In this article, we provide a critique and re-specification of international business and institutional literature related to the interactions of multinational corporations (MNCs) and institutions. Drawing from research in economic sociology and political economy, we offer a novel perspective on MNCs’ influence on transnational institution building. We argue that MNCs seek to influence institutional development by creating or participating in policy networks within transnational social and economic systems. We describe different types of policy networks, the relative position that MNCs occupy within them, and the power MNCs yield by virtue of their position and influence within those networks. We provide examples to illustrate how MNCs exploit these network relationships to influence emergent institutions and to advance convergence in institutional policies. The policy network perspective is an effective and useful mode of analysis to understand the range of interactions among MNCs and the institutional fields in which they operate.
Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A.Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment . Annual Review of Sociology, 2000, 26, 611-639 .
2.
Bennett, C. J.What is policy convergence and what causes it?British Journal of Political Science, 1991, 21, 215-233 .
3.
Benson, J. K.The interorganizational network as a political economy . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 229-249 .
4.
Benson, J. K.A framework for policy analysis. In D. Roger & D. Whitten (Eds), Interrorganizational coordination. Ames: Iowa State University Press , 1982, pp. 137-176.
5.
Birnbaum, P.Political strategies of regulated organizations as functions of context and fear . Strategic Management Journal, 1985, 6, 135-150 .
6.
Boddewyn, J.Political aspects of MNE theory . Journal of International Business Studies, 1988, 19, 341-363 .
7.
Boddewyn, J. & Brewer, T.International business political behavior: New theoretical directions . Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(1), 119-143 .
8.
Bonardi, J.-P. & Keim, G.Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues . Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(3), 555-576 .
9.
Brewer, T.An issue-area approach to the analysis of MNE-government relations . Journal of International Business Studies, 1992, 23, 295-309 .
10.
Bulmer, S.The governance of the European Union: A new institutionalist approach . Journal of Public Policy, 1994, 13(4), 351-380 .
11.
Coen, D.The impact of US lobbying practice on the European business-government relationship . California Management Review, 1999, 41(4), 27-44 .
12.
Coen, D. & Grant, W.Corporate political strategy and global policy: A case study of the Transatlantic Business Dialogue . European Business Journal, 2001, 13(1), 37-44 .
13.
Collier, D. & Messick, R. E.Prerequisites versus diffusion: Testing alternative explanations of social security adoption . American Political Science Review, 1975, 69(4), 1299-1315 .
Dejean, F. , Gond, J.-P. & Leca, B.Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneurship strategy in an emerging industry . Human Relations, 2004, 57, 741-764 .
16.
Diani, M.Network analysis. In B. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds), Methods of social movement research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press , 2002, pp. 173-200.
17.
DiMaggio, P. J.Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger , 1988, pp. 3-21.
18.
DiMaggio, P. J.Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1991, pp. 1-38.
19.
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields . American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2), 147-160 .
20.
Djelic M. L. & Quack, S.Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar , 2003.
21.
Dolowitz, D. & Marsh, D.Who learns from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature . Political Studies, 1996, 44(2), 343-357 .
22.
Dolowitz, D. & Marsh, D.Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making . Governance: An International Journal of Policy Making and Administration, 2000, 13(1), 5-24 .
23.
Dowding, K.Policy networks: Don’t stretch a good idea too far. In P. Dunleavy & J. Stanyer (Eds), Contemporary political studies. Belfast: Political Studies Association , 1994.
24.
Drake, W. & Nikolaidis, K.Ideas, interests, and institutionalization: ‘Trade in services’ and the Uruguay round . International Organization, 1992, 46, 37-100 .
25.
Drezner, D. W.Globalization and policy convergence . International Studies Review, 2001, 3(1), 53-78 .
26.
Dudley, G. & Richardson, R.Arenas without rules and the policy change process: Outsider groups and British road policy . Political Studies, 1998, 44(4), 727-747 .
27.
Eden, L. & Miller, S. R.Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership . Advances in International Management, 2004, 16, 187-221 .
28.
Eden, L. & Molot, M. A.Insiders, outsiders and host country bargains . Journal of International Management, 2002, 8, 359-388 .
29.
Egan, M.Setting standards: Strategic advantages in international trade . Business Strategy Review, 2002, 13(1), 51-64 .
30.
Ernst, D. & Ravenhill, J.Globalization, convergence, and the transformation of international production networks in electronics in East Asia . Business and Politics, 1999, 1(1), 35-62 .
31.
EU Focus. A dynamic transatlantic dialogue fuels growth and jobs . EU Focus, July 2005, pp. 6-7 .
32.
Fagre, N. & Wells, L. T.Bargaining power of multinationals and host governments . Journal of International Business Studies, 1982, 13(2), 9-24 .
33.
Global Corporate Governance Forum. Private sector advisory group. Available at: [www.gcgf.org/ifcext/cgf.nsf/Content/PSAG], accessed 15 October, pp. 2-5.
34.
Gough, C. & Shackley, S.The respectable politics of climate change: The epistemic communities and NGOs . International Affairs, 2001, 77(2), 329-345 .
35.
Green Cowles, M.The European roundtable of industrialists: The strategic player in European affairs. In J. Greenwood (Ed.), European casebook on business alliances. Hemel Hampstead: Prentice-Hall , 1995, pp. 225-236.
36.
Green Cowles, M.Private firms and US-EU policymaking: The Transatlantic Business Dialogue. In E. Philippart & P. Winand (Eds), Policy-making in the US-EU relationship. Manchester: Manchester University Press , 2000.
37.
Green Cowles, M.Large firms and the transformation of EU business associations: A historical perspective. In J. Greenwood (Ed.), The effectiveness of EU business associations. Houndmills: Palgrave , 2002, pp. 64-78.
38.
Greenwood, J.Representing interests in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press , 1997.
39.
Grosse, R. & Behrman, J. N.Theory in international business . Transnational Corporation, 1992, 1, 93-126 .
40.
Haas, P. M.Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination . International Organization, 1992, 46(1), 1-35 .
41.
Haas, P. M.When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process . Journal of European Public Policy, 2004, 11(4), 569-592 .
42.
Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D.Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2001.
43.
Hall, R. B. & Biersteker, T. J.The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2002.
44.
Hillman, A. J. & Wan, W.The determinants of MNE subsidiaries political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality . Journal of International Business Studies, 2005, 36(3), 322-340 .
45.
Hoffman, S.Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation state and the case of Western Europe . Daedelus, 1966, 95, 862-915 .
46.
Howlett, M.Beyond legalism? Policy ideas, implementation styles and emulation based convergence in Canadian and US environmental policy . Journal of Public Policy, 2000, 20(3), 305-329 .
47.
Jenkins-Smith, H. & Sabatier, P. A.The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 1999, pp. 117-166.
48.
Jepperson, R. L.Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1991, pp. 143-163.
49.
Josselin, D. L’économie politique internationale: De l’usage multiforme des réseaux de politique publique. In P. Le Galès & M. Thatcher (Eds), Les réseaux de politique publique: Débats autour des policy networks. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1995, pp. 193-210.
50.
Kellow, A. & Zito, A. R.Steering through complexity: EU environmental regulation in the international context . Political Studies, 2002, 50, 43-60 .
51.
Kenis, P. & Schneider, V.Policy networks and policy analysis: Scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds), Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 1991, pp. 25-59.
52.
Kobrin, S.Political risk: A review and reconsideration . Journal of International Business Studies, 1979, 10(1), 67-80 .
Kostova, T. & Roth, K.Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects . Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45, 215-233 .
55.
Levy, D. L.Business and international environmental treaties: Ozone depletion and climate change . California Management Review, 1997, 39(3), 54-71 .
56.
Levy, D. L. & Egan, D.Capital contests: National and transnational channels of corporate influence on the climate change negotiations . Politics and Society, 1998, 26(3), 337-361 .
57.
Levy, D. L. & Egan, D.A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations . Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(4), 803-829 .
58.
Levy, D. L. & Prakash, A.Bargains old and new: Multinational corporations in global governance . Business and Politics, 2003, 5(2), 131-150 .
59.
Luo, Y. , Shenkar, O. & Nyaw, M.Mitigating liabilities of foreignness: Defensive versus offensive approaches . Journal of International Management, 2002, 8(3), 283-300 .
60.
Mahon, J. F. & McGowan, R. A.Industry as a player in the political and social arena. Westport, CT: Quorum Books , 1996.
61.
Marin, B. & Mayntz, R.Introduction: Studying policy networks. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds), Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 1991, pp. 11-23.
62.
Marsh, D.The development of the policy network approach. In D. Marsh (Ed.), Comparing policy networks. Buckingham: Open University Press , 1998, pp. 3-20.
63.
Marsh, D. & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds). Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press , 1992a.
64.
Marsh, D. & Rhodes, R. A. W.Policy networks in British politics: A critique of existing approaches. In D. Marsh & R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds), Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press , 1992b, pp. 1-26.
65.
McAdam, D. , McCarthy, J. D. & Zald, M. N.Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1996.
66.
McNichol, J. & Bensedrine, J.Multilateral rulemaking: Transatlantic struggles around genetically modified food. In M.-L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds), Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar , 2003, pp. 220-244.
67.
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B.Institutional organizations: Formal structures as myths and ceremony . American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 80, 340-363 .
68.
Moran, T. (Ed.). Multinational corporations: The political economy of foreign direct investment. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books , 1985.
69.
Oliver, C.Strategic responses to institutional processes . Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16, 145-179 .
70.
Peters, G.Policy networks: Myth, metaphor and reality. In D. Marsh (Ed.), Comparing policy networks. Buckingham: Open University Press , 1998, pp. 21-32.
71.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R.The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective. New York: Harper & Row , 1978.
72.
Pollack, M.The new institutionalism and EC governance: The promise and limits of institutional analysis . Governance, 1996, 9(4), 429-458 .
73.
Radaelli, C.Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy . Governance, 2000, 13(1), 25-44 .
74.
Ramamurti, R.The obsolescing ‘bargain model’? MNC-host developing countries relations revisited . Journal of International Business Studies, 2001, 32(1), 23-39 .
75.
Rhodes, R. A. W. & Marsh, D.Policy networks: ‘Defensive’ comments, modest claims and plausible research strategies . Political Studies Association Conference, Belfast, 1994.
76.
Robock, S.Political risk: Identification and assessment . Columbia Journal of World Business, 1971, July/August, pp. 6-20 .
77.
Rosamond, B.Theories of European integration. Houndmills: Palgrave , 2000.
78.
Rowley, T.Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences . Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(4), 887-910 .
79.
Rugman, A. & Verbeke, A.Multinational enterprises and public policy . Journal of International Business Studies, 1998, 29(1), 115-136 .
80.
Sabatier, P. A.Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: Advocacy coalition framework . Knowledge, 1987, 8, 649-692 .
81.
Sabatier, P. A.An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role-oriented learning therein . Policy Sciences, 1988, 21, 128-168 .
82.
Sabatier, P. A. & Zafonte, M.Public knowledge: Advocacy organizations. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds), International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier , 2001, 11563-11568.
83.
Scharpf, F. W.Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 1997.
Sell, S.Multinational corporations as agents of change: The globalization of intellectual property rights. In A. C. Cutler , V. Haufler & T. Porter (Eds), Private authority and international affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press , 1999, pp. 169-197.
86.
Sikkink, K.Human rights, principled issue-networks, and sovereignty in Latin America . International Organization, 1993, 47, 411-441 .
87.
Simon, J. D.A theoretical perspective on political risk . Journal of International Business Studies, 1984, 15(3), 123-143 .
88.
Stone, D.Transfer agents and global networks in the transnationalization of policy . Journal of European Public Policy, 2004, 11(3), 545-566 .
89.
Suchman, M.Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches . Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3), 571-610 .
90.
Teegen, H. , Doh, J. & Vachani, S.The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda . Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, 35(6), 463-483 .
91.
Thatcher, M.The development of policy network analyses: From modest origins to over-arching frameworks . Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1998, 10(4), 389-416 .
92.
Tsebellis, G.Nested games. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1990.
93.
Vernon, R.Sovereignty at bay. New York: Basic Books , 1971.
94.
Westney, E.Institutionalization and the MNE theory. In S. Goshal & E. Westney (Eds), Organization theory and the multinational corporation. New York: St Martin’s Press , 1993, pp. 53-76.
95.
Whitley, R.Dominant forms of economic organization in market economies . Organization Studies, 1994, 15(2), 153-182 .
96.
Whitley, R.Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1999.
97.
Zaheer, S.Overcoming the liability of foreignness . Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38, 341-363 .
98.
Zucker, L. G.Institutional theories of organization . Annual Review of Sociology, 1987, 13, 443-464 .
