Objective: The present studies tested whether distance estimation training with metric feedback can degrade the performance of untrained primarily perceptual-motor tasks. Background: Training with metric feedback can improve distance estimations. However, previous research led to the conclusion that those improvements stemmed from changes in cognitive processing rather than in perception. If trainees applied their new cognitive strategies to primarily perceptual-motor tasks, then the performance of those tasks should degrade. The present studies tested that possibility. Method: Experiment 1 sought to replicate that training with metric feedback would improve metric distance estimations. Experiments 2 and 3 investigated whether such training would degrade the performance of a primarily perceptual-motor task. Experiment 4 investigated whether such training would affect a perceptual-motor task that required cognition. Results: Metric feedback improved metric distance estimation (Experiments 1—4) and throwing to a specified distance (Experiment 4). Metric feedback degraded throwing to a target (Experiments 2 and 3), although that effect was not evident when pretesting was omitted (Experiment 3). Conclusion: If distance estimation trainees apply what they learned from metric feedback to untrained primarily perceptual-motor tasks, then the performance of those tasks will suffer. However, if trainees apply what they learned to untrained tasks that require metric estimation, then the performance of those tasks will improve. Application: Distance estimation training with metric feedback may not generalize to other tasks and may even degrade performance on certain tasks. Future research must specify the conditions under which distance estimation training with metric feedback leads to performance improvements and decrements.
Beilock, S.L., & Carr, T.H. ( 2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 701-725.
2.
Beilock, S.L., & Gonso, S. ( 2008). Putting in the mind versus putting on the green: Expertise, performance time, and the linking of imagery and action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 920-932.
3.
Beilock, S.L., Wierenga, S.A., & Carr, T.H. ( 2002). Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55, 1211-1240.
4.
Bigham, D. ( 2000). Distance perception and visualization using virtual environments. Unpublished master’s thesis, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
5.
DeLucia, P.R. ( 1999). Critique of "Distance Estimation With Night Vision Goggles: A Little Feedback Goes a Long Way." Human Factors, 41, 507-510.
6.
DeLucia, P.R., & Task, H.L. ( 1995). Depth and collision judgment using night vision goggles . International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 371-386.
7.
Dyer, J.L., & Young, K.M. ( 1998). Night vision goggle research and training issues for ground forces: A literature review (Tech report number 1082). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute.
8.
Eby, D.W., & Loomis, J.M. ( 1987). A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 308-312.
9.
Ferris, S.H. ( 1972). Improvement of absolute distance estimation underwater . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 35, 299-305.
10.
Ferris, S.H. ( 1973a). Improving absolute distance estimation in clear and in turbid water. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 771-776.
11.
Ferris, S.H. ( 1973b). Improving distance estimation underwater: Long-term effectiveness of training. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 1089-1090.
12.
Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M.C., & Toni, I. ( 1996). Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia , 34, 369-376.
13.
Gibson, E.J., & Bergman, R. ( 1954). The effect of training on absolute estimation of distance over the ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 473-482.
14.
Gibson, E.J., Bergman, R., & Purdy, J. ( 1955). The effect of prior training with a scale of distance on absolute and relative judgments of distance over the ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 97-105.
15.
Gibson, J.J. ( 1947). Motion picture testing and research (Aviation Psychology Program Research Report No. 7). Washington, DC: Army Air Forces.
16.
Gilinsky, A.S. ( 1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460-482.
17.
Goodale, M.A., Kroliczak, G., & Westwood, D.A. (2005). Dual routes to action: Contributions of the dorsal and ventral streams to adaptive behavior. In V. Casagrande, R. Guillery, & S. Sherman (Eds.), Progress in brain research (pp. 269-283). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
18.
Gray, R. ( 2004). Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: Expertise differences, choking, and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10(4), 42-54.
19.
Guthrie, E.R. ( 1952). The psychology of learning (Rev. ed.). New York: Harper.
20.
Heft, H. ( 1993). A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: Distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Psychology, 5, 255-271.
21.
Hodge, M.H. ( 1981). Land-based range estimation (Research Note 81-01). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
22.
Hu, Y., & Goodale, M.A. ( 2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856-868.
23.
Kimura, D. ( 1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Kinney, J.A., Luria, S.M., & Weitzman, D.O. (1969). Effect of turbidity on judgments of distance underwater. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 28, 331-333.
25.
Kirk, R.E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
26.
Kroliczak, G., Heard, P., Goodale, M.A., & Gregory, R.L. ( 2006). Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Brain Research, 1080, 9-16.
27.
Loomis, J.M., Da Silva, J.A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S.S. (1992) Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906-921.
28.
Loomis, J.M., & Knapp, J.M. (2003). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments . In L. J. Hettinger & M. W. Haas (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments (pp. 21-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Luria, S.M., Kinney, J.A., & Weissman, S. ( 1967). Estimates of size and distance underwater. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 282-286.
30.
Mohler, B.J., Creem-Regehr, S.H., & Thompson, W.B. ( 2006). The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 9-14). Boston : Association for Computing Machinery.
31.
Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. ( 1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
Milner, A.D., Paulignan, H.C., Dijkerman, F., & Jeannerod, M.M. (1999). A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: New evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 266, 2225-2229.
33.
Myers, J.L., & Well, A. ( 1991). Research design and statistical analysis. New York: HarperCollins.
34.
Niall, K.K., Reising, J.D., & Martin, E.L. ( 1999). Distance estimation with night vision goggles: A little feedback goes a long way. Human Factors, 41, 495-506.
35.
Noble, C.E. ( 1968). The learning of psychomotor skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 19, 203-250.
36.
Norman, J. ( 2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 73-96.
37.
Pagano, C.C., & Bingham, G.P. ( 1998). Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1037-1051.
38.
Philbeck, J.W., & Loomis, J.M. ( 1997). Comparison of two indicators of visually perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 72-85.
39.
Reising, M., & Martin, E.L. ( 1994). Distance estimation training with night vision goggles: A preliminary study (AL/HR-TR-1994-0090). Dayton, OH: University of Dayton Research Institute.
40.
Reising, M., & Martin, E.L. ( 1995). Distance estimation training with night vision goggles under low illumination (AL/HR-TR-1994-0138). Dayton, OH : University of Dayton Research Institute.
41.
Richardson, A.R., & Waller, D. ( 2005). The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1089-1108.
42.
Richardson, A.R., & Waller, D. ( 2007). Interaction with an immersive virtual environment correct users’ distance estimates. Human Factors, 49, 507-517.
43.
Sahm, C.S., Creem-Regehr, S.H., Thompson, W.B., & Willemsen, P. ( 2005). Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 35-45.
44.
Smith, P.C., & Smith, O.W. ( 1961). Ball throwing responses to photographically portrayed targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 223-233.
45.
Solomon, R.L. ( 1949). Extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46, 137-150.
Taieb-Maimon, M. ( 2007). Learning headway estimation in driving. Human Factors, 49, 734-744.
48.
Thomson, J.A. ( 1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427-443.
49.
Waller, D. ( 1999). Factors affecting the perception of interobject distances in virtual environments. Presence, 8, 657-670.
50.
Witmer, B.G., & Kline, P.B. ( 1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments . Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 144-167.
51.
Witmer, B., & Sadowski, W. ( 1998). Non-visually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors, 40, 478-488.
52.
Witt, J.K., Proffitt, D.R., & Epstein, W. ( 2004). Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception, 33, 577-590.
53.
Wilkinson, L., & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. ( 1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
54.
Wohlwill, J.F. ( 1964). Changes in distance judgments as a function of corrected and uncorrected practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 403-413.
