Objective: This article describes a new and more repeatable, reproducible, and valid test method for characterizing lumbar support in automotive seating. Background: Lumbar support is important because it affects occupant accommodation and perceptions of seat comfort. Assessing only the lumbar mechanism—particularly in terms of travel—is inadequate because it does not consider the effects of trim and foam. Method: The Society of Automotive Engineers' next-generation H-Point machine and associated loading protocol were used as the basis for the new test. Results: The method was found to satisfy minimum gage repeatability and reproducibility requirements. Validity was demonstrated through a regression model that revealed 93.9% of the variance in subjective ratings of poor uncomfortable lumbar support can be explained by two objective indicators: (1) lumbar support prominence in the full-off position and (2) effective travel. Conclusion: The method can be used to differentiate between seats offering two-way adjustable lumbar support. The best two-way adjustable lumbar seat systems are those that couple little to no lumbar support in the starting or off position (i.e., they are nonintrusive) with a considerable amount of effective or perceptible travel. Application: The automotive industry has long needed a way to address the fact that consumers want more lumbar support than their seats currently supply. This contribution offers a method to objectify an important aspect of automotive seating comfort—namely, lumbar support. This should help human factors professionals produce, but not necessarily guarantee, better consumer ratings.
Adams, M.A., & Hutton, W.C. (1985). The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 67B(4), 625-629.
2.
Akerblom, B. (1948). Standing and sitting posture with special reference to the construction of chairs. Doctoral dissertation, A. B. Nordiska Bokhandeln , Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm , Sweden.
3.
Althoff, I., Brinkmann, P., Frobin, W., Sandover, J., & Burton, K. (1992). An improved method of stature measurement for quantitative determination of spinal loading. Spine, 17(6), 682-693.
4.
Andersson, G.B.J., & Ortengren, R. (1974a). Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting: II. Studies on an office chair. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 6(3), 115-121.
5.
Andersson, G.B.J., & Ortengren, R., (1974b). Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting: III. Studies on a wheelchair. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 6(3), 122-127.
6.
Andersson, G.B.J., Ortengren, R., Nachemson, A., & Elfstrom, G. (1974a). Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting: I. Studies on an experimental chair. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 6(3), 104-114.
7.
Andersson, G.B.J., Ortengren, R., Nachemson, A., & Elfstrom, G. (1974b). Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting: IV. Studies on a car driver's seat. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 6(3), 128-133.
8.
Automotive Industry Action Group. (2003). Measurement systems analysis manual (3rd ed.). Southfield, MI: Author.
9.
Bush, T.R., Gregg, S.J., & Hubbard, R.P. (1999). Measuring and modeling support forces of people to assist in the development of the ASPECT manikin weighting (Tech. Paper No. 1999-01-0961). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
10.
Chaffin, D.B., & Andersson, G.B.J. (1991). Guidelines for seated work . In Occupational biomechanics (2nd ed., pp. 335-375). New York: Wiley .
11.
Chow, W.W., & Odell, E.I. (1978). Deformations and stresses in soft body tissues of a sitting person. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering , 100, 79-87.
12.
Griffin, M.J. (1990). Handbook of human vibration. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Gyi, D.E., Porter, J.M., & Robertson, N.K.B. (1998). Seat pressure measurement technologies: Considerations for their evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 29(2), 85-91.
14.
Hobson, D.A. (1992). Comparative effects of posture on pressure and shear at the body-seat interface. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 29(4), 21-31.
15.
Hosea, T.M., Simons, S.R., Delatizky, J., Wong, M.A., & Hsieh, C.C. (1986). Myoelectric analysis of the paraspinal musculature in relation to automobile driving. Spine, 11(9), 928-936.
16.
J.D. Power and Associates. (1997). 1997 seat quality report. Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
17.
J.D. Power and Associates. (1998). 1998 seat quality report. Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
18.
J.D. Power and Associates. (1999). 1999 seat quality report. Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
19.
J.D. Power and Associates. (2000). 2000 seat quality report . Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
20.
J.D. Power and Associates. (2001). 2001 seat quality report . Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
21.
J.D. Power and Associates. (2002). 2002 seat quality report . Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
22.
J.D. Power and Associates. (2003). 2003 seat quality report . Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
23.
J.D. Power and Associates. (2004). 2004 seat quality report . Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
24.
J.D. Power and Associates. (2005). 2005 seat quality report . Agoura Hills, CA: Author.
25.
Kamijo, K., Tsujimura, H., Obara, H., & Katsumata, M. (1982). Evaluation of seating comfort (Tech. Paper No. 820761). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
26.
Keegan, J.J. (1953). Alterations of the lumbar curve related to posture and seating. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 35A, 589-603.
27.
Kolich, M. (2003). Automobile seat comfort: Occupant preferences vs. anthropometric accommodation. Applied Ergonomics, 34(2), 177-184.
28.
Kolich, M., Essenmacher, S.D., & McEvoy, J.T. (2004). Automotive seating: The effect of foam physical properties on occupied vertical vibration transmissibility . Journal of Sound and Vibration, 281(1/2), 409-416.
29.
Kolich, M., & Taboun, S.M. (2002). Combining psychophysical measures of discomfort and electromyography for the evaluation of a new automotive seating concept . International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics , 8(4), 483-496.
30.
Kolich, M., Taboun, S.M., & Mohamed, A.I., (2001). Electromyographic comparison of two lumbar support mechanisms intended for automotive seating applications. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Journal of Automobile Engineering-Part D, 215, 771-777.
31.
Krebs, M. (2008). J. D. Power study shows quality tide lifts virtually all brands; Porsche takes top spot-again. Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://www.autoobserver.com/2008/06/jdpower-study-shows-quality-tide-lifts-virtually-all-brands-porsche-takes-top-spot---again.html
32.
Manary, M.A., Flannagan, C.A.C., Reed, M.P., & Schneider, L.W. (1999). Human subject testing in support of ASPECT (Tech. Paper No. 1999-01-0960). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
33.
Montmayeur, N., Marca, C., Cabane, C., Dwarampudi, R., Kolich, M., & Nunez, S. (2007, June). Virtual seat comfort assessment through effective fore-aft lumbar travel prediction with a HPM-II dummy model. Paper presented at the Seventh International CTI Forum on Automotive Seats, Munich, Germany.
34.
Ng, D., Cassar, T., & Gross, C.M. (1995). Evaluation of an intelligent seat system. Applied Ergonomics, 26(2), 109-116.
35.
Porter, J.M., & Norris, B.J. (1987). The effects of posture and seat design on lumbar lordosis. In E. D. Megaw (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics (pp. 191-196). New York: Taylor and Francis.
36.
Reed, M.P., Roe, R.W., & Schneider, L.W. (1999). Design and development of the ASPECT manikin (Tech. Paper No. 1999-01-0963). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
37.
Reed, M.P., Saito, M., Kakishima, Y., Lee, N.S., & Schneider, L.W. (1991). An investigation of driver discomfort and related seat design factors in extended-duration driving (Tech. Paper No. 910117). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
38.
Reynolds, H.M. (1993). Automotive seat design for sitting comfort. In B. Peacock & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Automotive ergonomics (pp. 99-116). London : Taylor and Francis.
39.
Robinette, K.M., Daanen, H., & Paquet, E. (1999). The CAESAR project: A 3-D surface anthropometry survey. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Recent Advances in 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM'99) (pp. 380-386). Ottawa, ON.
40.
Roe, R.W., Reed, M.P., & Schneider, L.W. (1999). ASPECT manikin applications and measurements for design, audit and benchmarking (Tech. Paper No. 1999-01-0965) . Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
41.
Schneider, L.W., Reed, M.P., Roes, R.W., Manary, M.A., Flannagan, C.A.C., Hubbard, R.P., & Rupp, G.L. (1999). ASPECT: The next-generation H-Point machine and related vehicle and seat design and measurement tools (Tech. Paper No. 1999-01-0962) . Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
42.
Schneider, L.W., Robbins, D.H., Pflug, M.A., & Snyder, R.G. (1985). Development of anthropometrically based design specifications for an advanced adult anthropomorphic dummy family: Volume 1. Final report (DOT-HS-806-715). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration .
43.
Setyabudhy, R.H., Liu, Z., & Hubbard, R.P. (1999). Measurement and analysis of human thigh and buttocks contours for ASPECT manikin development (Tech. Paper No. 1999-01-0964). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers .
44.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (1995). Surface vehicle standard: Devices for use in defining and measuring vehicle seating accommodation. SAE J826. Issued 1962-11, Revised 1995-07. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers .
45.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (1998). Surface vehicle recommended practice: Driver selected seat position. SAE J1517. Issued 1985-10, Revised 1998-12. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
46.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2004). Surface vehicle standard: H-Point machine and design tool procedures and specifications. SAE J4002. Issued 2004-02. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
47.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2005). Surface vehicle recommended practice: Motor vehicle dimensions. SAE J1100. Issued 1973-09, Revised 2005-09. Warrendale, PA : Society of Automotive Engineers.
48.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2007). Surface vehicle recommended practice: Driver hand control reach. SAE J287. Issued 1976-07, Revised 2007-02. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
49.
Treaster, D.E., & Marras, W.S. (1989). Seat pressure: Measurement and analysis (Tech. Paper No. 890849). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
50.
Wawrow, P., & Cavanaugh, J.M. (2006). Lumbar support prominence and vertical position measurement methods in an occupied seat (Tech. Paper No. 2006-01-1300). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
