The influence of parent–adolescent relationship quality,parental monitoring,and peer substance use on substance use in South Korean high school students: Using latent growth curve modelling
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2012
The influence of parent–adolescent relationship quality,parental monitoring,and peer substance use on substance use in South Korean high school students: Using latent growth curve modelling
Objective: Substance use, such as alcohol and tobacco, is becoming a critical problem in the area of health promotion and preventive programme. Furthermore, the onset of alcohol use has been becoming increasingly earlier. This study examined developmental trajectories of substance use among high school students in South Korea and effects of peer substance on such trajectories, and also examined the moderating effects of parent–adolescent relationship quality and parental monitoring in the link between peer substance use and adolescents’ own substance use.
Methods: This study used the Korea Youth Panel Survey (KYPS), a nationally-representative sample of 3,125 high school students. The participants were in the 10th grade when first recruited and assessed annually from 2005 to 2007. A latent growth curve model was used for the analysis
Results: Substance use in Korean high school students increased over time. Peer substance use was associated more strongly with the initial level of adolescent substance uses than parenting. Parent–adolescent relationship quality moderated the association between peer and adolescent substance use.
Conclusion: The effect of peer substance use was most strongly associated with the initial level and growth of adolescents’ own substance use.
Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. Survey of the youth harmful environment (11-1351000-000244-10). Seoul: Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, 2008.
3.
BranstetterSAFurmanWCotterllL. The influence of representations of attachment, maternal-adolescent relationship quality, and maternal monitoring on adolescent substance use: A 2-year longitudinal examination. Child Dev, 2009; 80(5): 1448–1462.
4.
DishionTJCapaldiDSpracklenKMLiF. Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Developmental Psychopathol, 1995; 7: 803–824.
5.
EitleD. The moderating effects of peer substance use on the family structure-adolescent substance use association: Quantity versus quality of parenting. Addictive Behav, 2005; 30: 963–980.
6.
EnnettSTBaumanKEHussongAFarisRFosheeVACaiL. The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. J Res on adolescence, 2006; 16(2): 159–186.
7.
HussongAM. Differentiating peer contexts and risk for adolescent substance use. J Youth and Adolescence, 2002; 31(3): 207–220.
8.
LundborgP. Having the wrong friends? Peer effects in adolescent substance use. J Health Economics, 2006; 25: 214–233.
9.
Simons-MortonB. Social influences on adolescent substance use. Am J Health Behav, 2007; 31(6): 672–684.
10.
WangJSimons-MortonBJFarhartTLukJW. Socio-demographic variablity in adolescent substance use: Mediation by parents and peers. Prev Sc, 2009; 10: 387–396.
11.
WillsTASandyJMYaegerAMClearySDShinarO. Coping dimensions, life stress, and adolescent substance use: A latent growth analysis. J Abnorm Psychol, 2001; 110(2): 309–323.
12.
WillsTASandyJMYaegerAShinarO. Family risk factors and adolescent substance use: Moderation effects for temperament dimensions. Developmental Psychol, 2001; 37(3): 283–297.
13.
JaccardJBlantonHDodgeT. Peer influences on risk behavior: an analysis of the effects of a close friend. Developmental Psychol, 2005; 41(1): 135–147.
14.
ColeyRLVotruba-DrzalESchindlerHS. Trajectories of parenting processes and adolescent substance use: Reciprocal effects. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2008; 36: 613–625.
15.
MasonWA. Self-esteem and delinquency revisited (Again): A test of Kaplan’s self-derogation theory of delinquency using latent growth curve modeling, J Youth and Adolesc, 2001; 30(1): 83–102
16.
National Youth Policy Institute. Korea youth panel study. Online. Available: http://archive.nypi.re.kr/ (updated 28 December 2009; accessed 2 March 2010).
17.
LeeJL. Trajectories of change in internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescence: Latent growth curve modeling. J Kor Home Manage Assoc, 2008a; 26(5): 51–60.
18.
LeeJL. Trajectories of change in internalizing and externalizing problems in elementary school students: Latent growth curve modeling. Kor Child and Rights, 2008b; 12(4): 503–523.
19.
MarshalMPFriedmanMSStallRThompsonAL. Individual trajectories of substance use in lesbian, gay and bisexual youth and heterosexual youth. Addic, 2009; 104: 974–981.
20.
BaeJChoiS. Prevalence of substance abuse among Korean adolescents. J Kor Acad of Psychiatr and Ment Health Nurs, 2009; 18(1): 21–30.
21.
LeeSG. Parallel process latent growth modeling of parent influences on delinquent behaviors in adolescence. Kor J Fam Soc Work, 2009; 27: 243–266.
22.
SonBS. A study on the actual state and countermeasure of teenagers’ drug addiction: Around boys’ and girls’ high school in Chon-Ju City. Kor Assoc of Police Sci, 2001; 3: 123–149.
23.
AmoatengAYBarberBKEricksonLD. Family predictors of adolescent substance use: The case of high school students in the Cape Metropolitan Area, Cape Town, South Africa. J Child and Adolesc Ment Health, 2006; 18(1): 7–15.
24.
ClevelandMJFeinbergMEGreenbergMT. Protective families in high-and low risk environments: Implications for adolescent substance use. J Youth Adolescence, 2010; 39: 114–126.
25.
KimEKwakDHYunM. Investigating the effects of peer association and parental influence on adolescent substance use: A study of adolescents in South Korea. J Criminal Justice, 2010; 38: 17–24.
26.
MayberryMLEspelageDLKoeningB. Multilevel modeling of direct effects and interactions of peers, parents, school, and community influences on adolescent substance use. J Youth Adolescence, 2009; 38: 1038–1049.
27.
PikoBFKovacsE. Do parents and school matter? Protective factors for adolescent substance use. Addictive Behav, 2010; 35: 53–56.
28.
StattinHKerrM. Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Dev, 2000; 71(4): 1072–1085.
29.
WillsTAYaegerAM. Family factors and adolescent substance use: Models and mechanisms. Curr Dir in Psychological Sci, 2003; 12(6): 222–226.
30.
ParkYSKimU. The formation and change of adolescents’ delinquent behavior. Kor J Psychological and Soc Issues, 2003; 9(1): 81–114.
