The impact of additional weekdays of active commuting to school on children achieving a criterion of 300+ minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2011
The impact of additional weekdays of active commuting to school on children achieving a criterion of 300+ minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Objective: To investigate the value of additional days of active commuting for meeting a criterion of 300+ minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA; 60+ mins/day x 5) during the school week.
Methods: Based on seven-day diaries supported by teachers, binary logistic regression analyses were used to predict achievement of MVPA criteria according to days of active commuting to and from school. MVPA was recorded across five time points: (a) before school, (b) walking/cycling to and from school, (c) during school, (d) in school-based clubs and (e) during leisure time. The study was conducted in Derby, UK, in June 2006.
Results: Active commuting was reported by 4218 (78 per cent of 5422) children for an average daily commuting time of 18.4 ± 16.4 minutes. Children who commuted on more days in the week were most likely to achieve the MVPA criterion. Every day of active commuting doubled the chances of meeting the MVPA criterion; in Year 10 girls this effect was stronger (odds ratio 6.45).
Conclusion: Results confirm the ubiquity of active commuting among young people. Even one additional day of active commuting helps to meet established criteria. In older girls active commuting is uniquely powerful in contributing to attainment of public health targets of MVPA.
NessARLearySDMattocksC. Objectively measured physical activity and fat mass in a large cohort of children. PLOS Medicine, 2007: 4(3): 476–484.
2.
The NHS Information Centre, Lifestyle Statistics. Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet. London: Department of Health, 2009.
3.
RiddochCJMattocksCDeereK. Objective measurement of levels and patterns of physical activity. Archives of Disease In Childhood, 2007: 92: 963–969.
4.
TrostSGPateRRSallisJF. Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2002: 34(2): 350–355.
5.
MeromDTudor-LockeCBaumanARisselC. Active commuting to school among NSW primary school children: implications for public health. Health and Place, 2006: 12: 678–687.
6.
NelsonNHFoleyEO’GormanDJMoynaNMWoodsCB. Active commuting to school: how far is too far?International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2008: 5: 1.
7.
Office for National Statistics. Chapter 12: Transport. In: Social trends. 40th ed.Hampshire: Macmillan, 2009.
8.
AlexanderLMInchleyJTCurrieDCooperARCurrieC. The broader impact of walking to schoolamong adolescents: seven day accelerometery based study. British Medical Journal, 2005: 331: 1061–1062.
9.
CooperARPageASFosterLJQahwajiD. Commuting to school: are children who walk more physically active?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2003: 25(4): 273–276.
10.
CooperARBo AndersonLWedderkoppNPageASFrobergK. Physical activity levels of children who walk, cycle, or are driven to school. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005: 29: 179–184.
11.
HohepaMSchofieldGKoltGSScraggRGarrettN. Pedomoeter-determined physical activity levels of adolescents: differences by age, sex, time of week, and transportation mode to school. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 2008: 5(1): S140–S152.
12.
DollmanJLewisNR. Active transport to school as part of a broader habit of walking and cycling among South Australian youth. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2007: 19: 436–443.
13.
SirardJRRinerJRMcIverKLPateRP. Physical activity and active commuting to elementary school. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2005: 37(12): 2062–2069.
14.
Tudor-LockeCLeeSMMorganABeighleAPangraziRP. Children’s pedometer-determined physical activity during the segmented school day. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2006: 38(10): 1732–1738.
15.
PageASCooperARMcKennaJFosterLRiddochCJFoxKR. Development of a survey instrument to measure physical activity among young people aged 5–16: summary report for phases 1 and 2, for Health Education Authority. London: Health Education Authority, 1999.
16.
PageASCooperARMcKennaJFosterLJRiddochCJFoxKR. Development of a research tool to measure physical activity among young people aged 5–16 in the UK. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2000: 4: 267–268.
17.
McKennaJFosterLPageA. Exploring recall of physical activity in young people using qualitative interviewing. Pediatric Exercise Science, 2004: 6(1): 5–14.
18.
Tudor-LockeCNeffLJAinsworthBEAddyCLPopkinBM. Omission of active commuting to school and the prevalence of children’s health-related physical activity levels: the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 2002: 28(6): 507–512.
19.
BrownWJBurtonNWRowanPJ. Updating the evidence on physical activity and health in women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007: 33(5): 404–411.
20.
SleapMWarburtonP. Are primary school children gaining heart and health benefits from their journey to school?Child: Care, Health and Development, 2002: 19(2): 99–108.
