Comparison of Primary and Secondary Task Measures as a Function of Simulated Vehicle Dynamics and Driving Conditions

Abstract

In a previously reported experiment involving a moving base driving simulator with computer-generated display, secondary task measures of workload showed significant increases as a function of large changes in vehicle dynamics and disturbance levels. Because the secondary task measures appeared less sensitive than desired, driving performance measures recorded during the same experiment were later analyzed. Particular emphasis in examining the driving performance data was placed on (1) determining the degree of intrusion of the secondary task on the driving task as a function of the independent variables, and (2) on comparing the sensitivity of the primary and secondary task measures. The results showed the secondary task does intrude significantly upon the driving task performance at low workload levels, but that it does not significantly intrude at high workload levels. Also, when the four primary task measures were analyzed for sensitivity to the independent variables, new information was obtained indicating greater sensitivity than is obtained with the single secondary task measure. Steering ratio, for example, is found to affect performance at high disturbance levels—a result not obtained in examining the secondary task by itself. The merits of primary and secondary task performance analysis are discussed, and suggestions are made for future work.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

I. D.

A comparison of two subsidiary tasks used to measure fatigue in drivers. Ergonomics, 1965, 8, 467–473.

Brown

I. D.

Subjective and objective comparisons of successful and unsuccessful trainee drivers. Ergonomics, 1966, 9, 49–56.

Brown

I. D.

Simmonds

D. C. V.

Tickner

A. H.

Measurement of control skills, vigilance, and performance of a subsidiary task during 12 hours of car driving. Ergonomics, 1967, 10, 665–673.

Hoffman

E. R.

Joubert

P. N.

The effect of changes in some vehicle handling variables on driver steering performance. Human Factors, 1966, 8, 245–263.

Kalsbeek

J. W. H.

On the measurement of deterioration in performance caused by distraction stress. Ergonomics, 1964, 7, 187–195.

Kelley

C. R.

Wargo

M. J.

Cross-adaptive operator loading tasks. Human Factors, 1967, 9, 395–404.

McLean

J. R.

Hoffman

E. R.

Steering reversals as a measure of driver performance and steering task difficulty. Human Factors, 1975, 17, 248–256.

Olson

P. L.

Thompson

R. R.

The effect of variable-ratio steering gears on driver preference and performance. Human Factors, 1970, 12, 553–558.

Repa

B. S.

Wierwille

W. W.

Driver performance in controlling a driving simulator with varying vehicle response characteristics. SAE Paper No. 760779, presented at SAE National Automobile Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting, Detroit, October, 1976. (See also GM Research Laboratories Report No. GMR-2205, July 27, 1976.)

10.

Rolfe

J. M.

A study of setting performance on a digit display. Farnborough, Hants, UK: Royal Air Force, Institute of Aviation Medicine, Report No. 365, 1966.

11.

Rolfe

J. M.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of a secondary task using psychological and physiological measures. Farnborough, Hants, UK: Royal Air Force, Institute of Aviation Medicine, Report No. 473, 1969.

12.

Rolfe

J. M.

The secondary task as a measure of mental load. In Singleton

W. T.

(Ed.) Measurement of man at work. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1971, 135–148.

13.

Wierwille

W. W.

Gutmann

J. C.

Hicks

T. G.

Muto

W. H.

Secondary task measurement of workload as a function of simulated vehicle dynamics and driving conditions. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 557–565.

14.

Winer

B. J.

Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.