The authors conduct open-ended surveys of 530 students and teachers in three publicly funded schools with different approaches to providing a high-ability “school-within-a-school”: a gifted program, an international baccalaureate program, and a high-ability program with a science focus. Overall, the authors find that teachers and students in all of these gifted programs express strong satisfaction with their academic programs. At the same time, however, all groups (students and teachers in gifted and regular programs at all three schools) express concerns about the relationship between the special gifted programs and the schools within which they are housed. Based on an analysis of stakeholders' concerns and suggestions in the contexts of the different schools' approaches to integration, suggestions are made for and questions are raised about fostering a positive school climate in secondary schools that offer programming for high-ability learners.
Bogdan, R.C. , & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
2.
Borland, J.H. (2003a). Evaluating gifted programs: A broader perspective . In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 293-310). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
3.
Borland, J.H. (2003b). Rethinking gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press .
4.
Callahan, C.M. (2000). Evaluation as a critical component of program development and implementation. In K. A. Heller , F. J. Monks , R. J. Sternberg , & R. F. Subotnik , (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 537-547). Oxford , UK: Elsevier Science .
5.
Callahan, C.M. (2003). Searching for answers or creating more questions? A response to Robinson . Journal for the Education of the Gifted , 26, 274-282 .
6.
Carmines, E.G. , & Zeller, R.A. (1991). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
7.
Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted. Columbus, OH: Merrill .
8.
Conant, J.B. (1946). General education in a free society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
9.
Davis, G.A. , & Rimm, S.B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
10.
Delcourt, M.A.B. , Loyd, B.H. , Cornell, D.G. , & Goldberg, M.D. (1994). Evaluation of the effects of programming arrangements on student learning outcomes. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Storrs : The University of Connecticut .
11.
Dewees, S. (1999). School-within-a-school model (ERIC Digest). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED438147)
12.
Donovan, M.S. , & Cross, C.T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press .
13.
Ford, D.Y. (2003). Two other wrongs don't make a right: Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education's unresolved problems . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 283-291 .
14.
Futerman, D. (1989). Excellence and equality: A qualitatively different perspective on gifted and talented education. New York : State University of New York Press .
15.
Gardner, J. (1961). Excellence, can we be equal and excellent too ? New York: Harper & Brothers .
16.
Gootman, E. (2004, April 11). City's small schools uneasy inside the big ones . The New York Times, p. 1 .
17.
Herszenhorn, D.M. (2005, January 14). In push for small schools, other schools suffer . The New York Times, p. 1 .
18.
Howley, C.B. , & Bickel, R. (2000). Results of a four-state study: Smaller schools reduce harmful impact of poverty on student achievement. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust .
19.
Jordan, A. (2000, July). Ontario, Canada: Reversing the gains made in special education. Paper presented at the International Special Education Conference, Manchester , England.
20.
Kulik, J.A. (2003). Grouping and tracking. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 268-281). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
21.
Lee, V.E. , & Smith, J.B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement . Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241-270 .
22.
Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. , Benbow, C.P. , Assouline, S.G. , & Brody, L.E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 204-218). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
23.
Matthews, D.J. , & Smyth, E.M. (2000). Gifted learners in Ontario enter the new millennium: Common sense style? Alberta Gifted and TalentedEducation , 14(2), 53-59 .
24.
McAndrews, T. , & Anderson, W. (2002). Schools within schools (ERIC Digest). Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EA031493)
25.
McLeod, J. , & Cropley, A. (1989). Fostering academic excellence. Oxford , UK: Pergamon .
26.
Merriam, S.B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
27.
Milner, M., Jr. (2004). Freaks, geeks and cool kids: American teenagers, schools and the culture of consumption. New York: Routledge .
28.
Moon, S.M. , & Rosselli, H.C. (2000). Developing gifted programs . In K. Heller , F. J. Monks , R. J. Sternberg , & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness & talent (2nd ed., pp. 499-522). Oxford , UK: Elsevier Science .
29.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality . New Haven: CT: Yale University Press .
30.
Ragin, C.C. , & Becker, H.S. (1992). What is a case: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press .
31.
Raywid, M.A. (1985). Family choice arrangements in public schools: A review of the literature . Review of Educational Research , 55(4), 435-467 .
32.
Raywid, M.A. (1995). The subschools/small schools movement— taking stock. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED397490)
33.
Reinke, W.M. , & Herman, K.C. (2002) Strategies for behavioral change: Creating school environments that deter antisocial behaviors in youth . Psychology in Schools, 39(5), 549-559 .
34.
Robinson, N.M. (2003). Two wrongs do not make a right: Sacrificing the needs of gifted students does not solve society's unsolved problems . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(4), 251-273 .
35.
Rogers, K.B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner (RBDM 9102). Storrs: University of Connecticut, the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented .
36.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany: State University of New York Press .
37.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (2003). Equity, excellence and school reform: Why is finding common ground so hard? In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 127-142). New York: Teachers College Press .
38.
Tannenbaum, A.J. (2000). A history of giftedness in school and society . In K. A. Heller , F. J. Monks , R. J. Sternberg , & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 23-53). Oxford , UK: Elsevier Science .
39.
Tomlinson, C.A. , Coleman, M.R. , Allan, S. , Udall, S. , & Landrum, M. (1996). Interface between gifted education and general education: Toward communication, cooperation, and collaboration . Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(3), 165-171 .
40.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2000). Theory and research on curriculum development for the gifted. In K. Heller , F. J. Monks , R. J. Sternberg , & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness & talent (2nd ed., pp. 345-366). Oxford , UK: Elsevier Science .
