Boys identified as learning-disabled gifted or twice exceptional, at two different grade levels (5th or 6th grades, and 11th or 12th grades), were asked to read a history text with unknown vocabulary words, internal inconsistencies, and prior knowledge violations inserted to make immediate comprehension difficult. The students were asked to read one sentence at a time and report their thoughts verbally. Their verbalizations were analyzed for evidence of how they used metacognitive skills. The older students actively monitored and evaluated their comprehension as they tried to make sense of the text but were more willing to accept problematic text. The younger students were not as active in monitoring their comprehension, but they were less likely to accept the prior knowledge violations.
Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
2.
Barton, J.M., & Starnes, W.T. (1989). Identifying distinguishing characteristics of gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review , 12, 23-29.
3.
Baum, S. (1984). Meeting the needs of learning-disabled gifted students. Roeper Review, 7, 16-19.
4.
Baum, S. (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning-disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226-230.
5.
Baum, S. (1994). Meeting the needs of gifted/learning disabled students: How far have we come? Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 5(3), 6-22.
6.
Baum, S., Cooper, C.R., & Neu, T.W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 477-490.
7.
Baum, S., Emerick, L.J., Herman, G.N., & Dixon, J. (1989). Identification, programs and enrichment strategies for gifted learning disabled youth. Roeper Review, 12, 48-53.
8.
Baum, S., & Owen, S.V. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321-326.
9.
Baum, S.M., Owen, S.V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled . . . From definition to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
10.
Bempechat, J. (2000). Getting our kids back on track: Educating children for the future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Borkowski, J.G. (1985). Signs of intelligence: Strategy generalization and metacognition. In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 105-144). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
12.
Borkowski, J.G., & Peck, V.A. (1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 182-200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Bos, C.S., & Filip, D. (1982). Comprehension monitoring skills in learning disabled and average students. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities , 2(1), 79-86.
14.
Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem in metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Brown, A.L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Brown, A.L. (1982). Learning how to learn from reading. In J. A. Langer & M. T. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author/bridging the gap (pp. 26-54). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17.
Brown, A.L. (1985). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 501-526). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18.
Brown, A.L. & DeLoache, J.S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self regulation. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 3-35). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Brown, A.L., & Palinscar, A.S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.
20.
Coleman, M.R. (1992). A comparison of how gifted/ld and average/ ld boys cope with school frustration. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 239-265.
21.
Coleman, M.R. (1994). Post-secondary education decisions for gifted/learning disabled students. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 5(3), 53-59.
Davidson, J.E. (1986). The role of insight in giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151-181). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Education for all Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. 94-142.
25.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Flower, L.S., Hayes, J.R., & Swarts, H. (1983). Reader-based revision of functional documents: The scenario principle. In P. V. Anderson , J. Brockmann, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 41-58). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
28.
Fox, L.H. (1983). Gifted students with reading problems: An empirical study. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin, (Eds.). Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 117-139). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
29.
Fox, L.H., Brody, L., & Tobin, D. (1983). Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
30.
Friedman, R. C., & Shore, B. M. (Eds.). (2000). Talents unfolding: Cognition and development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
Gallagher, J.J., & Courtright, R.D. (1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 93-111). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Garner, R. (1981). Monitoring of passage inconsistency among poor comprehenders: A preliminary test of the “piecemeal processing” explanation. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 159-162.
33.
Ginn Studies in Canadian History: Teacher's Manual. (1972). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ginn.
34.
Greeno, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein , G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol.2. Learning and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 589-672). New York: John Wiley.
35.
Haller, E.P., Child, D.A., & Walberg, H.J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of “metacognitive” studies. Educational Researcher , 17(9), 5-8.
36.
hannah, C.L., & Shore, B.M. (1995). Metacognition and high intellectual ability: Insights from the study of learning-disabled gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 95-109.
37.
Howard, J.B. (1994). Addressing needs through strengths: Five instructional practices for use with gifted/learning disabled students. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 5(3), 23-34.
38.
Johnston, P.H., & Afflerbach, P. (1985). The process of constructing main ideas from text. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 207-232.
39.
Kanevsky, L.S. (1990). Pursuing qualitative differences in the flexible use of a problem-solving strategy by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115-140.
40.
Lobel, T.E., & Bempechat, J. (1993). Children's need for approval and achievement motivation: An instructional approach. European Journal of Personality , 7(1), 37-46.
41.
Lomax, R.G. (1984). A component process model of reading comprehension development: A comparison of normal and learning-disabled children. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 33, 308-316.
42.
Maker, C.J. (1977). Providing programs for the gifted handicapped . Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
43.
Masson, M.E.J. (1982). A framework of cognitive and metacognitive determinants of reading skill. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities , 2(1), 37-44.
44.
McGuire, K.L., & Yewchuk, C.R. (1996). Use of metacognitive reading strategies by gifted learning disabled students: An exploratory study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 293-314.
45.
Miller, W.H. (1974). Reading diagnosis kit. New York: Center for Applied Research in Education.
46.
Montague, M. (1991). Gifted and learning disabled gifted students' knowledge and use of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 393-411.
47.
Myers, M., & Paris, S.G. (1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading . Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.
48.
Nielsen, M.E. (1994). Helping twice-exceptional students to succeed in high school: A program description. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 5(3), 35-39.
49.
Nielsen, M.E., & Mortorff-Albert, S. (1989). The effects of special education service on the self-concept and school attitude of learning-disabled/gifted students. Roeper Review, 12, 29-36.
50.
Oakhill, J. (1995). Development of reading. In V. Lee & P. Das Gupta (Eds.), Children's cognitive and language development (pp. 269-299). Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
51.
Olenchak, F.R. (1995). Effects of enrichment on gifted/learning-disabled students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 385-399.
52.
Paris, S.G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5-22.
53.
Rosner, S.L., & Seymour, J. (1983). The gifted child with a learning disability: Clinical evidence. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin, (1983). Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 77-97). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
54.
Schiff, M.M., Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1981). Scatter analysis of WISC-R profiles for learning-disabled children with superior intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 14, 400-404.
55.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1988). Acquisition and transfer of learning strategies by gifted and nongifted students. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 153-166.
56.
Shore, B.M. (1982). Developing a framework for the study of learning style in high-level learning. In J. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles and brain behavior (pp. 152-156). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
57.
Shore, B.M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167-187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
58.
Shore, B.M., & Carey, S.M. (1984). Verbal ability and spatial task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 255-259.
59.
Shore, B.M., & Dover, A.C. (1987). Metacognition, intelligence, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 37-39.
60.
Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems . In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 325-347). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Smith, D.C. (1971). The seigneury of Longueuil. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ginn.
62.
Sternberg, R.J. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness . Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86-93.
63.
Sternberg, R.J. (1984). What should intelligence tests test? Implications of a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13, 5-15.
64.
Suter, D.P., & Wolf, J.S. (1987). Issues in the identification and programming of the gifted/learning disabled child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 227-237.
65.
Swarts, H., Flower, L.S., & Hayes, J.R. (1984). Designing protocol studies of the writing process: An introduction. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 53-71). New York: Guilford.
66.
U. S. Commissioner of Education. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented (Document No. 72-5020). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office
Zinar, S. (2000). The relative contributions of word identification skill and comprehension-monitoring behavior in reading comprehension ability . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 363-377.
