Mainstream leadership studies tend to privilege and separate leaders from followers. This article highlights the value of rethinking leadership as a set of dialectical relationships. Drawing on post-structuralist perspectives, this approach reconsiders the relations and practices of leaders and followers as mutually constituting and co-produced. It also highlights the tensions, contradictions and ambiguities that typically characterize these shifting asymmetrical and interdependent leadership dynamics. Exploring three interrelated ‘dialectics’ (control/resistance, dissent/consent and men/women), the article raises a number of issues frequently neglected in the mainstream literature. It emphasizes that leaders exercise considerable power, that their control is often shifting, paradoxical and contradictory, that followers’ practices are frequently proactive, knowledgeable and oppositional, that gender crucially shapes control/resistance/consent dialectics and that leaders themselves may engage in workplace dissent. The article concludes that dialectical perspectives can provide new and innovative ways of understanding leadership.
Ackroyd, S. & Thompson, P.Organizational misbehaviour. London: Sage , 1999.
2.
Adams, S.Roche versus Adams. London: Jonathan Cape , 1984.
3.
Antonakis, J. & Atwater, L.Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory . Leadership Quarterly, 2002, 13(6), 673-704 .
4.
Ashcraft, K.L.Resistance through consent?Management Communication Quarterly, 2005, 19(1), 67-90 .
5.
Ashcraft, K.L. & Mumby, D.K.Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. London: Sage , 2004.
6.
Baxter, L. & Hughes, C.Tongue sandwiches and bagel days: Sex, food and mind-body dualism . Gender, Work and Organization, 2004, 11(4), 363-380 .
7.
Baxter, L.A. & Montgomery, B.M.Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guildford Press , 1996.
8.
Bies, R.J. , Tripp, T.M. & Kramer, R.M.At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. In R.A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds), Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1997, pp. 18-36.
9.
Bjerke, B.Business leadership and culture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar , 1999.
10.
Bowring, M.A.Resistance is not futile: Liberating captain Janeway from the masculine-feminine dualism of leadership . Gender, Work and Organization, 2004, 11, 4381-4405 .
11.
Bratton, J. , Grint, K. & Nelson, D.Organizational leadership. Mason, OH: South Western/Thomson , 2004.
12.
Braverman, H.Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Press , 1974.
13.
Burrell, G.Modernism, post-modernism and organisational analysis, II: The contribution of Michel Foucault . Organization Studies, 1988, 9(2), 221-236 .
14.
Burrell, G. & Morgan, G.Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann , 1979.
15.
Calas, M. & Smircich, L.Voicing seduction to silence leadership . Organization Studies, 1991, 12, 567-602 .
16.
Casey, C.Work, self and society. London: Sage , 1995.
Collinson, D.Identities and insecurities: Selves at work . Organization, 2003, 10(3), 527-547 .
25.
Collinson, D.Questions of distance . Leadership, 2005a, 1(2), 235-250 .
26.
Collinson, D.Refuting romanticism: The value of feminist perspectives for understanding resistance . Organization, 2005b, 12(5), 741-746 .
27.
Collinson, D. & Collinson, M.Leadership challenges. Centre for Excellence in Leadership Working Paper Series, Lancaster University , 2005.
28.
Collinson, D. & Hearn, J. (Eds) Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities and managements. London: Sage , 1996.
29.
Collinson, D. , Knights, D. & Collinson, M.Managing to discriminate. London: Routledge , 1990.
30.
Council for Excellence in Management and Leadership (CEML) 2002.
31.
Delbridge, R. & Ezzamel, M. (Eds) Special issue on conceptions of control . Organization, 2005, 12(5).
32.
Edwards, P.K. , Collinson, D.L. & Della Rocca, G.Workplace resistance in Western Europe . European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1995, 1(3), 283-316 .
33.
Edwards, P.K.E. & Scullion, H.The social organization of industrial conflict. Oxford: Basil Blackwell , 1982.
34.
Fairhurst, G.T.Dualisms in leadership research. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2001, pp. 379-439.
35.
Fleetwood, S.Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective . Organization, 2005, 12(2), 197-222 .
36.
Fleming, P.Metaphors of resistance . Management Communication Quarterly, 2005, 19(1), 45-66 .
37.
Fleming, P. & Spicer, A.Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance . Organization, 2003, 10(1), 157-179 .
38.
Foucault, M.Discipline and punish. London: Allen and Unwin , 1977.
39.
Foucault, M.The history of sexuality. London: Allen and Unwin , 1979.
40.
Fournier, V. & Grey, C.At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies . Human Relations, 2000, 53(1), 7-32 .
41.
Fulop, L. , Linstead, S. & Dunford, R.Leading and managing. In S. Linstead , L. Fulop & S. Lilley (Eds), Management and organization: A critical text. Basingstoke: Palgrave , 2004, pp. 324-363.
42.
Gabriel, Y.Meeting God: When organizational members come face to face with the supreme leader . Human Relations, 1997, 50(4), 315-342 .
43.
Gardner, W.L. & Avolio, B.J.The charismatic relationship: A dramaturgical perspective . Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23, 32-58 .
44.
Gemmill, G. & Oakley, J.Leadership: An alienating social myth . Human Relations, 1992, 45(2), 113-129 .
45.
Giddens, A.Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan , 1979.
46.
Giddens, A.The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity , 1984.
47.
Giddens, A.Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity , 1987.
48.
Giddens, A.The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity , 1990.
49.
Giddens, A.Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity , 1991.
50.
Goffee, R. & Jones, G.Followership: It’s personal too . Harvard Business Review, 2001, 79(11), 148 .
51.
Goffman, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1959.
52.
Gordon, R.D.Conceptualizing leadership with respect to its historical-contextual antecedents to power . Leadership Quarterly, 2002, 13(2), 151-167 .
53.
Graen, G. & Uhl-Bien, M.Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange theory of leadership over 25 years . Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(2), 219-247 .
54.
Graham, J.W.Principled organizational dissent . Research in Organizational Behaviour, 1986, 8, 1-52 .
55.
Grint, K.The arts of leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2000.
56.
Grint, K.Leadership: Limits and possibilities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan , 2005.
57.
Gronn, P.Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis . Leadership Quarterly, 2002, 13(4), 423-452 .
58.
Grover, S.L.Lying in organizations: Theory, research and future directions. In R.A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds), Antisocial behaviour in organizations. London: Sage , 1997, pp. 68-84.
59.
Hardy, C. & Clegg, S.R.Some dare call it power. In S.R. Clegg & C. Hardy (Eds), Studying organization: Theory and method. London: Sage , 1999, pp. 368-387.
60.
Heifetz, R.A. & Laurie, D.L.The work of leadership . Harvard Business Review, 1997, Jan.-Feb., 124-134 .
61.
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K.Management of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall , 1996.
62.
Hirschman, A.D.Exit, voice and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1970.
63.
Hodson, R.Worker resistance: An underdeveloped concept in the sociology of work . Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1995, 16, 79-110 .
64.
House, R.A path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy and a reformulated theory . Leadership Quarterly, 1971, 7(3), 323-352 .
65.
Howell, J. & Shamir, B.The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences . Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(1), 96-112 .
66.
Jermier, J.M. , Knights, D. & Nord, W.R. (Eds) Resistance and power in organisations. London: Routledge , 1994.
67.
Jones, A.M.The elementary structures of the family firm: An anthropological perspective . Human Organization, 2005, 64(3), 276-285 .
68.
Kelley, R.E.The power of followership. New York: Doubleday , 1992.
69.
Kelley, R.E.Followership. In J. MacGregor Burns , G.R. Goethals & G.I. Sorenson (Eds), Encyclopedia of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Reference/Berkshire , 2004, pp. 504-513.
70.
Klein, N.No logo. London: Flamingo , 2000.
71.
Knights, D.Organization theory in the age of deconstruction: Dualism, gender and post-modernism revisited . Organization Studies, 1997, 18(1), 1-20 .
72.
Knights, D. & Willmott, H.Conceptualising leadership process: A study of senior managers in a financial services company . Journal of Management Studies, 1992, 29(6), 760-782 .
73.
Kondo, D.K.Crafting selves: Power, gender and discourses of identity in a Japanese work-place. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1990.
74.
La-Nuez, D. & Jermier, J.M.Sabotage by managers and technocrats: Neglected patterns of resistance at work. In J.M. Jermier , D. Knights & W.R. Nord (Eds), Resistance and power in organisations. London: Routledge , 1994, pp. 219-251.
75.
Larson, G.S. & Tompkins, P.K.Ambivalence and resistance: A study of management in a concertive control system . Communication Monographs, 2005, 72(1), 1-21 .
76.
Leidner, R.Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1993.
77.
Lord, R.G. & Brown, D.J.Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 2003.
78.
Mechanic, D.Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1962, 7, 349-364 .
79.
Meindl, J.The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach . Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(3), 329-341 .
80.
Meindl, J. , Ehrlich, S.B. & Dukerich, J.M.The romance of leadership . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30(1), 78-102 .
81.
Meyerson, D.E.Tempered radicals. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School , 2001.
82.
Mingers, J.What is it to be critical?Management Learning, 2000, 31(2), 219-237 .
83.
Mitchell, V.Everyday metaphors of power . Theory and Society, 1990, 19(5), 545-578 .
84.
Mole, G.Can leadership be taught? In J. Storey (Ed.), Leadership in organizations. London: Routledge , 2004, pp. 125-137.
85.
Mumby, D.Theorizing resistance in organization studies . Management Communication Quarterly, 2005, 19(1), 19-44 .
86.
Mumby, D. & Stohl, C.Power and discourse in organizational studies: Absence and the dialectic of control . Discourse and Society, 1991, 2(3), 313-332 .
87.
Neuman, J.H. and Baron, R.A.Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific norms, potential causes, and preferred targets . Journal of Management, 1998, 24, 391-419 .
88.
Noon, M. & Blyton, P.The realities of work, 2nd edn.London: Macmillan , 2002.
89.
Northhouse, P.G.Leadership theory and practice, 3rd edn.London: Sage , 2004.
Prasad, A. & Prasad, P.Everyday struggles at the workplace: The nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations. In P.A. Bamberger & W.J. Sonnenstuhl (Eds), Research in the sociology of organizations. Stamford, CT: JAI , 1998, pp. 225-257.
92.
Prince, L.The neglected rules: On leadership and dissent. In A. Coulson (Ed.), Trust and contracts: Relationships in local governement health and public services. Bristol: The Polity Press , 1998, pp. 95-126.
93.
Prince, L.Eating the menu rather than the diner: Tao and leadership . Leadership, 2005, 1(1), 105-126 .
94.
Raelin, J.Creating leaderful organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler , 2003.
95.
Ray, T. , Clegg, S. & Gordon, R.A new look at dispersed leadership: Power, knowledge and context. In J. Storey (Ed.), Leadership in organizations. London: Routledge , 2004, pp. 319-336.
96.
Real, K. & Putnam, L.Ironies in the discursive struggle of pilots defending the profession . Management Communication Quarterly, 2005, 19(1), 91-119 .
Rothschild, J. & Miethe, T.D.Whistleblowing as resistance in modern work organizations. In D. Jermier , D. Knights & W.R. Nord (Eds), Resistance and power in organisations. London: Routledge , 1994, pp. 252-273.
99.
Scott, J.Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press , 1985.
100.
Scott, J.C.Domination and the arts of resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press , 1990.
101.
Shamir, B. , House, R.J. & Arthur, M.B.The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-based concept theory . Organization Science, 1993, 4(4), 577-594 .
102.
Sinclair, A.Doing leadership differently. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press , 1998.
Skarlicki, D.P. & Folger, R.Retaliation in the workplace: The rules of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82, 416-425 .
105.
Smircich, L. & Morgan, G.Leadership: The management of meaning . The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 1982, 18(3), 257-273 .
106.
Surman, E.Dialectics of dualism: The symbolic importance of the home/work divide . Ephemera, 2002, 2(3), 209-223 .
107.
Thomas, A.B.Controversies in management, 2nd edn.London: Routledge , 2003.
108.
Trethewey, A.Resistance, identity and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization . Communication Monographs, 1997, 64, 281-301 .
109.
Van Maanen, J.The smile factory. In P. Frostet al. (Eds), Reframing organizational culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1991, pp. 58-76.
110.
Vardi, Y. & Weitz, E.Misbehavior in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 2003.
111.
Wayne, S.J. , Liden, R.C. , Graf, I.K. & Ferris, G.R.The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions . Personnel Psychology, 1997, 50, 979-1006 .
112.
Willis, P.Learning to labour. Aldershot: Saxon House , 1977.
113.
Willmott, H.Theorizing contemporary control: Some post-structuralist responses to some critical realist questions . Organization, 2005, 12(5), 747-780 .
