This article investigates gender differences in 181 gifted and 181 average-ability sixth graders in achievement, academic self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Giftedness was conceptualized as nonverbal reasoning ability and defined by a rank of at least 95% on a nonverbal reasoning subscale of the German Cognitive Abilities Test. Mathematical achievement was measured by teacher-assigned grades and a standardized mathematics test. Self-concept, interest, and motivation were assessed by questionnaire. In both ability groups, boys earned significantly higher test scores but there were no gender differences in grades. Girls scored lower on measures of academic self-concept, interest, and motivation. Gender differences were larger in gifted than in average-ability students. Ability group differences for self-concept and interest were only found for boys in favor of the gifted. Results support the assumption that gender differences in self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics are more prevalent in gifted than in average-ability students.
Achter, J.A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1996). Multipotentiality among intellectually gifted: "It was never there and already its vanishing."Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 65-76.
2.
Anderson, E.B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Raschmodel. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
3.
Baumert, J., Bos, W. , & Lehmann, R. (Eds.) ( 2000). TIMSS/III: Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie- Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn [TIMSS/III: Third international mathematics and science study-Education in math and science at the end of school training]. Opladen , Germany: Leske + Budrich.
4.
Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (1998). Interest research in secondary level I: An overview . In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 241-256). Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Kiel.
5.
Benbow, C.P., & Lubinski, D. (1993). Psychological profiles of the mathematically talented: Some gender differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In K. Ackerill (Ed.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 44-59) [Ciba Foundation Symposium No. 178]. New York: John Wiley & Sons .
6.
Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Brody, L.E., Barnett, L.B., & Mills, C.J. (1994). Gender differences among talented adolescents: Research studies by SMPY and CTY at the Johns Hopkins University. In K. A. Heller & E. A. Hany (Eds.), Competence and responsibility: Proceedings of the Third European Conference of the European Council for High Ability (pp. 204-210). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
8.
Byrne, B.M., & Gavin, D.A.W. (1996). The Shavelson model revisited: Testing for structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 215-228.
9.
Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Eccles, J.S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
13.
Eccles, J.S. (1987). Gender roles and womens achievement-related decisions . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135-172.
14.
Eccles, J.S. (1993). Parents as gender-role socializers during middle childhood and adolescence. New Orleans, LA: Society for Research in Child Development.
15.
Eccles, J.S., Adler, T., & Meece, J.L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.
16.
Eccles, J.S., & Harold, R.D. (1992). Gender differences in educational and occupational patterns among the gifted. In N. Colangelo , S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Amronson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings form the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 3-29). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
17.
Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R.D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in childrens self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830-847.
18.
Educational Testing Service. (1987). A summary of data collected from Graduate Record Examinations test-takers during 1985-86. Princeton, NJ: Author.
19.
Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 968-980.
20.
Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H.A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
21.
Embretson, S.E., & Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Enman, M., & Lupart, J. (2000). Talented female students resistance to science: An exploratory study of post-secondary achievement motivation, persistence, and epistemological characteristics. High Ability Studies , 11, 161-178.
23.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 30, 415-441.
24.
Ewert, O. (1979). Eine deutsche Version der Sears Self-concept Inventory Scale [Sears self-concept inventory scale-German version]. In S. H. Filipp (Ed.), Selbstkonzept-Forschung (pp. 191-202). Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
25.
Finsterwald, M., & Ziegler, A. (2002). Geschlechtsunterschiede in der Motivation: Ist die Situation bei normal begabten und hoch begabten Schüler(inne)n gleich? [Gender differences in motivation: Is the situation comparable for gifted and nongifted female students?]. In H. Wagner (Ed.), Hoch begabte Mädchen und Frauen.Begabungsentwicklung und Geschlechtsunterschiede (pp. 67-83). Bad Honnef, Germany: Bock.
26.
Fox, L.H., Engle, J.L., & Paek, P. (2001). An exploratory study of social factors and mathematics achievement among high-scoring students: Cross-cultural perspective from TIMSS . Gifted and Talented International, 16, 7-15.
27.
Freeman, C.E. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women: 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
28.
Freeman, J. (2003). Gender differences in gifted achievement in Britain and the U.S. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 202-211.
29.
Freeman, J. (2004). Cultural influences on gifted gender achievement . High Ability Studies, 15, 7-23.
30.
Frome, P.M., & Eccles, J.S. (1998). Parents influence on childrens achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74, 435-452.
31.
Gallagher, A.M., & Kaufmann, J.C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Grossman, M., & Wood, W. (1993). Sex differences in intensity of emotional experience: A social role interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1010-1022.
33.
Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Hanna, G. (2000). Declining gender differences from FIMS to TIMSS . International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 32, 11-17.
35.
Hannover, B. (1998). The development of self-concept and interests . In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 105-125). Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Kiel.
36.
Heller, K.A., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4-12+R) [Cognitive ability test for class level 4 to 12, revised version]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe .
37.
Heller, K.A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the natural sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females ? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200-210.
38.
Hofe, R. vom, Pekrun, R., Kleine, M., & Goetz, T. (2002). Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA). Konstruktion des Regensburger Mathematikleistungstests für 5.-10 Klassen [Project for the analysis of achievement development in mathematics: Construction of a mathematics achievement test for grades 5 to 10]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45. Beiheft. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
39.
Holland, J.L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
40.
Holling, H., & Preckel, F. (2005). Self-estimation of intelligence- Methodological approaches and gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 503-517.
41.
Hosenfeld, I., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (1999). Why sex differences in mathematics achievement disappear in German secondary schools: A reanalysis of the German TIMSS-data . Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 143-161.
42.
Hyde, J.S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S.J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
43.
Jacobs, J.E., & Eccles, J.S. (1992). The impact of mothers gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers and childrens ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944.
44.
Jäger, A.O., Holling, H., Preckel, F., Schulze, R., Vock, M., Süß, H.-M., et al. (2006). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test für Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BIS-HB) [Berlin structure of intelligence test for youth: Assessment of talent and giftedness]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
45.
Kerr, B., & Robinson Kurpius, S.E. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15, 85-102.
46.
Leahey, E., & Guo, G. (2001). Gender differences in mathematical trajectories . Social Forces, 80, 713-732.
47.
Leder, G. (2004). Gender differences among gifted students: Contemporary views. High Ability Studies, 15,103-108.
48.
Le Maistre, C., & Kanevsky, L. (1996). Factors influencing the realization of exceptional mathematical ability in girls: An analysis of the research. High Ability Studies, 8, 31-46.
49.
Lohman, D.F. (2005). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 111-136.
50.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math/science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66.
51.
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P., & Morelock, M. (2000). Gender differences in engineering and the physical sciences among the gifted: An inorganic-organic distinction. In K. Heller, F. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 633-648). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
52.
Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L.G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327-355.
53.
Lupart, J.L., Cannon, E., & Telfer, J.O. (2004). Gender differences in adolescent academic achievement, interests, values, and life-role expectations. High Ability Studies, 15, 25-42.
54.
Marsh, H.W. (1988). Self description questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
55.
Marsh, H.W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory measurement and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-720.
57.
Nuttal, R.L., Casey, M.B., & Pezaris, E. (2004). Spatial ability as mediator of gender differences on mathematical tests: A biological-environmental framework. In A. Gallager & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp.121-142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). PISA 2003 assessment framework-Mathematics, reading, science, and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris : Author.
59.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrows world-First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.
60.
Pajares, F., Britner, S., & Valiante, G. (2000). Writing and science achievement goals of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406-422.
61.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
62.
Pekrun, R. (1992). The expectancy-value theory of anxiety: Overview and implications. In D. G. Forgays, T. Sosnowski, & K. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Anxiety: Recent developments in self-appraisal, psychophysiological and health research (pp. 23-41). Washington, DC : Hemisphere.
63.
Pekrun, R. (1993). Facets of students academic motivation: A longitudinal expectancy-value approach. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 8, pp. 139-189). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
64.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A.C. (2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEQ-M)-Users manual. Munich, Germany: University of Munich.
65.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., vom Hofe, R., Blum, W., Jullien, S., Zirngibl, A., et al.. (2004). Emotionen und Leistung im Fach Mathematik: Ziele und erste Befunde aus dem Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA) [Emotions and achievement in mathematics: Aims and first results of the Project for the Analysis of Learning and Achievement in Mathematics (PALMA)]. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schülerförderung als Strategien der Qualitätsverbesserung (pp. 345-363). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
66.
Pekrun, R., & Zirngibl, A. (2004). Schülermerkmale im Fach Mathematik [Student characteristics in mathematics]. In M. Prenzel, J. Baumert, W. Blum, R. Lehmann, D. Leutner, M. Neubrand, R. Pekrun, H.-G. Rolff, J. Rost , & U. Schiefele (Eds.), PISA 2003. Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland-Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs (pp. 191-210). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
67.
Preckel, F., & Thiemann, H. (2003). Online- versus paper-pencil-version of a high potential intelligence test. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 131-138.
68.
Roznowski, M., Reith, J., & Hong, S. (2000). A further look at youth intellectual giftedness and its correlates: Values, interests, performance, and behavior. Intelligence, 28, 87-113.
69.
Schober, B., Reimann, R., & Wagner, P. (2004). Is research on gender-specific underachievement in gifted girls an obsolete topic? New findings on an often discussed issue . High Ability Studies, 15, 43-62.
70.
Skaalvik, S., & Skaalvik, E.M. (2004). Gender differences in math and verbal self-concept, performance expectations, and motivation. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 50, 241-252.
71.
Sternberg, R.J., & Davidson, J. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Stumpf, H., & Stanley, J.C. (1998). Stability and change in gender-related differences on the college board advanced placement and achievement tests. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 192-196.
73.
Terwilliger, J., & Titus, J. (1995). Gender differences in attitudes and attitude changes among mathematically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly , 39, 29-35.
Todt, E., & Schreiber, S. (1998). Development of interests. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp , K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (1998), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 25-40). Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Kiel.
76.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Suk Yoon, K., Harold, R.D., Arbreton, A.J.A., Freedman-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Change in childrens competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study . Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469.
77.
Wilgenbusch, T., & Merrill, K.W. (1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 101-120.
78.
Ziegler, A. (2004). Gifted females in mathematics, the natural sciences and technology [Special Issue]. High Ability Studies, 15.
79.
Ziegler, A., Heller, K.A., & Broome, P. (1996). Motivational preconditions for girls gifted and highly gifted in physics. High Ability Studies, 7, 129-144.
80.
Zirngibl, A., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R.P. (2005, April). Girls and mathematics-A hopeless issue? An analysis of girls and boys emotional experiences in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
81.
Zorman, R., & David, H. (2000). Female achievement and challenges towards the third millenium. Jerusalem, Israel: Henrietta Szold Institute Press.
