Parental Narratives of Underachievement Among Gifted Children: Onset,Factors,and Perceived Resolutions

Abstract

This study explored parents’ perceptions surrounding the onset and development of underachievement among their gifted children. The study employed a qualitative narrative inquiry design with 12 parent participants discussing the underachievement of their 10 (four girls, six boys) children between the ages of 12 and 16. These families lived in the Midwestern United States. Participants described a similar developmental trajectory of their child’s underachievement, beginning with early academic promise, but a critical turning point often occurs in late elementary or middle school. Internal factors such as motivation, self-regulation skills, and mental health were viewed as important contributing elements. External influences such as family dynamics, school environment, student–teacher relationships, and peer relationships also played a significant role. The interplay of these multiple factors highlights the perceived complexity of underachievement among gifted children.

Keywords

narrative inquiry qualitative research underachievement gifted and talented parent perceptions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almukhambetova

Hernández-Torrano

(2020). Gifted students’ adjustment and underachievement in university: An exploration from the Self-Determination Theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220905525

Bogdan

R. C.

Biklen

S. K.

(2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th Ed.). Pearson.

Bruner

(1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.

Clandinin

D. J.

(2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research Studies in Music Education, 27(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X060270010301

Dai

D. Y.

Moon

S. M.

Feldhusen

J. F.

(1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2–3), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653290

Davis

J. L.

(2014). Families and gifted learners: Developing talent and advocating for their own. In Gifted education: Current perspectives and issues, Advances in special education (Vol. 26, pp. 223–237). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-4013(2014)0000026011

Desmet

O. A.

Pereira

(2022). Gifted boys’ perceptions of their academic underachievement. Gifted Education International, 38(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211050294

Desmet

O. A.

Pereira

Peterson

J. S.

(2020). Telling a tale: How underachievement develops in gifted girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219888633

Dweck

C. S.

(2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

10.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2024). The development, testing, and refinement of Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues’ situated expectancy-value model of achievement performance and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09888-9

11.

Ford

D. Y.

(1995). A study of achievement and underachievement among gifted, potentially gifted, and average African-American students. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.

12.

Ford

D. Y.

Thomas

(1997). Underachievement among gifted minority students: Problems and promises (ED409660). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED409660.pdf

13.

Gilar-Corbi

Veas

Miñano

Castejón

J. L.

(2019). Differences in personal, familial, social, and school factors between underachieving and non-underachieving gifted secondary students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02367

14.

Gillespie

Richardson

(2011). Exchanging social positions: Enhancing perspective taking within a cooperative problem solving task. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 608–616.

15.

Hall

W. A.

Long

Bermback

Jordan

Patterson

(2005). Qualitative teamwork issues and strategies: Coordination through mutual adjustment. Qualitative Health Research, 15(3), 394–410.

16.

Hébert

T. P.

(2020). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.

17.

Howard

T. C.

Reynolds

(2008). Examining parent involvement in reversing the underachievement of African American students in middle-class schools. Educational Foundations, 22, 79–98. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ839499.pdf

18.

Jeon

K.-W.

Feldhunsen

J. F.

(1993). Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of social-psychological factors of underachievement among the gifted in Korea and the United States. Gifted Education International, 9(2), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949300900212

19.

Jolly

J. L.

Matthews

M. S.

(2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451703

20.

Kanevsky

Keighley

(2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235

21.

Lavrijsen

Ramos

Verschueren

(2022). Detecting unfulfilled potential: Perceptions of underachievement by student, parents, and teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(4), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1852523

22.

Lee

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2006). Comparisons between talent search students qualifying via scores on standardized tests and via parent nomination. Roeper Review, 28(3), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554355

23.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

24.

Mammadov

Ward

T. J.

Cross

J. R.

Cross

T. L.

(2016). Use of latent profile analysis in studies of gifted students. Roeper Review, 38(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1183739

25.

Matthews

M. S.

Jolly

J. L.

(2022). The learning environment at home: Parents and families. In Roberts

J. L.

Inman

T. F.

Robins

J. H.

(Eds.), Introduction to gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 183–198). Routledge.

26.

Matthews

M. S.

McBee

M. T.

(2007). School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207299473

27.

McCall

R. B.

Evahn

Kratzer

(1992). High school underachievers: What do they achieve as adults? Sage.

28.

McCoach

D. B.

Siegle

(2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700205

29.

Mofield

Parker Peters

(2019). Understanding underachievement: Mindset, perfectionism, and achievement attitudes among gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219836737

30.

Obergriesser

Stoeger

(2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26, 167–190.

31.

Papadopoulos

(2021). Parenting the exceptional social-emotional needs of gifted and talented children: What do we know? Children, 8(11), 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110953

32.

Peterson

J. S.

(1998). The burdens of capability. Reclaiming Children and Youth: Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 6(4), 194–198.

33.

Peterson

J. S.

(2000). A follow-up study of one group of achievers and underachievers four years after high school graduation. Roeper Review, 22(4), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554041

34.

Peterson

J. S.

(2001). Successful adults who were once adolescent underachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(4), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500402

35.

Peterson

J. S.

Colangelo

(1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling & Development, 57(4), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01886.x

36.

Pfeiffer

S. I.

Stocking

V. B.

(2000). Vulnerabilities of academically gifted students. Special Services in the Schools, 16(1–2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v16n01_06

37.

Preckel

Brunner

(2015). Academic self-concept, achievement goals, and achievement: Is their relation the same for academic achievers and underachievers? Gifted and Talented International, 30(1–2), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137458

38.

Ramos

Lavrijsen

Linnenbrink-Garcia

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Sypré

Boncquet

Verschueren

(2023). Motivational pathways underlying gifted underachievement: Trajectory classes, longitudinal outcomes, and predicting factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221132279

39.

Reichenberg

Landau

(2009). Families of gifted children. In Shavinina

L. V.

(Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 873–883). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_43

40.

Reis

S. M.

McCoach

D. B.

(2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302

41.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2009). Myth 1: The gifted and talented constitute one single homogeneous group and giftedness is a way of being that stays in the person over time and experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346824

42.

Renati

Bonfiglio

N. S.

Dilda

Mascia

M. L.

Penna

M. P.

(2022). Gifted children through the eyes of their parents: Talents, social-emotional challenges, and educational strategies from preschool through middle school. Children (Basel, Switzerland), 10(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010042

43.

Renzulli

J. S.

Reis

S. M.

(2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development. Routledge.

44.

Rimm

S. B.

(2008). Why bright kids get poor grades—And what you can do about it. Great Potential Press.

45.

Ritchotte

J. A.

Matthews

M. S.

Flowers

C. P.

(2014). The validity of the achievement-orientation model for gifted middle school students: An exploratory study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534890

46.

Rothenbusch

Voss

Golle

Zettler

(2018). Linking teacher and parent ratings of teacher-nominated gifted elementary school students to each other and to school grades. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752100

47.

Roulston

(2014). Analysing interviews. In Flick

(Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 297–312). Sage.

48.

Rubenstein

L. D.

Siegle

Reis

S. M.

Mccoach

D. B.

Burton

M. G.

(2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620

49.

Seidman

(2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

50.

Siegle

(2013). The underachieving gifted child: Recognizing, understanding, and reversing underachievement. Prufrock Press.

51.

Siegle

(2018). Understanding underachievement. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

(Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 285–297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_16

52.

Siegle

(2022). Understanding underachievement. In Roberts

J. L.

Inman

T. F.

Robins

J. H.

(Eds.), Introduction to gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 301–322). Routledge.

53.

Siegle

DaVia Rubenstein

McCoach

D. B.

(2020). Do you know what I’m thinking? A comparison of teacher and parent perspectives of underachieving gifted students’ attitudes. Psychology in Schools, 57(10), 1596–1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22345

54.

Siegle

McCoach

D. B.

Roberts

(2017). Why I believe I achieve determines whether I achieve. High Ability Studies, 28, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1302873

55.

Snyder

K. E.

Carrig

M. M.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2019). Developmental pathways in underachievement. Applied Developmental Science, 25(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1543028

56.

Snyder

K. E.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.835597

57.

Stoeger

Steinbach

Obergriesser

Matthes

(2014). What is more important for fourth-grade primary school students for transforming their potential into achievement: The individual or the environmental box in multidimensional conceptions of giftedness? High Ability Studies, 24, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.914381

58.

Stoeger

Ziegler

(2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 261–271.

59.

Tufford

Newman

(2012). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 80–96.

60.

Urdan

Midgley

(2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009061303214

61.

Wai

Rindermann

(2017). What goes into high educational and occupational achievement? Education, brains, hard work, networks, and other factors. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1302874

62.

White

I. J.

Graham

L. J.

Blaas

(2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.001

63.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

64.

Ziv

Rimon

Doni

(1977). Parental perception and self-concept of gifted and average underachievers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44(2), 563–568. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.563

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB