The low representation of culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse (CLED) and high-poverty students in gifted and talented programs has long been an area of concern. This qualitative study investigated methods to increase successful participation of CLED students in gifted programs across the nation. Twenty-five programs were selected for inclusion in the study. Of those, 7 programs were selected for in-depth site visits that included interviews with administrators and teachers, as well as observations. Data suggested five categories that contributed to the successful identification and participation of CLED students in gifted programs. These categories included modified identification procedures; program support systems, such as front-loading (identifying high-potential children and providing opportunities for advanced work prior to formal identification); selecting curriculum/instructional designs that enable CLED students to succeed; building parent/home connections; and using program evaluation practices designed to highlight avenues to CLED students' success.
Arredondo, P. (1999). Multicultural counseling competencies as tools to address oppression and racism. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 102-108.
2.
Baldwin, A.Y. (1978). Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers. Reston , VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
3.
Baldwin, A.Y. (2002) Culturally diverse students who are gifted. Exceptionality, 10(2), 39-47.
4.
Banks, J.A., & McGee-Banks, C.A. (2001). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Bernal, E.M. (2002). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24(2), 82-88.
6.
Briggs, C., & Reis, S.M. (2003). Exemplary Programs for Culturally Diverse Gifted Students Information Matrix (EPCDGS). In C. Briggs, Exemplary interventions and practices that develop the gifts and talents of culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
7.
Briggs, C.J., & Reis, S.M. (2004). Case studies of exemplary gifted programs. In C. A. Tomlinson, D. Y. Ford, S. M. Reis, C. J. Briggs, & C. A. Strickland (Eds.), In search of the dream: Designing schools and classrooms that work for high potential students from diverse cultural backgrounds (pp. 5-32). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
8.
Bruch, C.B. (1975). Assessment of creativity in culturally different children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 164-174.
9.
Callahan, C.M., Hunsaker, S.L., Adams, C.M., Moore, S.D., & Bland, L.C. (1995). Instruments used in the identification of gifted and talented students (RM95139). Storrs: University of Connecticut, the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
10.
Castellano, J.A., & Diaz, E.I. (2002). Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturally and linguistically diverse students. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Deslonde, J. (1977). You know the rules! Myths about desegregation . In D. E. Cross, G. C. Baker, & L. J. Stiles (Eds.), Teaching in a multicultural society: Perspectives and professional strategies (pp. 60-81). New York: Free Press.
13.
Donovan, S. M., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Feldhusen, J.F. (1994). Learning and cognition of talented youth. In J. Van Tassel-Baska (Ed.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (pp. 17-28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Kolloff, M.B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 126-153). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
17.
Ford, D.Y., & Grantham, T.C. (2003). Providing access for culturally diverse gifted students: From deficit to dynamic thinking. Theory Into Practice, 42, 217-225.
18.
Ford, D.Y., & Harmon, D.A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 141-147.
19.
Ford, D.Y., & Harris, J.J. (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Ford, D.Y., Howard, T.C., Harris, J.J., & Tyson, C.A. (2000). Creating culturally responsive classrooms for gifted AfricanAmerican students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 397-427.
21.
Ford, D.Y., Moore, J.L., III., & Milner, H.R. (2005). Beyond colorblindness: A model of culture with implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 27(2), 97-103.
22.
Ford, D.Y., Moore, J.L., III., & Milner, H.R. (2005). Beyond colorblindness: A model of culture with implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 27, 97-103.
23.
Ford, D.Y., & Trotman, M.F. (2001). Teachers of gifted students: Suggested multicultural characteristics and competencies. Roeper Review, 23, 235-239.
24.
Frasier, M.M., Garcia, J.H., & Passow, A.H. (1995). A review of assessment issues in gifted education and their implications for identifying gifted minority students. (RM95204) . Storrs: University of Connecticut, the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
25.
Frasier, M.M., & Passow, A.H. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential (RM9412). Storrs: University of Connecticut, the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26.
Gallagher, J.J. (2002). Societys role in educating gifted students: The role of public policy. (RM02162). Storrs: University of Connecticut, the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
27.
Gallagher, J.J. (2004). No Child Left Behind and gifted education. Roeper Review, 26, 121-123.
28.
Gallagher, J.J., & Gallagher, S.A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child . Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Gallavan, N.P. (1998). Why arent teachers using effective multicultural education practices? In F. Schultz (Ed.), Multicultural education, annual editions (pp. 43-49). Guilford, CT: Dushkin/ McGraw-Hill.
30.
Grossman, H. (1998). Ending discrimination in special education. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
31.
Kaplan, S.N. (1999). Teaching up to the needs of the gifted English language learner. Tempo, 14(2), 20.
32.
Kitano, M.K., & Espinosa, R. (1995). Language diversity and giftedness: Working with gifted English language learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 234-254.
33.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Lohman, D.F. (2005). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(2), 111-139.
35.
Maker, C.J., & Schiever, S.W. (1989). Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
36.
Menendez, R.J. (1995). The identification of creative and talented Puerto Rican primary students. Unpublished dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
37.
Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
38.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Morris, J.E. (2002). African American students and gifted education . Roeper Review, 24, 59-62.
40.
Oakland, T., & Rossen, E. (2005). A 21st-century model for identifying students for gifted and talented programs in light of national conditions: An emphasis on race and ethnicity. Gifted Child Today, 28, 56-63.
41.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S.Y., Ngoi, M., & Ngoi, D. (2004). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and non-minority children by increasing access to gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 127-158.
42.
Patton, J.M. (1997). Disproportionate representation in gifted programs: Best practices for meeting the challenge. In A. J. Artiles, & G. Zomora-Duran (Eds.), Reducing disproportionate representation of culturally diverse students in special and gifted education (pp. 59-81). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
43.
Peterson, J.S. (1999). Gifted through whose cultural lens? An application of the postpositivisitc mode of inquiry. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 354-383.
44.
Reis, S.M., & McCoach, D.B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152-170.
45.
Reis, S.M., & Small, M. (2005). The varied and unique characteristics exhibited by diverse gifted and talented learners. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 3-32). Waco, TX: Prufrock.
46.
Renzulli, J.S. (1977). Interest-a-lyzer. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
47.
Renzulli, J.S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
48.
Renzulli, J.S., Leppien, J., & Hayes, T. (2000). The multiple menu model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
49.
Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
50.
Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
51.
Rhodes, L. (1992). Focusing attention on the individual in identification of gifted Black students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 108-110.
52.
Rios, F., & Montecinos, C. (1999). Advocating social justice and cultural affirmation: Ethnically diverse pre-service teacher perspectives on multicultural education. Equity and Excellence in Education , 32(3), 66-75.
53.
Seidl, B., & Friend, G. (2002). Learning authority at the door: Equal-status community-based experiences and the preparation of teachers for diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(4), 421-433.
54.
Sleeter, C.E. (1990). Staff development for desegregated schooling. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(1), 33-40.
55.
Slocumb, P.D., & Payne, R.K. (2000). Removing the mask: Giftedness in poverty. Highlands, TX: aha! Process.
56.
Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58.
Tomlinson, C.A., Ford, D.Y., Reis, S.M., Briggs, C.J., & Strickland, C.A. (2004). In search of the dream: Designing schools and classrooms that work for high potential students from diverse cultural backgrounds. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children, and Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
59.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence report: A case for developing Americas talent (Report No. PIP-93-1201). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED359743)
60.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Kulieke, M. (1994). A study of self-concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students. Roeper Review, 16, 186-191.
61.
Wright, L., & Borland, J.H. (1992). A special friend: Adolescent mentors for young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 124-129.
62.
Yin, R. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Zamora-Duran, G., & Artiles, A.J. (1997). Disproportionate representation: Current issues and future directions. In A. J. Artiles & G. Zamora-Duran (Eds.), Reducing disproportionate representation of culturally diverse students in special and gifted education (pp. 87-93). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
64.
Zorman, R. (1991). Identification and nurturance of young disadvantaged gifted children. In R. M. Milgram (Ed.), Counseling gifted and talented children: A guide for teachers, counselors, and parents. (pp. 161-178). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
