Visual Mechanisms and Predictors of Far Field Visual Task Performance

Abstract

Visual mechanisms involved in target detection, recognition, and tracking were examined. Relationships were analyzed in the context of simulated combat, focusing on the short-range air defense weapon operator. Objectives were to identify visual ability interrelations, predictors of performance, and interactions with cuing, target characteristics, and experience. Good predictors included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, resting focus, near focal point, and blur interpretation. Many of these abilities interacted with the independent variables, producing differential effects on performance. Visual abilities logically grouped into three principal components: active accommodation predicted target detection and identification; passive accommodation predicted detection and acquisition; and image interpretation predicted acquisition, identification, and tracking. Results supported the three visual subsystems hypothesis, based on neurophysiological evidence of pathways in the brain corresponding to specific visual functions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barber, A. V. (1987). The Realistic Air Defense Engagement System: Three years of research results. El Paso, TX: Science Applications International.

Barber, A. V. (1989). Visual mechanisms and predictors of far field visual task performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Barber, A. , Drewfs, P. , and Johnson, D. (1987). Performance of Stinger teams using the RADES multiple weapon configuration (ARI WP FB-87-90). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Barber, A. , Drewfs, P. , and Lockhart, J. (1987). Effective Stinger training in RADES (ARI WP FB-87-02). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Cornsweet, T. N. , and Crane, H. D. (1970a). Ocular-focus stimulator. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 60, 577.

Cornsweet, T. N. , and Crane, H. D. (1970b). Servo-controlled infrared optometer. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 60, 548–554.

Drewfs, P. , Barber, A. , Johnson, D. , and Frederickson, E. (1988). Validation of the realistic air defense engagement system (RADES) (ARI TR 789). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Eriksen, C. W. , and St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.

Ginsburg, A. P. (1984). Contrast sensitivity as a metric for pilot acquisition performance. In Proceedings of the Tri-Service Aeromedical Research Panel (NAMRL Monograph 33, pp. 18–27). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

10.

Hennessy, R. , and Leibowitz, H. (1972). Laser optometer incorporating the Badal principle. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 4, 237–239.

11.

Iavecchia, J. H. , Iavecchia, H. P. , and Roscoe, S. N. (1983). The moon illusion revisited. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 54, 39–46.

12.

Leibowitz, H.W. , and Shupert, C. L. (1984). Low luminance and spatial orientation. In Proceedings of the Tri-Service Aeromedical Research Panel (NAMRL Monograph 33, pp. 97–104). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

13.

Livingstone, M. S. , and Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416–3468.

14.

Matthews, M. L. , Angus, R. G. , and Pearce, D. G. (1978). Effectiveness of accommodative aids in reducing empty field myopia in visual search. Human Factors, 20, 733–740.

15.

Merigan, W. H., Katz, L. M., and Maunsell, J. H. R. (in press). Contribution of the primate parvocellular pathway to acuity and contrast sensitivity. Journal of Neuroscience.

16.

Monaco, W. , and Hamilton, P. (1984). Air-to-air target detection. In Proceedings of the Tri-Service Aeromedical Research Panel (NAMRL Monograph 33, pp. 11–17). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

17.

Morey, W. A. , Bory, A. , Grissett, J. D. , and Houk, W. M. (1984). Dark focus, accommodative flexibility, and flight performance. In Proceedings of the Tri-Service Aeromedical Research Panel (NAMRL Monograph 33, pp. 66–73). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

18.

Norman, J. , and Ehrlich, S. (1986) Visual accommodation and virtual image displays: Target detection and recognition. Human Factors, 28, 135–151.

19.

Posner, M. I. , Snyder, C. R. R. , and Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.

20.

Regan, D. (1984). Visual factors in flying performance. In Proceedings of the Tri-Service Aeromedical Research Panel (NAMRL Monograph 33, pp. 3–10). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

21.

Roscoe, S. N. (1979). Landing airplanes, detecting traffic, and the dark focus. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 53, 970–976.

22.

Simonelli, N. (1980). Polarized vernier optometer. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 293–296.