Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether people change their isometric pinch grip generation depending on the surface they gripped. Specifically, the effect of grip surface friction condition on (a) maximum force produced in the direction normal to the contact surface, (b) fluctuation of normal force, and (c) the digit force’s angular deviation from the direction normal to the grip surface was quantified.
Background: Isometric pinch grip has been traditionally thought to be independent from the friction condition between the finger and gripped surface, which may be questionable.
Method: For this study, 12 healthy participants performed maximum isometric pinch grip exertion on high-friction rubber and low-friction paper surfaces. Maximum normal force, normal force variance, and digit force’s angular deviation from the normal direction were quantified.
Results: Pinch grip on the high-friction rubber surface was associated with 10% greater maximum normal force and 50% reduced normal force variance, compared with the low-friction paper surface (p < .05). Digit force’s angular deviation was not significantly different between the two surface friction conditions.
Conclusion: The data support that people do change their pinch grip generation (maximum normal force and normal force variance) depending on the surface they gripped, potentially by using sensory feedback. The results of this study demonstrate that even a simple isometric pinch grip (no lifting associated) is affected by grip surface friction.
Application: Grip surface condition should be considered for clinical assessments, biomechanical investigation, and motor control studies to ensure consistency in measurements and validity of comparisons.
BuchholzB.FrederickL. J.ArmstrongT. J. (1988). An investigation of human palmar skin friction and the effects of materials, pinch force and moisture. Ergonomics, 31, 317–325.
2.
CaldwellL. S.ChaffinD. B.Dukes-DobosF. N.KroemerK. H.LaubachL. L.SnookS. H.WassermanD. E. (1974). A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 35, 201–206.
3.
ColeK. J. (2006). Age-related directional bias of fingertip force. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 285–291.
4.
CrevecoeurF.ThonnardJ. L.LefevreP. (2010). Sensorimotor mapping for anticipatory grip force modulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 1401–1408.
5.
DempseyP. G.AyoubM. M. (1996). The influence of gender, grasp type, pinch width and wrist position on sustained pinch strength. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 17, 259–273.
6.
FrederickL. J.ArmstrongT. J. (1995). Effect of friction and load on pinch force in a hand transfer task. Ergonomics, 38, 2447–2454.
7.
GordonA. M.CharlesJ.SteenbergenB. (2006). Fingertip force planning during grasp is disrupted by impaired sensorimotor integration in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Pediatric Research, 60, 587–591.
8.
GordonA. M.ForssbergH.JohanssonR. S.WestlingG. (1991). Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: Comments on the contributions of size cues. Experimental Brain Research, 85, 226–229.
9.
HermsdorferJ.HaglE.NowakD. A.MarquardtC. (2003). Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 915–929.
10.
JohansonM. E.Valero-CuevasF. J.HentzV. R. (2001). Activation patterns of the thumb muscles during stable and unstable pinch tasks. Journal of Hand Surgery, 26, 698–705.
11.
JohanssonR. S.WestlingG. (1984). Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Experimental Brain Research, 56, 550–564.
12.
KinoshitaH. (1999). Effect of gloves on prehensile forces during lifting and holding tasks. Ergonomics, 42, 1372–1385.
13.
MacKenzieC. L.IberallT. (1994). The grasping hand. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
14.
MathiowetzV.KashmanN.VollandG.WeberK.DoweM.RogersS. (1985). Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, 69–74.
15.
MilnerT. E.DhaliwalS. S. (2002). Activation of intrinsic and extrinsic finger muscles in relation to the fingertip force vector. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 197–204.
16.
MonzeeJ.LamarreY.SmithA. M. (2003). The effects of digital anesthesia on force control using a precision grip. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 672–683.
17.
NewellK. M.CarltonL. G. (1985). On the relationship between peak force and peak force variability in isometric tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 230–241.
18.
NowakD. A.HermsdorferJ. (2005). Grip force behavior during object manipulation in neurological disorders: Toward an objective evaluation of manual performance deficits. Movement Disorders, 20, 11–25.
PanareseA.EdinB. B. (2011). Human ability to discriminate direction of three-dimensional force stimuli applied to the finger pad. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 541–547.
21.
QiuD.FischerH. C.KamperD. G. (2009). Muscle activation patterns during force generation of the index finger. Conference Proceedings–IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009, 3987–3990.
22.
SalimiI.BrochierT.SmithA. (1999). Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys using a precision grip: II. Responses to object texture and weights. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 835–844.
23.
SeoN. J.ArmstrongT. J. (2009). Friction coefficients in a longitudinal direction between the finger pad and selected materials for different normal forces and curvatures. Ergonomics, 52, 609–616.
24.
SeoN. J.RymerW. Z.KamperD. G. (2010). Altered digit force direction during pinch grip following stroke. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 891–901.
25.
ShimJ. K.LatashM. L.ZatsiorskyV. M. (2005). Prehension synergies in three dimensions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 766–776.
26.
Valero-CuevasF. J. (2000). Predictive modulation of muscle coordination pattern magnitude scales fingertip force magnitude over the voluntary range. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 1469–1479.
27.
Valero-CuevasF. J.JohansonM. E.TowlesJ. D. (2003). Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: The choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters. Journal of Biomechanics, 36, 1019–1030.
28.
Valero-CuevasF. J.TowlesJ. D.HentzV. R. (2000). Quantification of fingertip force reduction in the forefinger following simulated paralysis of extensor and intrinsic muscles. Journal of Biomechanics, 33, 1601–1609.
29.
Valero-CuevasF. J.ZajacF. E.BurgarC. G. (1998). Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation. Journal of Biomechanics, 31, 693–703.
30.
WestlingG.JohanssonR. S. (1984). Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Experimental Brain Research, 53, 277–284.
