21.
Mandrell. C., & Fiscus, E. (1981). Understanding exceptional people. New York: West Publishing.
22.
McCaulley, M. H., & Natter, F. L. (1974). Psychological (Myers-Briggs) type differences in education. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
23.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17-40.
24.
Milgram, R. M. (1979). Perception of teacher behavior in gifted and nongifted children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 125-128.
25.
Mills, C. J. (1993). Personality, learning style, and cognitive style profiles of mathematically talented students. European Journal for High Ability, 4, 70-85.
26.
Mills, C. J., Moore, N., & Parker, W. D. (1996). Psychological type and cognitive style in elementary age gifted students: Comparisons across age and gender. Journal of Psychological Type, 38, 13-23.
27.
Mills, C. J., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cognitive-psychological profiles of gifted adolescents from Ireland and the U.S.: Cross-societal comparisons. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 1-16.
28.
Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
29.
Nordvik, H., & Brovold, H. (1998). Personality traits in leadership tasks. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 61-64.
30.
Parker, W., & Stumpf, H. (1998). A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1005-1025.
31.
Provost, J. A., Carson, B. H., & Beidler, P. G. (1987). Teaching excellence and type. Journal of Psychological Type, 13, 23-33.
32.
Renzulli, J. S. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity in young people. In F. J. Mönks & W. A. M. Peters (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children: Talent for the future (pp. 51-72). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
33.
Robertson, J. (1997). MBTI and college students. Learning Assistance Review, 2(2), 35-42.
34.
Sears, S. J., Kennedy, J. J., & Kaye, G. L. (1997). Myers-Briggs personality profiles of prospective educators. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 195-202.
35.
Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
Sikora, D. A. (1999). Observable teacher effectiveness and personality types of family and consumer sciences teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A, 59(7-A), 2285.
37.
Sisk, D. (1989). Creative teaching of the gifted. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Tischler, L. (1994). The MBTI factor structure. Journal of Psychological Type, 31, 24-31.
39.
Thorne, A., & Gough, H. (1991). Portraits of type: An MBTI research compendium. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
40.
Tzidkiyahu, S. (1975). The ideal teacher in the eyes of teachers and pupils. Hachinuch: Journal of Educational Thought, 2-3, 155-164.
41.
Westberg, K. L., & Archambault, F. X. (1997). A multi-site case study of successful classroom practices for high-ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 42-51.
42.
Whitlock, M. S., & DuCette, J. P. (1989). Outstanding and average teachers of the gifted: A comparative study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 15-21.
43.
Willing, D. C., Guest, K., & Morford, J. (2001). Who is entering the teaching profession? MBTI profiles of 25 masters in teaching students. Journal of Psychological Type, 59, 36-44.
