Each of 434 German and 446 American high school teachers nominated one student as highly gifted. The teachers aaught native language, mathematics/physics, music/art, or modern foreign language. All estimated what percentage of their students were highly gifted and rated their nominess on 84 characteristics. The percentage of students estimated to be highly gifted was higher for Americans. The characteristics were factor analyzed separately in the two samples and yielded three common factors. A three way MANOVA using these factors as dependent variables found that American students were described as more popular and more achievement-oriented than their German counterparts; Germans were described as slightly more self-centered than the Americans; boys were perceived as more setf-centered than girls.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arndt, C.O. (1961). Ideas from the German Gymnasium. In S. Everett (Ed.), Programs for the gifted (pp. 69-86). New York: Harper and Brothers.
2.
Burt, C. (1975). The gifted child. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
3.
Cattell, R.B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum .
4.
Cox, R.L. (1977). Background characteristics of 456 gifted students . Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 261-267.
5.
Dahme, G. (1981). Naturwissenschaftlich hochbegabte Jugendliche— Ergebnisse empirischer Studien an Teilnehmern des Wissinschaftswettbewerbs "Jugend forscht." In W. Wieczerkowski and H. Wagner (Ed.), Das hochbegabte Kind (pp. 156-170). Düsseldorf, West Germany: Padagogischer Verlag Schwann.
6.
Frierson, E.C. (1965). Upper and lower status gifted children: A study of differences. Exceptional Children, 32, 83-90.
7.
Gallagher, J.J. (1979). Issues in education for the gifted. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development. The 78th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 28-44). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Gallagher, J.J., Aschner, M.J., & Jenné, W. (1967). Productive thinking of gifted children in classroom interaction. Council for Exceptional Children Research Monograph Series B, Number B-5. Washington, D.C.: Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 026 758).
9.
Getzels, J.W., & Jackson, P.W. (1962). Creatiuity and intelligence. New York: Wiley.
10.
Gowan, J.C. (1975). Identification—Responsibility of both principal and teacher. In W. B. Barbe & J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted (pp. 280-281). Second edition, New York: Irvington.
11.
Gowan, J.C., & Demos, G.D. (1964). The education and guidance of the ablest. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
12.
Heinbokel, A. (1980, September). Report from West Germany. World Gifted: Newsletter of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children , 1(2), 3.
13.
Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Knopf.
14.
Hollingworth, L.S. (1942). Children above 180 I.Q. Yonkers-on-Hudson, New York.
15.
Kincaid, D. (1969). A study of highly gifted elementary pupils. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 264-267.
16.
Laycock, F. (1979). Gifted children. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
17.
Lederer, G. (1981). Trends in authoritarianism: An attitudinal study of adolescents in two cultures (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 420A. (University Microfilms No. 8113525).
18.
Lederer, G. (1983). Jugend und Authorität. Opladen, Federal Republic of Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
19.
Martinson, R.A. (1975). The identification of the gifted and talented . Reston, Virginia: Council for Exceptional Children.
20.
Merelman, R.M. and Foster, C.R. (1978). Political culture and education in advanced industrial societies: West Germany and the United States. International Review of Education, 24, 443-465.
21.
Mönks, F.J. (1981). Entwicklungspsychologische Aspekte der Hochbegabtenforschung . In W. Wieczerkowski and H. Wagner (Eds.), Das hochbegabte Kind (pp. 38-51). Düsseldorf: Padagogischer Verlag Schwann .
22.
Pines, M. (1981, May). Unlearning blind obedience in German schools . Psychology Today, 15, 59-60.
23.
Renzulli, J.S. (1978). What makes giftedness?Phi Delta Kappan,60, 180-184.
24.
Renzulli, J.S., Hartman, R.K., & Callahan, C.M. (1975). Scale for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. In W. B. Barbe & J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted (pp. 264-273). Second edition, New York: Irvington.
25.
Sanderlin, O. with Lundy, R.R. (1979). Gifted children. South Brunswick, N.J.: A. S. Barnes.
26.
Schmidt, L.G. (1960). Problems of superior and talented students. In B. Schertzer (Ed.), Working with superior students (pp. 172-178). Chicago: Science Research Associates.
27.
Shaver, J.P., Hofmann, H.P., & Richards, H.E. (1971). The authoritarianism of American and German teacher education students. Journal of Social Psychology, 84, 303-304.
28.
Tausch, A.M. (1966). Merkmale des Erziehungsverhaltens deutscher und amerikanischer Lehrer. Koiner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie,18, 516-531.
29.
Terman, L.M. et al. (1925). Genetic studies of genius, Vol. I, Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, Califomia: Stanford University Press.
Walberg, H.J. (1971). Varieties of adolescent creativity and the high school environment. Exceptional Children, 38, 111-116.
34.
Walberg, H.J., Rasher, S.P. & Parkerson, J. (1979). Childhood and eminence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13, 225-231.
35.
Wallach, M.A., & Wing, C.W. (1969). The talented student. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
36.
Witty, P. (1940). A genetic study of fifty gifted children. In G. D. Stoddard (Chairman), Intelligence: Its nature and nurture (pp. 401-409). Thirty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Co.
