Traffic light food labelling in schools and beyond

Abstract

Objective:

The present study investigated stakeholders’ reactions to the introduction of a traffic light food classification system in primary and secondary school canteens.

Design:

Interviews and focus groups were conducted with stakeholders approximately 18 months after the introduction of the traffic light system, followed by telephone and web-based surveys.

Setting:

The context of the study was Western Australia, where a comprehensive healthy food policy was recently introduced in government schools.

Method:

Stakeholder groups included parents, principals, teachers, canteen managers, and representatives of parents and citizens committees.

Results:

Participants reported high levels of acceptance of the traffic light system and supported its extension to nutrition education programmes targeting children and parents.

Conclusion:

The results suggest that there is likely to be considerable support for an extension of the traffic light policy to the health curriculum in schools and into other food provision contexts.

Keywords

child obesity nutrition policy schools traffic lights

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Children who are Overweight or Obese. ABS Australian Social Trends. Canberra, Australia: ABS. Cat No. 4102.0, 2009.

Magnusson

. Obesity prevention and personal responsibility: The case of front-of-pack labelling in Australia. BMC Public Health, 2010: 10: 662–73.

Sacks

Swinburn

Lawrence

. Obesity policy action framework and analysis grids for a comprehensive policy approach to reducing obesity. Obesity Reviews, 2009: 10: 76–86.

Mercer

. Obesity, battle of the bulge-policy behind change: Whose responsibility is it and who pays? Health Education Journal, 2010: 20(10): 1–8.

Walton

Waiti

Signal

. Identifying barriers to promoting healthy nutrition in New Zealand primary schools. Health Education Journal, 2010: 69(1): 84–94.

Kelly

Hughes

Chapman

. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market. Health Promotion International, 2009: 24: 120–9.

Sacks

Tikellis

Millar

Swinburn

. Impact of ‘traffic-light’ nutrition information on online food purchases in Australia. Aust NZ J Public Health, 2011: 35(2): 122–6.

White

Thomson

Signal

. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: Where to now? New Zealand Medical Journal, 2010: 123: 12–16.

Cowburn

Stockley

. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 2005: 8: 21–8.

10.

Mhurchu

Gorton

. Nutrition labels and claims in New Zealand and Australia: a review of use and understanding. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2007: 31: 105–12.

11.

Signal

Lanumata

Robinson

. Perceptions of New Zealand nutrition labels by Maōri, Pacific and low-income shoppers. Public Health Nutrition, 2008: 11: 706–13.

12.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2008. Canberra: AIHW. Cat No. AUS 99, 2008.

13.

Lobstein

Davies

. Defining and labelling ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ food. Public Health Nutrition, 2008: 12: 331–40.

14.

Corporate Europe Observatory. A Red Light for Consumer Information. Online. Available: www.corporateeurope.org/system/files/files/article/CEO-Food-Labelling.pdf (accessed 30 December 2010).

15.

Nathan

Develin

Grove

. An Australian childhood obesity summit: The role of data and evidence in ‘public’ policy making. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2005: 2: 1–10.

16.

Pettigrew

Pescud

. What’s not to like? Parents’ views of inappropriate school canteen foods. Paper presented at the Academy of Marketing Conference, Liverpool, UK, 5–7 July, 2011.

17.

Baur

Yang

Austin

. How can we stay healthy when you’re throwing all of this in front of us? Findings from focus groups and interviews in middle schools on environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity. Health Education Behavior, 2004: 31: 34–46.

18.

Borgmeier

Westenhoefer

. Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study. BMC Public Health, 2009: 9: 184–95.

19.

Cullen

Watson

Zakeri

. Exploring changes in middle-school student lunch consumption after local school food service modifications. Public Health Nutrition, 2006: 9: 814–20.

20.

St Leger

. The opportunities and effectiveness of the health promoting primary school in improving child health – a review of the claims and evidence. Health Education Research, 1999: 14: 51–69.