Users’ Trust Evolvement in Fully Driverless Robotaxis During First Ride: An On-Road Study

Abstract

Objective

This study investigates how users’ trust evolves during their first ride in a fully driverless robotaxi and how it can be affected by user characteristics, system design, and traffic scenarios.

Background

As driving automation technology matures, driverless robotaxis have become available. Despite its immense economic and social potential, public acceptance can be strongly influenced by user trust. Previous research on trust in autonomous vehicles often relied on surveys, driving simulators, or “Wizard of Oz” methods, potentially introducing biases.

Method

An on-road experiment was conducted in commercially operating fully driverless robotaxis on public urban roads. In total, 30 participants with no prior experience riding fully driverless robotaxis were recruited, comprising nondrivers (n = 10), and drivers with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) driving automation experience. Dynamic trust was collected at a 2-min interval during the ride, along with participants’ think-aloud for changes in trust. A cumulative link mixed model was used to assess the impact of past driving experience, demographics, and riding time on trust development.

Results

Our findings revealed that dynamic trust increased gradually and stabilized over time, with user heterogeneity playing a moderating role in this process. Further think-aloud data analysis identified key factors in trust formation, including driving style, riding safety and comfort, and user interface design.

Conclusion

Trust in driverless robotaxis builds progressively with real-world exposure, shaped by user characteristics, vehicle control, and interface design.

Application

Our findings underscore the importance of considering user heterogeneity in fostering trust and acceptance of robotaxis.

Keywords

trust in automation level 4 autonomous vehicles first-time use

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anqi

(2024). The current state of self-driving across China in 2024. 36Kr. Retrieved 21 May from. https://kr-asia.com/the-current-state-of-self-driving-across-china-in-2024

Beggiato

Pereira

Petzoldt

Krems

(2015). Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of acc. A longitudinal on-road study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 35, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.005

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Charness

Yoon

J. S.

Souders

Stothart

Yehnert

(2018). Predictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: The roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02589

Cheng

(2023). China’s capital city is letting the public take fully driverless robotaxis — and has bigger rollout plans, startup pony.ai says. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/19/chinas-capital-city-beijing-has-big-plans-for-robotaxis-ponyai-says.html

Christensen

(2025). ordinal—Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2025.12-29. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal.

Corbin

Strauss

(2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.

Cross

C. P.

Cyrenne

D.-L. M.

Brown

G. R.

(2013). Sex differences in sensation-seeking: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 2486. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02486

Cysneiros

L. M.

Raffi

do Prado Leite

J. C. S.

(2018). Software transparency as a key requirement for self-driving cars. 2018 IEEE 26th international requirements engineering conference (RE), Banff, AB, Canada, 20–24 August 2018.

10.

Dichabeng

Merat

Markkula

(2021). Factors that influence the acceptance of future shared automated vehicles – A focus group study with United Kingdom drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 82, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.009

11.

Dong

Sun

Wang

Waygood

E. O. D.

(2025). From first ride to regular user: Understanding the factors influencing continuous use intention of autonomous taxis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 113, 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.04.019

12.

Eccles

D. W.

Arsal

(2017). The think aloud method: What is it and how do I use it? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(4), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1331501

13.

Ekman

Johansson

Karlsson

Strömberg

Bligård

L.-O.

(2021). Trust in what? Exploring the interdependency between an automated vehicle’s driving style and traffic situations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 76, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.012

14.

Greifenstein

(2024). Factors influencing the user behaviour of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs): A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 100, 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.027

15.

Harper

C. D.

Hendrickson

C. T.

Mangones

Samaras

(2016). Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 72, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003

16.

Hartwich

Hollander

Johannmeyer

Krems

J. F.

(2021). Improving passenger experience and trust in automated vehicles through user-adaptive HMIs: “The more the better” does not apply to everyone. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3, 669030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.669030

17.

Hoff

K. A.

Bashir

(2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570

18.

Huang

Wen

Yan

(2023). Beyond adaptive cruise control and Lane centering control: Drivers’ mental model of and trust in emerging ADAS technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1236062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236062

19.

Huang

Wang

Yan

(2024a). Investigating the interrelationships among factors associated with automated vehicle crashes using additive Bayesian network. Transportation Research Record, 2679(2), 1908–1921. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241274152

20.

Huang

Wen

(2024b). Characteristics of rear-end collisions: A comparison between automated driving system-involved crashes and advanced driving assistance system-involved crashes. Transportation Research Record, 2678(7), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231209319

21.

Juliussen

(2025). Pony ai update: Robotaxis and robotruck services. Retrieved Oct 13 from. https://www.eetimes.eu/pony-ai-update-robotaxis-and-robotruck-services/

22.

Kuckartz

Rädiker

(2019). Analyzing qualitative data with maxqda. Springer.

23.

Kyriakidis

Happee

De Winter

J. C.

(2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014

24.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

25.

Lee

J. D.

Liu

S.-Y.

Domeyer

DinparastDjadid

(2021). Assessing drivers’ trust of automated vehicle driving styles with a two-part mixed model of intervention tendency and magnitude. Human Factors, 63(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819880363

26.

Lee

Y. M.

Madigan

Louw

Lehtonen

Merat

(2023). Does users’ experience and evaluation of level 3 automated driving functions predict willingness to use: Results from an on-road study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 99, 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.11.004

27.

Lindgren

Fors

Pink

Osz

(2020). Anticipatory experience in everyday autonomous driving. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 24(6), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01410-6

28.

Zhang

Zheng Ma

Y. Z.

(2024). Fostering drivers’ trust in automated driving styles: The role of driver perception of automated driving maneuvers. Human Factors, 66(7), 1961. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231189661

29.

Manchon

J. B.

Bueno

Navarro

(2022). How the initial level of trust in automated driving impacts drivers’ behaviour and early trust construction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 86, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.02.006

30.

Massar

Reza

Rahman

S. M.

Abdullah

S. M. H.

Jamal

Al-Ismail

F. S.

(2021). Impacts of autonomous vehicles on greenhouse gas emissions—positive or negative? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115567

31.

Molnar

L. J.

Ryan

L. H.

Pradhan

A. K.

Eby

D. W.

Louis

R. M. S.

Zakrajsek

J. S.

(2018). Understanding trust and acceptance of automated vehicles: An exploratory simulator study of transfer of control between automated and manual driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.004

32.

Mosaferchi

Califano

Naddeo

(2023). How personality, demographics, and technology affinity affect trust in autonomous vehicles: A case study. Human Factors in Transportation, 95(95), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003808

33.

Narayanan

Chaniotakis

Antoniou

(2020). Factors affecting traffic flow efficiency implications of connected and autonomous vehicles: A review and policy recommendations. In Milakis

Thomopoulos

van Wee

(Eds.), Advances in transport policy and planning (Vol. 5, pp. 1–50). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.02.004

34.

Newcombe

R. G.

(1998). Two‐sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17(8), 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>3.0.CO;2-E

35.

Nordhoff

Lehtonen

(2025). Examining the effect of personality on user acceptance of conditionally automated vehicles. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84776-4

36.

Nordhoff

Stapel

Gentner

Happee

(2021). Perceived safety and trust in sae level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire. PLoS One, 16(12), Article e0260953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260953

37.

Nordhoff

Stapel

Gentner

Happee

(2023). Do driver’s characteristics, system performance, perceived safety, and trust influence how drivers use partial automation? A structural equation modelling analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1125031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125031

38.

Oliveira

Burns

Luton

Iyer

Birrell

(2020). The influence of system transparency on trust: Evaluating interfaces in a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 72, 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.001

39.

Paddeu

Parkhurst

Shergold

(2020). Passenger comfort and trust on first-time use of a shared autonomous shuttle vehicle. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 115, 102604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.026

40.

Peng

Merat

Romano

Hajiseyedjavadi

Paschalidis

Wei

Radhakrishnan

Solernou

Forster

Boer

(2024). Drivers’ evaluation of different automated driving styles: Is it both comfortable and natural? Human Factors, 66(3), 787–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221113448

41.

Pony.ai . (2025). Pony ai inc. Accelerates gen-7 robotaxi production with over 200 newly produced, on track to scale up 1,000-vehicle fleet by year end. https://ir.pony.ai/news-releases/news-release-details/pony-ai-inc-accelerates-gen-7-robotaxi-production-over-200-newly

42.

SAE. (2021). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. In SAE International Recommended Practice, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, SAE Standard J3016_202104, Revised April 2021, Issued January 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/J3016_202104

43.

Schober

Boer

Schwarte

L. A.

(2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

44.

Sun

Tang

Zhou

Peng

H. N.

Wang

(2020). Exploring personalised autonomous vehicles to influence user trust. Cognitive Computation, 12(6), 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09757-x

45.

Sutter

J. M.

Kalivas

J. H.

(1993). Comparison of forward selection, backward elimination, and generalized simulated annealing for variable selection. Microchemical Journal, 47(1-2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/mchj.1993.1012

46.

Vrieze

S. I.

(2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127

47.

Wang

Huang

(2023). Influential factors of users' trust in the range estimation systems of battery electric vehicles--a survey study in China. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10076. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.10076

48.

Wang

M.-C.

Dai

X.-Y.

Yao

S.-Q.

(2010). Development of Chinese big five personality inventory (CBF-PI)—Theoretical framework and relability analysis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(5), 545–548. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2011.04.004

49.

Wang

Sun

(2024). An exploration of users’ trust in and willingness to pay for fully driverless vehicles after their first ride. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting, 68(1), 861–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275514

50.

Wilson

K. M.

Yang

Roady

Kuo

Lenné

M. G.

(2020). Driver trust & mode confusion in an on-road study of level-2 automated vehicle technology. Safety Science, 130, 104845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104845

51.

Xinhua . (2025). China’s burgeoning autonomous driving industry fuels robotaxi use, development. Chinadaily. Retrieved 12 January from. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202501/12/WS6782fab9a310f1265a1da4a3.html

52.

Yamamoto

(2019). Evaluating the impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic safety. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 526, 121009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.245

53.

Zhang

Tao

Zhang

Lin

Zhang

(2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018