A Method for Evaluating Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices Using Fitts' Law

Abstract

The discrete movement task employed in this study consisted of moving a cursor from the center of a computer display screen to circular targets located 24.4 and 110.9 mm in eight radial directions. The target diameters were 2.7, 8.1, and 24.2 mm. Performance measures included movement time, cursor path distance, and root-mean-square cursor deviation. Ten subjects with no movement disabilities were studied using a conventional mouse and a lightweight ultrasonic headcontrolled computer input pointing device. Average movement time was 306 ms greater (63%) for the head-controlled pointer than for the mouse. The effect of direction on movement time for the mouse was relatively small compared with the head-controlled pointer, which was lowest at 90 and 270 deg, corresponding to head extension and head flexion, respectively. Average path distance and root mean square displacement was lowest at off-diagonal directions (0, 90, 180, and 270 deg). This methodology was also shown to be useful for evaluating performance using an alternative head-controlled input device for two subjects having cerebral palsy, and measured subtle performance improvements after providing a disabled subject with lateral torso support.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andres, R. O. , and Hartung, K. J. (1989). Prediction of head movement time using Fitts' law. Human Factors, 31, 703–713.

Berliss, J. R. , Borden, P. A. , and Vanderheiden, G. C. (1989). Trace resource book. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Trace Research and Development Center.

Card, S. K. , English, W. K. , and Burr, B. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601–613.

English, W. K. , Engelbart, D. C. , and Berman, M. L. (1967). Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. IEEE transactions on Human Factors in Electronics. HFE-8 (1), 5–15.

Epps, B. W. (1986). Comparison of six cursor control devices based on Fitts' law models, In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 327–331). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 381–391.

Fitts, P. M. , and Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 34.1–34.10.

Goodwin, N. C. (1975). Cursor positioning on an electronic display using lightpen, lightgun, or keyboard for three basic tasks. Human Factors, 17, 289–295.

Jagacinski, R. J. , and Monk, D. L. (1985). Fitts' law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 77–95.

10.

Langolf, G. D. , Chaffin, D. B. , and Foulke, J. A. (1976). An investigation of Fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 113–128.

11.

Lee, C. C. , and Vanderheiden, G. C. (1987). Keyboard equivalent for mouse input. In Proceedings of the RESNA 10th Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Technology (pp. 711–713). Washington, DC: RESNA.

12.

Rosen, M. J., Goodenough- Trepangier, X., Getschow, C. 0.,

13.

Felts, T. J. (1986). Qualitative aspects of Fitts' task performance by motor-disabled individuals. In Proceedings of the RESNA 9th Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Technology (pp. 161-163). Washington, DC: RESNA.

14.

Schmidtke, H. , and Stier, F. (1961). An experimental evaluation of the validity of predetermined elemental time systems. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 12(3), 182–204.

15.

Whitefield, A. (1986). Human factors aspects of pointing as an input technique in interactive systems. Applied Ergonomics, 17, 97–104.

16.

Whitfield, D. , Bait, R. G. , and Bird, J. M. (1983). Some comparisons of on-display and off-display touch input devices for interaction with computer-generated displays. Ergonomics, 26, 1033-1053.