Bem, S.L.On the utility of alternate procedures for assessing psychological androgyny . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 1977, 45, 196-205.
2.
Casserly, P.L.Helping young women take math and science seriously in school. In N. Colangelo, & R. T. Zaffron (Eds.), New uoices in counseling the gifted , 1979, 346-369.
3.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. Sexrelated differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 1977, 14, 51-71.
4.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J.Sex related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 1978, 9, 189-203.
5.
Fleming, E.S., & Hollinger, C.L.Realizing the promise of female adolescents: A diagnostic-prescriptive model. Resources in Education. (ED 179 902), 1979.
6.
Fox, L.H.Sex differences: Implications for program planning for the academically gifted . In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty year perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.
7.
Helmreich, R.L., & Spence, J.T.The work and family orientation questionnaire: An objective measure to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology , 1978, 4.
8.
Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J.Short form of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI), an objective measure of self esteem. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 1974, 4, 473-475.
9.
Horner, M.S.Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women . Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 157-175.
10.
Horner, M.S.Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive and noncompetitive situations. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan.) Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1968, No. 69-12-135.
11.
Keating, D. P. (Ed.) Intellectual talent: Research and development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.
12.
Lavach, J.F., & Lanier, H.B.The motive to avoid success in 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th grade high-achieving girls. The Journal of Educational Research, 1975, 68, 216-218.
13.
Mariand, S.P.Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
14.
Meece, J.L., Parsons, J.E., Kaczala, C.M., Goff, S.B., & Futterman, R.Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice . Psychological Bulletin,1982, 91, 324-348.
15.
Parsons, J.E., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., & Midgley, C.General model of academic choice. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Perspectives on achievement and achievement motivation. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1983.
16.
Rodenstein, J., Pfleger, L., & Colangelo, N.Career development needs of the gifted: Special considerations for gifted women. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1977 , 20, 340-347.
17.
Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1978.
18.
Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J.Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relationship to self esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29-39.
19.
Theodore, A.The professional woman. Cambridge, MA: Shenkman, 1971. Torrance, E.P.Changing reactions of preadolescent girls to tasks requiring creative scientific thinking. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1963, 102, 217-223.
20.
Tosi, L.Woman's scientific creativity. Impact of Science on Society , 1975, 25, 104-114.
21.
Tresemer, D.W.The cumulative record of research on "fear of success." Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 1976, 2, 217-236.
22.
Whitley, B.E.Sex role orientation and self esteem: A critical meta-analytic review . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 765-778.