The Accuracy of Consumer-Made Body Measurements for Women's Mail-Order Clothing

Abstract

An anthropometric study was performed on 103 women 19 to 50 years of age. Each subject measured 19 dimensions of her own body and then performed similar measurements on a random partner using a conventional tape measure with 1/16 inch (1.6-mm) precision. The experimenter measured all subjects using a laboratory-grade anthropometer and tape measure with 1.0-mm precision as a standard. Subjects' measurements of different body dimensions had significantly different average errors, ranging from -4.54 cm to +6.15 cm. Hip circumference, which is often utilized as a key dimension for garment sizing, was significantly undermeasured (M = -4.54 cm). Measurements having the least error included waist, bust, and neck circumferences and shoulder and waist heights. Subjects' measurements of their own bodies had greater absolute error (M = 4.10 cm, SD = 6.06 cm) than those of their partners (M == 3.34 cm, SD = 4.86 cm). Although subjects used a tape measure having 1.6-mm precision, 97% reported measurements using only 1/4-inch (6.4-mm) precision or less. Subjects overestimated their own stature by an average error of 0.68 cm (SD = 4.02 cm) and an absolute error of 2.26 cm (SD = 3.39 cm).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belkin, L. (1986, March 1). Taking measure of Americans: Size guides get updating. New York Times, Section I, p. 33.

Buckle, P. W. (1985). Self-reported anthropometry. Ergonomics, 28, 1575–1577.

Churchill, E. , Churchill, T. , McConville, J. , and White, M. (1977). Anthropometry of the U.S. Army-1977, report no. 2. The basic univariate statistics (Tech. Report NATICK/TR-TI/024). Natick, MA: U.S. Army Natick Research and Development Command.

Delk, A. E. , and Cassill, N. L. (1989). Jeans sizing: Problems and recommendations. Apparel Manufacturer, 1, 18–23.

Fellingham, C. (1991, August). Whose body is this for, anyway? The secrets of a perfect fit. Glamour, pp. 159–160.

Frobin, W. , Hierholzer, E. , and Drerup, B. (1982). Mathematical representation and shape analysis of irregular body surfaces. Biostereometrics, 1982, 361, 132–139.

Gallwey, T. J. , and Fittzgibbon, M. J. (1991). Some anthropometric measures on an Irish population. Applied Ergonomics, 22, 9–12.

Garrett, J. W. (1971). The adult human hand: Some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations. Human Factors, 13, 117–131.

LaBat, K. L. (1987). Consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the fit of ready-to-wear clothing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.

10.

Laubach, L. L. , McConville, J. T. , Churchill, E. , and White, R. M. (1977). Anthropometry of women of the U.S. Army-1977, report no. 1. Methodology and survey plan (Tech. Report NATICK/TR-77/021). Natick, MA: U.S. Army Natick Research and Development Command.

11.

Lovesey, E. J. (1974). The development of a 3-dimensional anthropometric measuring technique. Applied Ergonomics, 5, 36–41.

12.

Molenbroek, J. F. M. (1987). Anthropometry of elderly people in the Netherlands: Research and applications. Applied Ergonomics, 18, 187–199.

13.

Mollard, R. , Sauvignon, M. , and Pineau, J. C. (1982). Biostereometric study of a sample of 50 young adults by photogrammetry. Biostereometrics, 1982, 361, 234–240.

14.

Roebuck, J. J. A. , Kroemer, K. H. E. , and Thomson, W. G. (1975). Engineering anthropometry methods. New York: Wiley.

15.

Sheldon, W. (1970). The varieties of human physique. Darien, CT: Hafner.

16.

Smallwood, V. , and Wiener, J. (1987). Light and heavy catalog shoppers of clothing. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 5(3), 25–30.

17.

Yoon, Y. C. (1992). A methodology for devising an anthropometric size description system for women's apparel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.