Is high academic aptitude an asset or a liability to psychosocial adjustment among gifted program students? This brief report examined contrasting hypotheses that the relation between academic aptitude and psychosocial adjustment is positive, negative, or curvilinear for high ability students. Robustness of study findings was examined in three diverse groups of gifted program students: 1) 151 second grade students participating in public school gifted programs; 2) 264 5th to 11th grade students attending a university summer enrichment program; and 3) 60 adolescent females enrolled in an early college entrance program. Psychosocial adjustment was assessed by measures of academic, social, and general self-concept in all three groups, with additional adjustment measures specific to each group. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses provided little evidence for a relation between aptitude scores and adjustment within this restricted range.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T.M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
2.
Achenbach, T.M., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and the Revised Child Behavior Prpfile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
3.
Achenbach, T.M., & Edelbrock, C. (1986). Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and Teacher Version of the Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
4.
Brody, L.E., & Benbow, C.P. (1986). Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 15, 1-18.
5.
Caravajal, H., & McKnab, P. (1990). Relationships between scores of gifted children on Stanford-Binet IV and the SRA Educational Ability Series. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 80-82.
6.
Coopersmith, S., & Gilberts, R. (1982). Professional manual for the Behavioral Academic Self-Esteem Scale. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
7.
Cornell, D.G., Callahan, C.M., & Loyd, B. (1991). Socioemotional adjustment of adolescent girls enrolled in a residential acceleration program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 58-66.
8.
Cornell, D.G., Delcourt, M.A.B., Goldberg, M., & Bland, L. (1992). Characteristics of elementary students entering gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 309-331.
9.
Cornell, D.G., Pelton, G.M., Bassin, L.E., Landrum, L., Ramsav, S.G., Cooley, M.R., Lynch, K.A., & Hamrick, E. (1990). Self-concept and peer status among gifted program youth. Journal of Educational Psych, 82, 456-463.
10.
Dauber, S.L., & Benbow, C.P. (1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34 (1), 10-15.
11.
Gardner; H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basic Books.
Grossberg, I.N., & Cornell, D.G. (1988). Relationship between personality adjustment and high intelligence: Terman versus Hollingworth. Exceptional Children, 55, 266-272.
14.
Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children . Denver, CO: University of Denver .
15.
Hollingworth, L.S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ, Stanford Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers, New York: World Book.
16.
Janos, P. (1983). The psychosocial adjustment of children of very superior intellectual ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University.
17.
Leaverton, I., & Herzog, S. (1979). Adjustment of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 149-152.
18.
Livesay, K.K., & Mealor, D.J. (1984). Errors of overinclusion versus errors of underincludion in gifted screening. Journal of Psvchoeducational Assessment , 2, 177-182.
19.
Nichols, R.C., & Schnell, R.R. (1963). Factor scales for the California Personality Inventory . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 228-235.
20.
Otis, A.S., & Lennon, R.T. ( 1989). Otis-Lennon school ability test, (6th Ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
21.
Pedhazur; E.J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
22.
Reynolds, C.R., & Richrnond, B.O. (1985). The revised children's manifest anxiety scale . Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
23.
Sapp, G.L., & Marshall, J. (1984). The Otis-Lennon Ability Test: A study of validity . Psychological Reports, 55, 539-544.
24.
Sattler, J.M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Author. Shore, B., Cornell, D., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers Colleye Press.
25.
Terman, L.M. & Oden, M.H. (1947). The gifted child grows up: Twenty-five year's follow-up of a superior group. Genetic studies of genius. Vol 4. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
Wright, D., & Piersel. W.C. (1987). Usefulness of a group-administered ability test for decision making. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 63.71.
