To explore teenagers’ experiences of the breastfeeding promotion and support delivered by health professionals.
Design:
A qualitative study conducted in an English city.
Methods:
Pregnant teenagers and teenage mothers (n = 29) took part in semi-structured interviews and focus groups between March and July 2009.
Results:
Breastfeeding is presented by health professionals as incontrovertibly the best choice of feeding method, but teenagers experience an array of conflicting norms which influence their infant feeding choices and behaviours.
Conclusions:
The social barriers to continuing breastfeeding are insufficiently recognized and addressed by health professionals. It is likely that teenage mothers would breastfeed for longer if they perceived that breastfeeding was a normal way to feed baby in their social milieu.
BollingKGrantCHamlynBThorntonA. Infant Feeding Survey 2005. London: The Stationery Office, 2007.
2.
EU Project on Promotion Of Breastfeeding in Europe. The Protection, Promotion and Support of Breastfeeding in Europe: A Blueprint For Action (Revised). Luxembourg: European Commission, 2008.
3.
Department of Health. The Healthy Child Programme. London: Department of Health, 2009.
4.
Department of Health. Breastfeeding: Off to the Best Start. London: Department of Health, 2007.
5.
World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Infant Feeding. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
6.
ShawMLawlorD. Why we measure teenage pregnancy but do not count teenage mothers. Critical Public Health, 2007: 17(4): 311–16.
7.
GrahamHMcDermottD. Qualitative research and the evidence base of policy: Insights from studies of teenage mothers in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 35(1): 21–37.
8.
Department of Health. Priorities and Planning Framework 2003–2006. London: Department of Health, 2003.
9.
Department of Health/Department for Children, Schools and Families. Teenage Parents Next Steps. Nottingham: DCSF Publications, 2007.
10.
DykesFHall MoranVBurtSEdwardsJ. Adolescent mothers and breastfeeding: Experiences and support needs – an exploratory study. Journal of Human Lactation, 2003: 19(4): 391–401.
11.
WambachKKoehnM. Experiences of infant feeding decision-making among urban economically disadvantaged pregnant adolescents. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2004: 48(4): 361–70.
12.
DysonLGreenJRenfrewMMcMillanBWoolridgeM. Factors influencing the infant feeding decision for socio-economically deprived pregnant teenagers: The moral dimension. Birth, 2010: 37(2): 141–9.
13.
BrownellKHuttonLHartmanJDabrowS. Barriers to breastfeeding among African American adolescent mothers. Clinical Pediatrics, 2002: 41: 669–73.
IngramJJohnsonDCondonL. The effect of baby friendly initiative training on breastfeeding rates and the breastfeeding attitudes, knowledge and self-efficacy of community health-care staff. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 2011: 12(3): 266–75.
The NHS Information Centre. Infant Feeding Survey 2010: Early Results. 2011. Online. Available: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/infantfeeding10 (accessed 31 January 2012).
18.
CondonLTiffanyCSymes BolgarR. Cut out for breastfeeding: Changing attitudes to breastfeeding in public. Community Practitioner, 2010: 83(4): 29–31.
19.
Mahon-DalyPAndrewsG. Liminality and breastfeeding: Women negotiating space and two bodies. Health & Place, 2002: 8: 61–76.
20.
PainRBaileyCMowlG. Infant feeding in north east England: Contested spaces of reproduction. Area, 2007: 33(3): 261–72.
21.
HortaBBahlRMartinesJVictoraG. Evidence on the Long Term Effects of Breastfeeding. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007.
22.
IpSChungMRamanGChewPMagulaNDeVineDTrikalinosTLauJ. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, 153.
23.
QuigleyMKellyYSackerA. Breastfeeding and hospitalization for diarrheal and respiratory infection in the UK millennium cohort study. Pediatrics, 2007: 119: 837–42.
