A controlled evaluation of an intensive,peer- led,schools-based,anti-smoking programme

Abstract

There is increasing interest in health promotion interventions which seek to change behaviour through local cultural diffusion by trained opinion-formers. This study adapted this approach to schools settings. Popular pupils in years 8 and 9 (aged 12 to 14) were recruited for intensive training by specialist staff on how to intervene effectively in everyday situations to promote smoking cessation and prevention of smoking uptake among their peers. Data on smoking behaviour, plus saliva samples for cotinine testing, were collected pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and three months post-intervention in two intervention and two control schools. Most differences in behaviour between intervention and control schools were not statistically significant. However, baseline ex-smokers (11 per cent of the sample and a larger group than baseline regular smokers) were significantly more likely still to be abstinent in the intervention, as opposed to the control, schools. Given the relative paucity of evidence of effective anti-smoking programmes in schools, these results are sufficiently encouraging to justify a full-scale randomised controlled trial evaluation.

Keywords

smoking prevention health promotion behaviour change smoking cessation secondary schools

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nutbeam D. , Macaskill P. , Smith C. , et al. Evaluation of two school smoking programmes under normal class room conditions. British Medical Journal 1993 : 306: 102-7.

Reid D. , McNeill A. , Glynn T. Reducing the prevalence of smoking in youth in Western countries: an international review. Tobacco Control 1995: 4: 266-77.

Reid D. Tobacco control: overview. British Medical Bulletin 1996: 52: 108-20.

Aggleton P. Health Promotion and Young People. London: Health Education Authority, 1996.

Owen L. Bolling K. Tracking Teenage Smoking. London: Health Education Authority, 1995.

Diamond A. , Goddard E. Smoking Among Secondary School Children in 1994. London : HMSO, 1995.

Rogers E. The Diffusion of Innovation (3rd edn). New York: Free Press, 1983.

Kelly J. , Sikkema K. , Winett R. , et al. Outcomes of a randomized field trial of a community-level HIV risk reduction intervention. VIII International Conference on AIDS. Amsterdam, 1992 (abstract TuD 0543).

Kelly J. , Murphy D. , Sikkema K. , et al. Randomised, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention or sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. The Lancet 1997: 350: 1500-1505.

10.

Cooper L. Mid-Glamorgan Peer Education Smoking Project. Pontypridd : Bro Taf Health Authority, 1996 .

11.

Catherine A. Schools' Peer Led Smoking Project: Intervention Report. Cardiff: Social Research Unit, 1997 .

12.

Wiist W. , Snider G. Peer education in friendship cliques: prevention of adolescent smoking. Health Education Research 1991: 101-108.

13.

Robinson M. , Bloor M. , Catherine A. , Frankland J. End-of-Grant Report to Bro Taf Health Authority on the EC-Funded Component of the Schools Peer-Led Smoking Intervention Study. Cardiff : Social Research Unit, 1997.

14.

Frankland J. , Bloor M. Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group materials. In: Barbour R. Kitzinger J (eds), Researching with Focus Groups. London: Sage, 1999.

15.

Jarvis M. Uptake of environmental tobacco smoke. In: O'Neill I , Brunnemann K. Dodet B , Hoffmann D (eds), Environmental Carcinogens: Methods of Analysis and Exposure Measurement. Volume 9 Passive Smoking . Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1987.

16.

Bloor M. , Frankland J. , Parry Langdon N. , et al. Evaluation and Feasibility Study of an Intensive Schools-Based Smoking Intervention Programme: Final Report. Cardiff: Social Research Unit, 1997.

17.

Goddard D. Why children start smoking. Addiction 1992 : 87: 17-25.