Informed consent - who knows? Results of a hospital audit project

Abstract

Increasingly patients are seeking more information about medical procedures and their risks, and as a profession we must act on this. Despite recent guidance from the Department of Health and British Medical Association (BMA), obtaining consent for surgical procedures is still thought to be sub-optimal. An audit of the consent procedure at a District General Hospital is presented here. The aim is to establish who is obtaining the consent of the patient and what is being said to the patient prior to them consenting. The results show that in most cases it is the House Surgeon taking the consent. The discussion that takes place with the patient about their procedure does not reach a standard that is set by the Consultants within the same hospital. Based on this audit the author proposes additional measures designed to achieve a higher standard of informed consent and a more consistent approach to it.

Keywords

informed consent audit truth disclosure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schloendorff v New York Hospital, 211 NY 125 (1914).

Salgo v Leland Stanford Jr, University Board of Trustees, 317 P2d 170 (Calif Ct Appeals 1957).

The Association of Community Health Councils for England and Wales. The Patients' Charter: Guidelines for good practice . London, 1986.

Wolf A. , Schoring JB Does informed consent alter elderly patients' preferences for colorectal cancer screening? J Gen Intern Med 2000: 15: 24-30.

Dept of Health NHS Executive. A guide to consent for examination or treatment. HC(90) 22. London, 1990.

Gilberthorpe J. Consent to treatment. London: The Medical Defence Union, November 1997.

The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland. The Surgeon's Duty of Care: Guidance for Surgeons on Ethical and Legal Issues , October 1997.

The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Good Surgical Practice, November 2000.

Seeking patients' consent: The ethical considerations. General Medical Council, February 1999.

10.

Finklestein D. , Smith MK , Faden R. Informed consent and medical ethics. Arch Opthalmol 1993: 111: 324-326.

11.

Informed Consent. The Ethics Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996: 115(3): 178-185.

12.

Bell GD , McCloy RF , Charlton JE , Campbell D. , Dent NA , Gear Mwl , Logan Rfa. Recommendations for standards of sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 1991: 32: 823-827.

13.

Mulcahy D. , Cunningham K. , McCormack D. , Cassidy N. , Walsh M. Informed consent from whom? J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997: 42: 161-164.

14.

Soin B. , Thomson H. , Smellie Wab. Informed consent: a case for more education of the surgical team. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993: 75: 62-65.

15.

Richardson N. , Jones P. , Thomas M. Should HOs obtain consent for operations and anaesthesia? Health Trends 1996: 28: 56-59.

16.

Smith R. All changed, changed utterly. BMJ 1998: 316: 1917-1918.

17.

Orr Cjb. How to minimise litigation. Br J Hosp Med 1989: 42: 439.

18.

Green S. Editorial. J Med Def Union 1996: 12: 49.

19.

Osuna E. , Perez-Carceles MD , Perez-Moreno JA , Luna A. Informed consent. Evaluation of the information provided to patients before anaesthesia and surgery. Med Law 1998: 17: 511-518.

20.

Richards J. , McDonald P. Doctor-patient communication in surgery. JR Soc Med 1982: 78: 922-924.

21.

Armstrong AP , Cole AA , Page RE Informed consent: are we doing enough? Br J Plastic Surg 1997: 50: 637-640.

22.

Stanley BM , Walters DJ , Maddern GJ Informed consent: how much information is enough? Aust NZ J Surg 1998: 68: 788-791.

23.

West JC Informed consent. J Health Risk Management 1998: 55-58.

24.

Guidelines for informed consent for endoscopic procedures . British Society of Gastroenterology, 1999 .

25.

Mazur DJ , Merz JF Patients' interpretations of verbal expressions of probability; Implications for securing informed consent to medical interventions. Behav Sci Law 1994: 12: 417-426.

26.

Singh AD , Paling J. Informed consent; putting risks into perspective. Surv Opthalmol 1997: 42: 83-86.

27.

Kirk RM , Mansfield A0 , Cochrane JPS (Eds). Clinical Surgery in General. London: Churchill-Livingstone, 1999.

28.

Cassileth BR , Zupkis RV , Sutton-Smith K. , March V. Informed consent - why are its goals imperfectly realized? N Engl J Med 1980: 302: 896-900.

29.

Neale G. Reading risks in gastroenterological practice. Gut 1998: 42: 139-142.